{"id":798074,"date":"2026-05-01T06:08:22","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:08:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T06:08:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:08:22","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: FRANCISCO HENRIQUES. SUM?RIO (da responsabilidade do relator): Se a convic??o do julgador puder ser objectiv?vel face aos crit?rios probat?rios e se vers?o apresentada pelo recorrente for meramente alternativa e igualmente poss?vel, dever? manter-se a op??o do julgador, por for?a dos princ?pios da oralidade e da imedia??o da prova. A quest?o da mera opini?o perante as provas produzidas (credibilidade da testemunha ou das declara??es da arguida) n?o faz parte da dupla jurisdi??o em mat?ria de facto, por o tribunal de recurso n?o beneficiar dos princ?pios da imedia??o e oralidade.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/1749dd052dedeb4080258de90039ee99?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: FRANCISCO HENRIQUES. SUM?RIO (da responsabilidade do relator): Se a convic??o do julgador puder ser objectiv?vel face aos crit?rios probat?rios e se vers?o apresentada pelo recorrente for meramente alternativa e igualmente poss?vel, dever? manter-se a op??o do julgador, por for?a dos princ?pios da oralidade e da imedia??o da prova. A quest?o da mera opini?o perante as provas produzidas (credibilidade da testemunha ou das declara??es da arguida) n?o faz parte da dupla jurisdi??o em mat?ria de facto, por o tribunal de recurso n?o beneficiar dos princ?pios da imedia??o e oralidade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-798074","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FRANCISCO HENRIQUES. SUM?RIO (da responsabilidade do relator): Se a convic??o do julgador puder ser objectiv?vel face aos crit?rios probat?rios e se vers?o apresentada pelo recorrente for meramente alternativa e igualmente poss?vel, dever? manter-se a op??o do julgador, por for?a dos princ?pios da oralidade e da imedia??o da prova. A quest?o da mera opini?o perante as provas produzidas (credibilidade da testemunha ou das declara??es da arguida) n?o faz parte da dupla jurisdi??o em mat?ria de facto, por o tribunal de recurso n?o beneficiar dos princ?pios da imedia??o e oralidade.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u062f\u0642\u064a\u0642\u0629\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\\\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T04:08:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\\\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22","og_description":"Relator: FRANCISCO HENRIQUES. SUM?RIO (da responsabilidade do relator): Se a convic??o do julgador puder ser objectiv?vel face aos crit?rios probat?rios e se vers?o apresentada pelo recorrente for meramente alternativa e igualmente poss?vel, dever? manter-se a op??o do julgador, por for?a dos princ?pios da oralidade e da imedia??o da prova. A quest?o da mera opini?o perante as provas produzidas (credibilidade da testemunha ou das declara??es da arguida) n?o faz parte da dupla jurisdi??o em mat?ria de facto, por o tribunal de recurso n?o beneficiar dos princ?pios da imedia??o e oralidade.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"1 \u062f\u0642\u064a\u0642\u0629"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T04:08:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-1030-22-7t9mfr-l1-3-2026-04-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 1030\/22.7T9MFR.L1-3 \u2013 2026-04-22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/798074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=798074"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=798074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}