{"id":1203466,"date":"2026-06-27T08:46:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T06:46:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T10:05:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T08:05:11","slug":"cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-de-lobligation-de-resultat-et-de-la-charge-probatoire\">I. La confirmation de l&#8217;obligation de r\u00e9sultat et de la charge probatoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-portee-de-lobligation-contractuelle-une-obligation-de-resultat\">A. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;obligation contractuelle : une obligation de r\u00e9sultat<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lexigence-probatoire-la-charge-de-la-preuve-du-manquement\">B. L&#8217;exigence probatoire : la charge de la preuve du manquement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-limites-de-la-responsabilite-contractuelle-face-a-labsence-de-desordre-et\">II. Les limites de la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle face \u00e0 l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9sordre \u00e9tabli<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lappreciation-souveraine-des-juges-du-fond-sur-la-materialite-des-desordres\">A. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond sur la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lincidence-de-labsence-de-preuve-de-letat-anterieur-sur-la-demande-indemnitair\">B. L&#8217;incidence de l&#8217;absence de preuve de l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur sur la demande indemnitaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#8217;un litige opposant un syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires \u00e0 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9, au sujet de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une obligation contractuelle de remise en \u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique.<\/p>\n<p>Un protocole d&#8217;accord avait \u00e9t\u00e9 conclu entre les parties, pr\u00e9voyant que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9aliserait des travaux sur des parcelles appartenant \u00e0 la copropri\u00e9t\u00e9, avec l&#8217;obligation de remettre les lieux en l&#8217;\u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique au cours du quatri\u00e8me trimestre 2019. Apr\u00e8s l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution des travaux, le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires a estim\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 n&#8217;avait pas satisfait \u00e0 cette obligation, invoquant une diff\u00e9rence de teinte du b\u00e9ton d\u00e9sactiv\u00e9 et des enrob\u00e9s, ainsi que le caract\u00e8re disgracieux des jonctions entre les parties refaites et anciennes. Le syndicat a donc assign\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 en responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle devant le tribunal judiciaire. Par un jugement, le premier juge a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 le syndicat de sa demande indemnitaire. Le syndicat a interjet\u00e9 appel de cette d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<p>Devant la cour, le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires soutenait que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 avait viol\u00e9 son obligation de r\u00e9sultat, que la diff\u00e9rence de mat\u00e9riaux et de teinte constituait un manquement contractuel, et que le principe de r\u00e9paration int\u00e9grale imposait une reprise compl\u00e8te des diff\u00e9rences de teinte. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9pliquait que les reprises \u00e9taient conformes \u00e0 l&#8217;esprit de l&#8217;engagement, que l&#8217;expert n&#8217;avait constat\u00e9 aucun d\u00e9sordre, que la diff\u00e9rence de teinte s&#8217;estomperait avec le temps, et que la demande \u00e9tait disproportionn\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit qui se posait \u00e0 la cour \u00e9tait de savoir si, dans le cadre d&#8217;une obligation contractuelle de remise en \u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique, le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires rapportait la preuve d&#8217;un manquement de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 cette obligation, justifiant l&#8217;engagement de sa responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle. Par l&#8217;arr\u00eat confirmatif du 21 avril 2026, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon a retenu que la preuve du manquement n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas rapport\u00e9e et a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 le syndicat de ses demandes. Elle a notamment estim\u00e9 que le rapport d&#8217;expertise priv\u00e9e ne mettait pas en \u00e9vidence de d\u00e9sordres et que l&#8217;absence de production d&#8217;un constat ant\u00e9rieur aux travaux emp\u00eachait toute comparaison utile.<\/p>\n<p>Il conviendra d&#8217;analyser d&#8217;abord la confirmation de l&#8217;obligation de r\u00e9sultat pesant sur l&#8217;entrepreneur et la r\u00e9partition de la charge de la preuve (I), puis les limites de cette responsabilit\u00e9 face \u00e0 l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9monstration d&#8217;un d\u00e9sordre certain (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-de-lobligation-de-resultat-et-de-la-charge-probatoire\">I. La confirmation de l&#8217;obligation de r\u00e9sultat et de la charge probatoire<\/h2>\n<p>La cour rappelle implicitement que l&#8217;entrepreneur, tenu par une obligation contractuelle de remise en \u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique, est soumis \u00e0 une obligation de r\u00e9sultat. Cette qualification emporte des cons\u00e9quences probatoires d\u00e9terminantes pour les parties.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-portee-de-lobligation-contractuelle-une-obligation-de-resultat\">A. La port\u00e9e de l&#8217;obligation contractuelle : une obligation de r\u00e9sultat<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article 1231-1 du code civil, vis\u00e9 par le syndicat, pr\u00e9voit que le d\u00e9biteur est condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 des dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats en raison de l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution de son obligation, sauf force majeure. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le protocole d&#8217;accord stipulait que <em>&#8221; la remise en l&#8217;\u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique devra \u00eatre effectu\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em>. La cour retient que cette stipulation cr\u00e9e une obligation de r\u00e9sultat : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 devait parvenir \u00e0 un r\u00e9sultat pr\u00e9cis, \u00e0 savoir la parfaite identit\u00e9 entre l&#8217;\u00e9tat des lieux avant et apr\u00e8s travaux. D\u00e8s lors, tout \u00e9cart par rapport \u00e0 cet \u00e9tat, quelle qu&#8217;en soit la cause, est susceptible d&#8217;engager sa responsabilit\u00e9. La jurisprudence confirme que le professionnel qui s&#8217;engage \u00e0 ex\u00e9cuter une prestation d\u00e9termin\u00e9e est tenu d&#8217;une obligation de r\u00e9sultat, et qu&#8217;il <em>&#8221; ne peut s&#8217;exon\u00e9rer qu&#8217;en d\u00e9montrant l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca8ef8b05f898609a8c0e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, 6 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/03663)<\/a><\/strong>. Cette pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 p\u00e8se donc sur l&#8217;entrepreneur. Toutefois, encore faut-il que le cr\u00e9ancier de l&#8217;obligation d\u00e9montre que le r\u00e9sultat promis n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 atteint.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lexigence-probatoire-la-charge-de-la-preuve-du-manquement\">B. L&#8217;exigence probatoire : la charge de la preuve du manquement<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article 9 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile impose \u00e0 chaque partie de prouver les faits n\u00e9cessaires au succ\u00e8s de sa pr\u00e9tention. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires avait la charge d&#8217;\u00e9tablir que la remise en \u00e9tat n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas \u00e0 l&#8217;identique. La cour examine les pi\u00e8ces produites : un rapport d&#8217;expertise priv\u00e9e, deux proc\u00e8s-verbaux de constat. Elle rel\u00e8ve que le rapport d&#8217;expertise priv\u00e9e conclut \u00e0 l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9sordres, expliquant la diff\u00e9rence de teinte par l&#8217;exposition aux intemp\u00e9ries et pr\u00e9voyant son estompage. Les photographies de 2024 confirment cette att\u00e9nuation. Quant aux jonctions, l&#8217;expert indique qu&#8217;elles sont de niveau et sans d\u00e9sordre. La cour en d\u00e9duit que le syndicat n&#8217;apporte pas la preuve d&#8217;un manquement \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de remise en \u00e9tat \u00e0 l&#8217;identique. Elle souligne \u00e9galement que le syndicat s&#8217;abstient de produire le constat d&#8217;huissier de 2017, r\u00e9alis\u00e9 avant les travaux, ce qui emp\u00eache toute comparaison. Ainsi, la charge de la preuve incombant au demandeur n&#8217;est pas satisfaite, ce qui conduit au rejet de la demande.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-limites-de-la-responsabilite-contractuelle-face-a-labsence-de-desordre-et\">II. Les limites de la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle face \u00e0 l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9sordre \u00e9tabli<\/h2>\n<p>La cour pr\u00e9cise les conditions dans lesquelles un manquement \u00e0 une obligation de r\u00e9sultat peut \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9, en insistant sur l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond et sur l&#8217;importance de l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur des lieux.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lappreciation-souveraine-des-juges-du-fond-sur-la-materialite-des-desordres\">A. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond sur la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres<\/h3>\n<p>La cour dispose d&#8217;un pouvoir souverain pour \u00e9valuer les preuves et constater l&#8217;existence ou non d&#8217;un d\u00e9sordre. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, elle s&#8217;appuie sur le rapport d&#8217;expertise priv\u00e9e qui, bien que non judiciaire, constitue un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de preuve concordant. L&#8217;expert note que <em>&#8221; la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence du b\u00e9ton mis en \u0153uvre est la m\u00eame que celle d&#8217;origine &#8220;<\/em> et que la diff\u00e9rence de teinte, purement esth\u00e9tique, <em>&#8221; va s&#8217;estomper dans le temps &#8220;<\/em>. La cour confirme que ce constat est corrobor\u00e9 par les photographies de 2024. S&#8217;agissant des jonctions, le rapport d&#8217;expertise mentionne qu&#8217;elles sont <em>&#8221; de niveau &#8220;<\/em> et <em>&#8221; ne pr\u00e9sentent pas de d\u00e9sordre &#8220;<\/em>. La cour en d\u00e9duit qu&#8217;aucun manquement objectif \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de r\u00e9sultat n&#8217;est \u00e9tabli. Elle \u00e9carte ainsi la demande du syndicat, jugeant que les simples all\u00e9gations d&#8217;une diff\u00e9rence de teinte et de jonctions disgracieuses ne suffisent pas \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer une inex\u00e9cution. Cette appr\u00e9ciation est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence qui exige du cr\u00e9ancier qu&#8217;il rapporte la preuve d&#8217;un dysfonctionnement concret, et non d&#8217;une simple g\u00eane esth\u00e9tique temporaire <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b81d7fab36edb5c456516d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(cf. Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b020\/12794, qui distingue l&#8217;obligation de r\u00e9sultat en mati\u00e8re de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d&#8217;autres obligations contractuelles)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lincidence-de-labsence-de-preuve-de-letat-anterieur-sur-la-demande-indemnitair\">B. L&#8217;incidence de l&#8217;absence de preuve de l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur sur la demande indemnitaire<\/h3>\n<p>La cour rel\u00e8ve que le syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires n&#8217;a pas produit le proc\u00e8s-verbal de constat des lieux \u00e9tabli avant le d\u00e9but des travaux (29 mars 2017), pourtant cit\u00e9 dans un courrier annex\u00e9 au protocole d&#8217;accord. Cette absence est d\u00e9terminante : la cour ne peut comparer l&#8217;\u00e9tat des enrob\u00e9s et du b\u00e9ton avant et apr\u00e8s les travaux. Le protocole imposait une remise en \u00e9tat <em>&#8221; \u00e0 l&#8217;identique &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui suppose de conna\u00eetre l&#8217;\u00e9tat initial. Faute de cette preuve, le syndicat ne peut d\u00e9montrer que la diff\u00e9rence de teinte ou les jonctions constituent un \u00e9cart par rapport \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur. La cour en tire une cons\u00e9quence logique : elle <em>&#8221; n&#8217;est pas en mesure de comparer l&#8217;\u00e9tat du b\u00e9ton et des enrob\u00e9s avant et apr\u00e8s la r\u00e9alisation des travaux &#8220;<\/em>. D\u00e8s lors, la demande indemnitaire ne peut prosp\u00e9rer. Cette solution illustre la rigueur probatoire impos\u00e9e au cr\u00e9ancier d&#8217;une obligation de r\u00e9sultat : celui-ci doit \u00e9tablir non seulement l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un \u00e9cart, mais aussi que cet \u00e9cart ne correspond pas \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tat ant\u00e9rieur convenu. La confirmation du jugement d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 s&#8217;impose donc.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca8ef8b05f898609a8c0e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/03663<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b81d7fab36edb5c456516d\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b020\/12794<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000046194029\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3345-2 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les organismes mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 213-1 ou L. 752-4 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ou \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 723-3 du code rural et de la p\u00eache maritime disposent d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai, fix\u00e9 par d\u00e9cret, \u00e0 compter du d\u00e9p\u00f4t aupr\u00e8s de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative des accords mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 3313-3 et L. 3323-4 du pr\u00e9sent code et des r\u00e8glements des plans d&#8217;\u00e9pargne mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 3332-9, L. 3333-2, L. 3334-2 et L. 3334-4 du pr\u00e9sent code et aux articles L. 224-14 et L. 224-16 du code mon\u00e9taire et financier, pour demander le retrait ou la modification des clauses contraires aux dispositions l\u00e9gales, \u00e0 l&#8217;exception des r\u00e8gles relatives aux modalit\u00e9s de d\u00e9nonciation et de r\u00e9vision des accords. <\/p>\n<p>Le d\u00e9lai mentionn\u00e9 au premier alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article ne peut exc\u00e9der trois mois.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000046194022\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3345-3 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>En l&#8217;absence de demande d&#8217;un organisme mentionn\u00e9 aux articles L. 213-1 ou L. 752-4 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ou \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 723-3 du code rural et de la p\u00eache maritime dans le d\u00e9lai fix\u00e9 au premier alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L. 3345-2 du pr\u00e9sent code, aucune contestation ult\u00e9rieure de la conformit\u00e9 des termes de l&#8217;accord ou du r\u00e8glement aux dispositions l\u00e9gales en vigueur au moment de sa conclusion ne peut avoir pour effet de remettre en cause les exon\u00e9rations fiscales et sociales attach\u00e9es aux avantages accord\u00e9s aux salari\u00e9s au titre des exercices en cours ou ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 la contestation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032010123\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1231-1 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le d\u00e9biteur est condamn\u00e9, s&#8217;il y a lieu, au paiement de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats soit \u00e0 raison de l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;obligation, soit \u00e0 raison du retard dans l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution, s&#8217;il ne justifie pas que l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution a \u00e9t\u00e9 emp\u00each\u00e9e par la force majeure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410102\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 9 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Il incombe \u00e0 chaque partie de prouver conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi les faits n\u00e9cessaires au succ\u00e8s de sa pr\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#8217;un litige opposant un syndicat des&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9482,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69e9acf0cdc6046d4737e45b","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69e9acf0cdc6046d4737e45b","_kj_judilibre_id":"69e9acf0cdc6046d4737e45b","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Lyon","_kj_chambre":"1\u00e8re chambre civile B","_kj_rg":"24\/05863","_kj_date":"2026-04-21","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454,6581,7123,6580,6719,35583,6718,6992],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1203466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques","category-droit-de-la-famille","category-droit-du-travail","category-droit-social","category-famille","category-immobilier","category-social","category-travail"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d&#039;appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#039;un litige opposant un syndicat des...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d&#039;appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d&#039;un litige opposant un syndicat des...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6528\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"5499\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\\\/05863\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1997,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Droit de la Famille\",\"Droit du travail\",\"Droit Social\",\"Famille\",\"Immobilier\",\"Social\",\"Travail\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\\\/05863\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit de la Famille\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit du travail\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit Social\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Famille\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Immobilier\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Social\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Travail\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\\\/05863 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d'appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'un litige opposant un syndicat des...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6528,\"height\":5499},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\\\/05863\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d'appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'un litige opposant un syndicat des...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863","og_description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d'appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'un litige opposant un syndicat des...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6528,"height":5499,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629":"Kohen","\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"9 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863","datePublished":"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/"},"wordCount":1997,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Droit de la Famille","Droit du travail","Droit Social","Famille","Immobilier","Social","Travail"],"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit de la Famille"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit du travail"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit Social"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Famille"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Immobilier"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Social"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Travail"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/","name":"Cour d'appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-27T06:46:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-27T08:05:11+00:00","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 21 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile B de la Cour d'appel de Lyon a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d'un litige opposant un syndicat des...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","width":6528,"height":5499},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-lyon-le-21-avril-2026-n24-05863\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Lyon, le 21 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/05863"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-kZiOPpjVuEg-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-534K","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":801776,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-1-avril-2011-n2011-119\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":0},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 1 avril 2011, n\u00b02011-119","author":"Kohen","date":"1 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision le 1er avril 2011 sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9. La requ\u00e9rante contestait l'article...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-0ITfUIWxi9k-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1205304,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-23-avril-2026-n24-01196\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":1},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 23 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/01196","author":"Kohen","date":"27 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d'appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union, dans un arr\u00eat du 23 avril 2026 (n\u00b024\/01196), \u00e9tait saisie d'un litige opposant une salari\u00e9e \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457061,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/ce-conseil-detat-22-01-2026-n-511666\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":2},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 22\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 511666","author":"Kohen","date":"7 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a rendu, le 22 janvier 2026, une ordonnance relative au droit fondamental \u00e0 l\u2019h\u00e9bergement d\u2019urgence. Les requ\u00e9rants,...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495137,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-3-decembre-2025-n19-02852\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b019\/02852","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, a rendu un jugement le 22 avril 2025. Une salari\u00e9e avait sollicit\u00e9 la reconnaissance du...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-KP0uq0vIgI4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493130,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-7-novembre-2025-n23-01634\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b023\/01634","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant \u00e0 juge unique le 7 novembre 2025, se prononce sur un recours en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accident du travail. L\u2019employeur...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495176,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nimes-le-3-decembre-2025-n24-05777\/","url_meta":{"origin":1203466,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de N\u00eemes, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b024\/05777","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de N\u00eemes, statuant en chambre de la famille, a rendu un jugement le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025. Une personne a engag\u00e9 une action en recherche...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kamran-abdullayev-KGkwMo7r-kA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1203466"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1203688,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203466\/revisions\/1203688"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9482"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1203466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1203466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1203466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}