{"id":1235336,"date":"2026-07-03T06:06:57","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T04:06:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/"},"modified":"2026-07-03T06:23:16","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T04:23:16","slug":"cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-reconnaissance-dune-obligation-de-moyens-de-ladministration-dans-la-composi\">I. La reconnaissance d\u2019une obligation de moyens de l\u2019administration dans la composition de la commission de discipline<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexigence-dun-assesseur-exterieur-une-garantie-de-procedure-temperee-par-la-re\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur : une garantie de proc\u00e9dure temp\u00e9r\u00e9e par la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du fonctionnement p\u00e9nitentiaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-conciliation-entre-le-bon-exercice-du-pouvoir-disciplinaire-et-les-garantie\">B. La conciliation entre le bon exercice du pouvoir disciplinaire et les garanties proc\u00e9durales<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-lappreciation-in-concreto-des-autres-moyens-de-legalite-et-le-controle-de-pro\">II. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation in concreto des autres moyens de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 et le contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9 des sanctions<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexamen-rigoureux-de-la-regularite-externe-des-sanctions-une-application-stric\">A. L\u2019examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 externe des sanctions : une application stricte des textes<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-controle-de-proportionnalite-des-sanctions-une-appreciation-souveraine-des-\">B. Le contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9 des sanctions : une appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des faits<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre un jugement du tribunal administratif de Marseille du 8 avril 2025. Ce jugement avait annul\u00e9, pour vice de proc\u00e9dure, les d\u00e9cisions implicites de rejet du recours pr\u00e9alable form\u00e9 par un d\u00e9tenu contre trois sanctions disciplinaires prononc\u00e9es \u00e0 son encontre le 5 mai 2022. Les faits sont les suivants : le d\u00e9tenu a \u00e9t\u00e9 sanctionn\u00e9 pour insultes et menaces envers un surveillant (proc\u00e9dure n\u00b02022000122), pour insalubrit\u00e9 de sa cellule (n\u00b02022000124) et pour refus d\u2019obtemp\u00e9rer \u00e0 une injonction de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 (n\u00b02022000123). Devant le tribunal administratif, le requ\u00e9rant avait soutenu que la commission de discipline \u00e9tait irr\u00e9guli\u00e8rement compos\u00e9e faute d\u2019un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur, ce qui avait conduit \u00e0 l\u2019annulation. En appel, le ministre soutenait que l\u2019administration avait accompli toutes les diligences possibles pour obtenir un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur et que le vice n\u2019\u00e9tait donc pas constitu\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le probl\u00e8me de droit soulev\u00e9 \u00e9tait de savoir si l\u2019absence d\u2019un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur en commission de discipline constitue une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 substantielle justifiant l\u2019annulation des sanctions disciplinaires, lorsque l\u2019administration justifie avoir mis en \u0153uvre tous les moyens \u00e0 sa disposition pour assurer la pr\u00e9sence de cet assesseur. La cour a r\u00e9pondu par la n\u00e9gative : elle a jug\u00e9 que, dans les circonstances de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019administration devait \u00eatre regard\u00e9e comme ayant satisfait \u00e0 son obligation, en produisant un courriel d\u00e9montrant ses diligences. Elle en a d\u00e9duit que le jugement attaqu\u00e9 avait annul\u00e9 \u00e0 tort les sanctions pour ce motif. Apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9cart\u00e9 les autres moyens de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 externe et interne, elle a annul\u00e9 le jugement et rejet\u00e9 la demande du d\u00e9tenu.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-reconnaissance-dune-obligation-de-moyens-de-ladministration-dans-la-composi\">I. La reconnaissance d\u2019une obligation de moyens de l\u2019administration dans la composition de la commission de discipline<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexigence-dun-assesseur-exterieur-une-garantie-de-procedure-temperee-par-la-re\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur : une garantie de proc\u00e9dure temp\u00e9r\u00e9e par la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du fonctionnement p\u00e9nitentiaire<\/h3>\n<p>La commission de discipline pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l\u2019article R. 234-1 du code p\u00e9nitentiaire doit, en principe, comprendre un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur. Cette r\u00e8gle vise \u00e0 garantir l\u2019impartialit\u00e9 de l\u2019instance disciplinaire. Cependant, la cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille op\u00e8re une distinction entre l\u2019existence d\u2019une garantie et la sanction de sa m\u00e9connaissance. Elle rel\u00e8ve que l\u2019administration a, par un courriel du 10 juillet 2020, d\u00e9montr\u00e9 <em>&#8221; des diligences accomplies en vain par la maison centrale d\u2019Arles pour faire nommer un second assesseur &#8220;<\/em>. Elle constate qu\u2019<em>&#8221; aucun assesseur ext\u00e9rieur ne figurait sur le tableau de roulement &#8220;<\/em> et que l\u2019administration <em>&#8221; justif[iait] avoir mis en \u0153uvre tous les moyens \u00e0 sa disposition &#8220;<\/em>. La cour \u00e9carte ainsi le vice de proc\u00e9dure retenu en premi\u00e8re instance, au motif que l\u2019administration a satisfait \u00e0 une obligation de moyens et non de r\u00e9sultat. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans une logique pragmatique : l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 mat\u00e9rielle de trouver un assesseur, attest\u00e9e par des d\u00e9marches concr\u00e8tes, ne saurait entra\u00eener syst\u00e9matiquement l\u2019annulation des sanctions. La Haute juridiction sociale a d\u2019ailleurs r\u00e9cemment rappel\u00e9, dans le domaine de la proc\u00e9dure disciplinaire, que <em>&#8221; l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 commise dans le d\u00e9roulement de la proc\u00e9dure disciplinaire, pr\u00e9vue par une disposition conventionnelle, est assimil\u00e9e \u00e0 la violation d\u2019une garantie de fond lorsqu\u2019elle a priv\u00e9 le salari\u00e9 des droits de sa d\u00e9fense ou lorsqu\u2019elle est susceptible d\u2019avoir exerc\u00e9 en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce une influence sur la d\u00e9cision finale de l\u2019employeur &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68ca5a21892376614a83452f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. soc., 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b023-23.830)<\/a><\/strong>. Transpos\u00e9e au contentieux p\u00e9nitentiaire, cette approche conduit \u00e0 ne sanctionner l\u2019absence d\u2019assesseur ext\u00e9rieur que si elle a concr\u00e8tement nui aux droits de la d\u00e9fense. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le d\u00e9tenu n\u2019all\u00e9guait aucun pr\u00e9judice sp\u00e9cifique.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-conciliation-entre-le-bon-exercice-du-pouvoir-disciplinaire-et-les-garantie\">B. La conciliation entre le bon exercice du pouvoir disciplinaire et les garanties proc\u00e9durales<\/h3>\n<p>La cour justifie sa position par la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de ne pas compromettre <em>&#8221; le bon exercice du pouvoir disciplinaire &#8220;<\/em>. Elle observe que <em>&#8221; le report sine die de cette commission compromettait manifestement le bon exercice du pouvoir disciplinaire &#8220;<\/em>. En d\u2019autres termes, l\u2019administration ne peut rester paralys\u00e9e par l\u2019absence de nomination d\u2019un assesseur ext\u00e9rieur. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9conomie du code p\u00e9nitentiaire, qui confie au chef d\u2019\u00e9tablissement un large pouvoir d\u2019organisation de la discipline. Elle se distingue cependant de certaines exigences plus strictes relev\u00e9es par d\u2019autres juridictions. Par exemple, la cour d\u2019appel de Riom a jug\u00e9 qu\u2019<em>&#8221; un conseil de discipline ne peut comprendre que des personnes \u00e9trang\u00e8res \u00e0 l\u2019organisme auquel appartient l\u2019agent en cause &#8220;<\/em> (CA Riom, 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/00942), mais cette d\u00e9cision concernait la fonction publique, non le milieu p\u00e9nitentiaire. La cour de Marseille adapte la r\u00e8gle aux contraintes sp\u00e9cifiques de la d\u00e9tention, o\u00f9 les difficult\u00e9s pratiques de recrutement d\u2019assesseurs ext\u00e9rieurs sont r\u00e9elles. La solution consacre une souplesse appr\u00e9ciable pour l\u2019administration, mais elle risque de fragiliser la protection des droits des d\u00e9tenus si elle n\u2019est pas encadr\u00e9e par des preuves tangibles de diligences.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-lappreciation-in-concreto-des-autres-moyens-de-legalite-et-le-controle-de-pro\">II. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation in concreto des autres moyens de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 et le contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9 des sanctions<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexamen-rigoureux-de-la-regularite-externe-des-sanctions-une-application-stric\">A. L\u2019examen rigoureux de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 externe des sanctions : une application stricte des textes<\/h3>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9cart\u00e9 le moyen tir\u00e9 de l\u2019absence d\u2019assesseur, la cour examine les autres griefs de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 externe. Elle v\u00e9rifie successivement la comp\u00e9tence du pr\u00e9sident de la commission de discipline (M. A&#8230; D&#8230; en qualit\u00e9 de directeur), la d\u00e9l\u00e9gation de signature pour engager les poursuites (M. B&#8230; E&#8230;, chef de service p\u00e9nitentiaire, r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement habilit\u00e9 par une d\u00e9cision du 1er mars 2022 publi\u00e9e au recueil des actes administratifs), la qualit\u00e9 du r\u00e9dacteur des rapports d\u2019enqu\u00eate (premier surveillant, comp\u00e9tent), le respect du d\u00e9lai de pr\u00e9paration de la d\u00e9fense (consultation du dossier le 3 mai 2022 \u00e0 14h47 pour une s\u00e9ance le 5 mai 2022 \u00e0 9h, soit plus de 24 heures). La cour rejette \u00e9galement l\u2019argument tir\u00e9 du refus de remettre une copie du dossier, relevant qu\u2019<em>&#8221; il ne r\u00e9sulte ni des dispositions de l\u2019article R. 234-15 du code p\u00e9nitentiaire ni d\u2019aucune disposition du code p\u00e9nitentiaire qu\u2019une copie de son dossier devrait \u00eatre remise au d\u00e9tenu poursuivi &#8220;<\/em>. Ce faisant, elle applique strictement les textes sans \u00e9largir les garanties au-del\u00e0 de ce qu\u2019ils pr\u00e9voient. Cette approche est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante du juge administratif, qui refuse d\u2019ajouter aux prescriptions r\u00e9glementaires.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-controle-de-proportionnalite-des-sanctions-une-appreciation-souveraine-des-\">B. Le contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9 des sanctions : une appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des faits<\/h3>\n<p>La cour examine ensuite la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 interne de chaque sanction. Pour la proc\u00e9dure n\u00b02022000122 (insultes et menaces), elle retient une faute du premier degr\u00e9 et juge la sanction de sept jours de cellule disciplinaire proportionn\u00e9e <em>&#8221; compte tenu de la nature de la faute commise &#8220;<\/em> et <em>&#8221; des ant\u00e9c\u00e9dents disciplinaires de l\u2019intim\u00e9, d\u00e9j\u00e0 sanctionn\u00e9 pour des faits commis quelques semaines plus t\u00f4t &#8220;<\/em>. Pour la proc\u00e9dure n\u00b02022000124 (insalubrit\u00e9 de la cellule), la faute du troisi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 justifie un avertissement, premi\u00e8re dans l\u2019\u00e9chelle des sanctions, et la cour \u00e9carte l\u2019argument tir\u00e9 de l\u2019absence de pr\u00e9judice pour autrui. Pour la proc\u00e9dure n\u00b02022000123 (refus d\u2019obtemp\u00e9rer), la faute du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 est sanctionn\u00e9e par trois jours de cellule avec sursis, \u00e9galement jug\u00e9e proportionn\u00e9e. La cour exerce un contr\u00f4le entier sur la qualification des faits et la proportionnalit\u00e9, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 sa mission de juge de l\u2019exc\u00e8s de pouvoir. Elle reprend \u00e0 son compte la jurisprudence selon laquelle il lui appartient de rechercher si les faits constituent une faute et si la sanction retenue n\u2019est pas disproportionn\u00e9e. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les sanctions apparaissent mesur\u00e9es au regard de la gravit\u00e9 des manquements et du comportement r\u00e9it\u00e9r\u00e9 du d\u00e9tenu. Ce faisant, la cour confirme que le pouvoir disciplinaire de l\u2019administration p\u00e9nitentiaire n\u2019est pas arbitraire mais soumis \u00e0 un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel effectif. La d\u00e9cision illustre ainsi un \u00e9quilibre entre la n\u00e9cessaire autorit\u00e9 au sein des \u00e9tablissements et la protection des droits fondamentaux des personnes d\u00e9tenues.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68ca5a21892376614a83452f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Chambre sociale, le 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b023-23.830<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679c688d0eb488d744569cfa\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Riom, le 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/00942<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4829,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7123,6580,7593,6718,6992],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1235336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-droit-du-travail","category-droit-social","category-juridictions-administratives","category-social","category-travail"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour administrative d&#039;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour administrative d&#039;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6240\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1622,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Droit du travail\",\"Droit Social\",\"Juridictions administratives\",\"Social\",\"Travail\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit du travail\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit Social\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Juridictions administratives\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Social\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Travail\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00\",\"description\":\"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6240,\"height\":4160},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552","og_description":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6240,"height":4160,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629":"Kohen","\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"8 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552","datePublished":"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/"},"wordCount":1622,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Droit du travail","Droit Social","Juridictions administratives","Social","Travail"],"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit du travail"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit Social"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Juridictions administratives"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Social"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Travail"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/","name":"Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-03T04:06:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-03T04:23:16+00:00","description":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille, dans un arr\u00eat du 29 juin 2026 (n\u00b025MA01552), \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un recours form\u00e9 par le garde des sceaux contre...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","width":6240,"height":4160},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-juin-2026-n25ma01552\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Marseille, le 29 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01552"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5bmM","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":807266,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-17-juin-1986-n86-997\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":0},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 17 juin 1986, n\u00b086-997","author":"Kohen","date":"1 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision le 17 juin 1986 relative \u00e0 la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 d\u2019une candidature \u00e9lectorale. Un candidat t\u00eate de liste dans...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":807280,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-1-avril-1986-n86-1000\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":1},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 1 avril 1986, n\u00b086-1000","author":"Kohen","date":"1 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 1er avril 1986, rejette la requ\u00eate d'un candidat contestant la r\u00e9partition des si\u00e8ges lors des \u00e9lections...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":807983,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-7-novembre-1973-n73-712\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":2},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 7 novembre 1973, n\u00b073-712","author":"Kohen","date":"1 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 7 novembre 1973, a statu\u00e9 sur la contestation d'une \u00e9lection l\u00e9gislative dans la vingt-septi\u00e8me...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441512,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-de-cassation-le-27-janvier-2026-n25-85-427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":3},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 27 janvier 2026, n\u00b025-85.427","author":"","date":"4 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La chambre criminelle se prononce sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 incidente. Elle estime qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas lieu \u00e0 renvoi au Conseil...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":806563,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-1-juillet-1993-n93-1166\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":4},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 1 juillet 1993, n\u00b093-1166","author":"Kohen","date":"1 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0648\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision le 1er juillet 1993 dans le contentieux \u00e9lectoral de la premi\u00e8re circonscription de la C\u00f4te-d'Or. Une...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441271,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-17-532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1235336,"position":5},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-17.532","author":"","date":"4 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La d\u00e9cision du 28 janvier 2026 illustre le contr\u00f4le exerc\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation sur les d\u00e9cisions de rejet non sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9. Elle rappelle les...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-wHmB_RPpurI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1235336"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1235490,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1235336\/revisions\/1235490"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1235336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1235336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1235336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}