{"id":1230759,"date":"2026-07-02T07:43:23","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T05:43:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T07:43:23","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T05:43:23","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-strictes-de-la-communication-forcee-de-pieces\">I. La confirmation des conditions strictes de la communication forc\u00e9e de pi\u00e8ces<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-laffirmation-dune-recevabilite-subordonnee-au-respect-des-formes-et-du-contrad\">A. L&#8217;affirmation d&#8217;une recevabilit\u00e9 subordonn\u00e9e au respect des formes et du contradictoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-au-fond-pour-defaut-dutilite-probatoire\">B. Le rejet au fond pour d\u00e9faut d&#8217;utilit\u00e9 probatoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-dun-controle-rigoureux-de-la-necessite-de-la-mesure-probatoire\">II. La port\u00e9e d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le rigoureux de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la mesure probatoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexigence-dun-lien-etroit-entre-la-piece-sollicitee-et-lobjet-du-litige\">A. L&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un lien \u00e9troit entre la pi\u00e8ce sollicit\u00e9e et l&#8217;objet du litige<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-sanction-dune-demande-dilatoire-et-la-poursuite-de-linstance\">B. La sanction d&#8217;une demande dilatoire et la poursuite de l&#8217;instance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d&#8217;une demande de communication forc\u00e9e de pi\u00e8ces dirig\u00e9e contre une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 (la SARLU MAXEL.IMMOBILIER). La demanderesse souhaitait obtenir la justification du versement d&#8217;une somme de 122 500 euros, pr\u00e9tendument pr\u00eat\u00e9e, ainsi que l&#8217;extrait du grand livre du compte courant que la d\u00e9fenderesse d\u00e9tenait dans une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 tierce. La demanderesse contestait la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du versement et soutenait que ces documents \u00e9taient n\u00e9cessaires pour \u00e9tablir l&#8217;existence de la cr\u00e9ance invoqu\u00e9e \u00e0 son encontre.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure s&#8217;est d\u00e9roul\u00e9e sur le fondement des articles 138 et 139 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, la demanderesse ayant adress\u00e9 ses demandes par lettres des 4 et 11 f\u00e9vrier 2026. La d\u00e9fenderesse a fait valoir ses observations par la m\u00eame voie. Le tribunal a d&#8217;abord d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la demande recevable, les conditions de l&#8217;article 139 \u00e9tant remplies et le contradictoire ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9. Au fond, il a rejet\u00e9 les deux demandes de production.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit soumise au tribunal \u00e9tait de savoir si une partie peut obtenir la communication forc\u00e9e d&#8217;une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9tenue par son adversaire lorsque cette pi\u00e8ce n&#8217;appara\u00eet pas utile \u00e0 l&#8217;instruction du proc\u00e8s, eu \u00e9gard aux \u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u00e9j\u00e0 produits. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par la n\u00e9gative, estimant que la production d&#8217;une pi\u00e8ce compl\u00e9mentaire ne s&#8217;impose que si elle est <em>&#8220;\u00e9minemment n\u00e9cessaire&#8221;<\/em> \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;un droit, et qu&#8217;en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce les pi\u00e8ces d\u00e9j\u00e0 vers\u00e9es suffisaient \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du pr\u00eat. Il a en outre relev\u00e9 que la seconde demande \u00e9tait d\u00e9pourvue de toute justification quant \u00e0 son utilit\u00e9 dans l&#8217;instance.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision pr\u00e9sente un double int\u00e9r\u00eat. Elle rappelle d&#8217;une part les strictes conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 et de bien-fond\u00e9 des demandes de communication forc\u00e9e, et d&#8217;autre part elle illustre les limites du pouvoir du juge dans l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation de l&#8217;utilit\u00e9 d&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;instruction.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-strictes-de-la-communication-forcee-de-pieces\">I. La confirmation des conditions strictes de la communication forc\u00e9e de pi\u00e8ces<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-laffirmation-dune-recevabilite-subordonnee-au-respect-des-formes-et-du-contrad\">A. L&#8217;affirmation d&#8217;une recevabilit\u00e9 subordonn\u00e9e au respect des formes et du contradictoire<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal de commerce de Cannes a pr\u00e9alablement v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 que les conditions de l&#8217;article 139 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e9taient remplies, sans se livrer \u00e0 un examen approfondi du fond de la demande \u00e0 ce stade. Il a relev\u00e9 que les demandes avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 formul\u00e9es par lettres adress\u00e9es au tribunal, que la d\u00e9fenderesse avait pu pr\u00e9senter ses observations, et que le principe du contradictoire avait \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Cette position est conforme \u00e0 la lettre de l&#8217;article 139 qui exige que la demande soit form\u00e9e par simple requ\u00eate, sans formalisme excessif, mais dans le respect du d\u00e9bat contradictoire. En d\u00e9clarant la demande recevable, le tribunal s&#8217;est assur\u00e9 que la proc\u00e9dure avait \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement engag\u00e9e. Cette approche pragmatique \u00e9vite de fermer pr\u00e9matur\u00e9ment l&#8217;acc\u00e8s \u00e0 une mesure probatoire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-au-fond-pour-defaut-dutilite-probatoire\">B. Le rejet au fond pour d\u00e9faut d&#8217;utilit\u00e9 probatoire<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a ensuite examin\u00e9 le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande au regard de l&#8217;article 138 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui pr\u00e9voit que le juge peut ordonner la production d&#8217;une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9tenue par une partie si la demande est <em>&#8220;fond\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em>. Il a \u00e9nonc\u00e9 un crit\u00e8re particuli\u00e8rement exigeant : la production ordonn\u00e9e doit \u00eatre <em>&#8220;\u00e9minemment n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d&#8217;un droit ou d&#8217;un acte&#8221;<\/em>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, il a constat\u00e9 que le contrat de pr\u00eat \u00e9tait vers\u00e9 aux d\u00e9bats et non contest\u00e9, et qu&#8217;un protocole d&#8217;accord post\u00e9rieur contenait une <em>&#8220;reconnaissance explicite de dette&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments \u00e9taient selon lui suffisants pour \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du pr\u00eat. Le tribunal a donc estim\u00e9 que la pi\u00e8ce suppl\u00e9mentaire sollicit\u00e9e n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas utile \u00e0 l&#8217;instruction du proc\u00e8s. La m\u00eame analyse a \u00e9t\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 la seconde demande, jug\u00e9e sans lien avec l&#8217;objet du litige. Ce faisant, le tribunal a refus\u00e9 de faire droit \u00e0 une demande qui visait en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 \u00e0 prolonger inutilement le d\u00e9bat.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-dun-controle-rigoureux-de-la-necessite-de-la-mesure-probatoire\">II. La port\u00e9e d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le rigoureux de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la mesure probatoire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexigence-dun-lien-etroit-entre-la-piece-sollicitee-et-lobjet-du-litige\">A. L&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un lien \u00e9troit entre la pi\u00e8ce sollicit\u00e9e et l&#8217;objet du litige<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal de commerce de Cannes s&#8217;inscrit dans une lecture restrictive des textes relatifs \u00e0 la communication forc\u00e9e. Le juge a op\u00e9r\u00e9 un contr\u00f4le concret de l&#8217;utilit\u00e9 de la mesure en la mettant en balance avec les pi\u00e8ces d\u00e9j\u00e0 produites. Il a soulign\u00e9 que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments apport\u00e9s par la d\u00e9fenderesse \u2013 contrat de pr\u00eat et protocole d&#8217;accord \u2013 rendaient inutile une v\u00e9rification suppl\u00e9mentaire.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche est coh\u00e9rente avec la jurisprudence de la Cour de cassation qui rappelle que la communication forc\u00e9e n&#8217;est pas un moyen de contourner les r\u00e8gles de la preuve. La Chambre commerciale a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;l&#8217;illic\u00e9it\u00e9 ou la d\u00e9loyaut\u00e9 dans l&#8217;obtention ou la production d&#8217;un moyen de preuve ne conduit pas n\u00e9cessairement \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9carter des d\u00e9bats&#8221;<\/em>, mais que le juge doit appr\u00e9cier si la preuve porte atteinte au caract\u00e8re \u00e9quitable de la proc\u00e9dure <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68ca5ac4892376614a8345cd\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. com., 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b024-14.689)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal de Cannes a ici fait application d&#8217;un principe similaire en limitant la mesure \u00e0 ce qui est strictement n\u00e9cessaire.<\/p>\n<p>En outre, le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 la seconde demande en relevant que la demanderesse n&#8217;expliquait pas en quoi le compte courant de la d\u00e9fenderesse dans une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 tierce serait utile \u00e0 l&#8217;instance. Cette d\u00e9cision rappelle que la demande de communication doit \u00eatre en lien direct avec l&#8217;objet du litige, une condition que la demanderesse n&#8217;avait pas remplie.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-sanction-dune-demande-dilatoire-et-la-poursuite-de-linstance\">B. La sanction d&#8217;une demande dilatoire et la poursuite de l&#8217;instance<\/h3>\n<p>En rejetant la demande de communication, le tribunal a \u00e9galement sanctionn\u00e9 ce qui apparaissait comme une tentative de ralentir la proc\u00e9dure. Il a relev\u00e9 que les explications suppl\u00e9mentaires fournies par la demanderesse dans son courrier du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2026 \u00e9taient <em>&#8220;sans int\u00e9r\u00eat&#8221;<\/em> car elles concernaient les relations entre la demanderesse et une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 non partie \u00e0 l&#8217;instance.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a ainsi fait usage de son pouvoir d&#8217;injonction en fixant un calendrier de proc\u00e9dure pour que l&#8217;affaire soit jug\u00e9e au fond. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la volont\u00e9 des juridictions de lutter contre les man\u0153uvres dilatoires et de garantir un d\u00e9roulement efficace du proc\u00e8s. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon a pu relever dans une affaire similaire que la communication forc\u00e9e ne saurait \u00eatre utilis\u00e9e pour <em>&#8220;permettre dans un d\u00e9bat de fond r\u00e9serv\u00e9 de conna\u00eetre les \u00e9l\u00e9ments comptables adverses&#8221;<\/em> (CA Lyon, 20 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00230).<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du Tribunal de commerce de Cannes du 9 avril 2026 appara\u00eet ainsi comme un rappel salutaire des limites de la communication forc\u00e9e. Elle r\u00e9affirme que le juge doit contr\u00f4ler strictement l&#8217;utilit\u00e9 de la mesure et qu&#8217;il peut la refuser lorsque les \u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u00e9j\u00e0 produits suffisent \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d&#8217;un droit. Cette solution participe d&#8217;une bonne administration de la justice en \u00e9vitant que la proc\u00e9dure ne soit d\u00e9tourn\u00e9e de son objet.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/678f383506f4e91c5f36c4ca\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Lyon, le 20 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00230<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68ca5ac4892376614a8345cd\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Chambre commerciale financi\u00e8re et \u00e9conomique, le 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b024-14.689<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410261\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 138 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Si, dans le cours d&#8217;une instance, une partie entend faire \u00e9tat d&#8217;un acte authentique ou sous seing priv\u00e9 auquel elle n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 partie ou d&#8217;une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9tenue par un tiers, elle peut demander au juge saisi de l&#8217;affaire d&#8217;ordonner la d\u00e9livrance d&#8217;une exp\u00e9dition ou la production de l&#8217;acte ou de la pi\u00e8ce.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410262\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 139 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   La demande est faite sans forme.<\/p>\n<p>    Le juge, s&#8217;il estime cette demande fond\u00e9e, ordonne la d\u00e9livrance ou la production de l&#8217;acte ou de la pi\u00e8ce, en original, en copie ou en extrait selon le cas, dans les conditions et sous les garanties qu&#8217;il fixe, au besoin \u00e0 peine d&#8217;astreinte.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d&#8217;une demande de communication forc\u00e9e&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9488,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a2cbcf4cdc6046d471fcefb","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a2cbcf4cdc6046d471fcefb","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a2cbcf4cdc6046d471fcefb","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Cannes","_kj_chambre":"contentieux - premi\u00e8re chambre","_kj_rg":"2026F00003","_kj_date":"2026-04-09","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1230759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d&#039;une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d&#039;une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5472\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3648\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1556,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d'une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5472,\"height\":3648},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d'une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003","og_description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d'une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5472,"height":3648,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629":"Kohen","\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"7 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003","datePublished":"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/"},"wordCount":1556,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T05:43:23+00:00","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 commerciale (la SARLU CRC 26 INVEST) d'une demande de communication forc\u00e9e...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","width":5472,"height":3648},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00003\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00003"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-F5R9DuVUaPU-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aaX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1230769,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2025f00174\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00174","author":"Kohen","date":"2 \u064a\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, par un jugement du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00174), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande tendant \u00e0 voir constater un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-v_YYHSi9aoU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1230707,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2025f00259\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00259","author":"Kohen","date":"2 \u064a\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, dans un jugement du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00259), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019homologation d\u2019un protocole transactionnel...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1230711,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00256\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00256","author":"Kohen","date":"2 \u064a\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, par un jugement du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L00256), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande d'offre de cession dans le cadre d'une...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-3UfkjHxVch0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":488775,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-25-novembre-2025-n2025l00567\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 25 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025L00567","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Grasse, statuant le 9 juillet 2024, examine une demande de modification de plan de sauvegarde. La proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9v\u00e8le un versement...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kylie-paz-cbl1K6yJlDI-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1230762,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-9-avril-2026-n2025f00146\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00146","author":"Kohen","date":"2 \u064a\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes (contentieux - premi\u00e8re chambre) a rendu un jugement sous le num\u00e9ro 2025F00146. Cette d\u00e9cision porte...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luke-michael-DUV8TJtD2QY-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211427,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cannes-le-7-avril-2026-n2026l00253\/","url_meta":{"origin":1230759,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00253","author":"Kohen","date":"28 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cannes, par un jugement du 7 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L00253), a ordonn\u00e9 la poursuite de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation d\u2019un d\u00e9biteur,...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1230759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1230759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1230759\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1230759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1230759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1230759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}