{"id":1236293,"date":"2026-07-03T08:05:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T06:05:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/"},"modified":"2026-07-03T08:05:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T06:05:33","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-de-fond-de-lhospitalisation-complete-sans-consentement\">I. Les conditions de fond de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sans consentement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lalteration-du-consentement-par-les-troubles-mentaux\">A. L\u2019alt\u00e9ration du consentement par les troubles mentaux<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-necessite-dune-surveillance-medicale-constante\">B. La n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-controle-procedural-et-loffice-du-juge\">II. Le contr\u00f4le proc\u00e9dural et l\u2019office du juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-regularite-de-la-saisine-et-le-respect-des-droits-proceduraux\">A. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la saisine et le respect des droits proc\u00e9duraux<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-souveraine-des-elements-medicaux-par-le-juge\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux par le juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/00570) relative au maintien d\u2019une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te en soins psychiatriques sans consentement. Un patient faisait l\u2019objet d\u2019une mesure de soins contraints sous cette forme depuis le 27 mars 2026. Le directeur de l\u2019\u00e9tablissement hospitalier a saisi le juge par requ\u00eate du 30 mars 2026 afin qu\u2019il se prononce sur la poursuite de la mesure. Le patient, le directeur, le tiers et le tuteur ont \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019audience. Le minist\u00e8re public a donn\u00e9 un avis \u00e9crit favorable \u00e0 la poursuite. Le juge a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sur le fondement de l\u2019article L.3212-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique, en retenant que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux \u00e9tablissent l\u2019existence de troubles mentaux rendant impossible le consentement et imposant une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante. La question de droit soumise au juge consistait \u00e0 d\u00e9terminer si les conditions l\u00e9gales de la poursuite de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sans consentement \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies au vu des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux produits. La solution retenue consacre une interpr\u00e9tation stricte des exigences de l\u2019article L.3212-1, en subordonnant la mesure \u00e0 la double d\u00e9monstration de l\u2019absence de consentement et de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une surveillance constante.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-de-fond-de-lhospitalisation-complete-sans-consentement\">I. Les conditions de fond de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sans consentement<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lalteration-du-consentement-par-les-troubles-mentaux\">A. L\u2019alt\u00e9ration du consentement par les troubles mentaux<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article L.3212-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique subordonne l\u2019hospitalisation sans consentement \u00e0 l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 pour la personne d\u2019exprimer un consentement \u00e9clair\u00e9 en raison de ses troubles mentaux. Le juge constate dans l\u2019esp\u00e8ce que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux des vingt-quatre et soixante-douze heures, ainsi que l\u2019avis motiv\u00e9 du 30 mars 2026, \u00e9tablissent que le patient pr\u00e9sente des troubles mentaux <em>&#8221; qui ne permettent pas un consentement r\u00e9el aux soins &#8220;<\/em>. Cette formulation reprend le crit\u00e8re l\u00e9gal en insistant sur le caract\u00e8re actuel et persistant de l\u2019alt\u00e9ration du discernement. Le juge ne se contente pas d\u2019une simple r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales ; il op\u00e8re un contr\u00f4le concret de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de l\u2019absence de consentement. La d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit ainsi dans la ligne d\u2019une jurisprudence qui exige une \u00e9valuation m\u00e9dicale r\u00e9cente et circonstanci\u00e9e, comme le rappelle la Cour d\u2019appel de Paris lorsqu\u2019elle valide le maintien des soins contraints <em>&#8221; au vu des derni\u00e8res constatations m\u00e9dicales et des d\u00e9bats \u00e0 l\u2019audience &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d276071f7ba53131fafe61\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 12 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00139)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge de Pontoise d\u00e9montre que l\u2019\u00e9tat du patient ne lui permet pas de consentir librement, condition indispensable pour d\u00e9roger au principe du consentement libre et \u00e9clair\u00e9 aux soins.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-necessite-dune-surveillance-medicale-constante\">B. La n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante<\/h3>\n<p>Outre l\u2019absence de consentement, l\u2019article L.3212-1 exige que l\u2019\u00e9tat mental impose des soins imm\u00e9diats assortis d\u2019une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante justifiant une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te. Le juge rel\u00e8ve que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux produits \u00e9tablissent la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une <em>&#8221; surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante &#8220;<\/em>. Il ne se borne pas \u00e0 reproduire la formule l\u00e9gale ; il la met en relation avec la persistance des troubles constat\u00e9s. Cette exigence de surveillance constante distingue l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te des autres formes de prise en charge, comme les programmes de soins. La d\u00e9cision confirme que la mesure la plus restrictive de libert\u00e9 ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e que lorsque la gravit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9tat du patient rend impossible toute alternative moins coercitive. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris souligne \u00e9galement la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de v\u00e9rifier <em>&#8221; la persistance des sympt\u00f4mes de sa pathologie &#8220;<\/em> pour justifier le maintien d\u2019une surveillance constante <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f6024d1c1a56b8e1651ec1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 8 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00198)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge de Pontoise se livre \u00e0 la m\u00eame appr\u00e9ciation in concreto, fondant sa d\u00e9cision sur des certificats r\u00e9cents qui attestent d\u2019un besoin continu de soins sous contrainte.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-controle-procedural-et-loffice-du-juge\">II. Le contr\u00f4le proc\u00e9dural et l\u2019office du juge<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-regularite-de-la-saisine-et-le-respect-des-droits-proceduraux\">A. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la saisine et le respect des droits proc\u00e9duraux<\/h3>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure de maintien de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te est encadr\u00e9e par des formalit\u00e9s strictes, destin\u00e9es \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger les droits du patient. Le juge v\u00e9rifie que la requ\u00eate \u00e9mane du directeur de l\u2019\u00e9tablissement, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article L.3211-12-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique. Il s\u2019assure \u00e9galement de la convocation r\u00e9guli\u00e8re des parties : le patient, le directeur, le tiers et le tuteur ont \u00e9t\u00e9 appel\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019audience. En outre, le minist\u00e8re public a formul\u00e9 un avis \u00e9crit favorable avant l\u2019audience. Ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments t\u00e9moignent d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure contradictoire respectueuse des garanties fondamentales. Le juge ne se contente pas d\u2019une simple v\u00e9rification formelle ; il mentionne express\u00e9ment chaque \u00e9tape, ce qui permet de s\u2019assurer de l\u2019absence de vice proc\u00e9dural. Cette vigilance s\u2019explique par la nature privative de libert\u00e9 de la mesure, qui requiert un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel rigoureux. Le respect des droits proc\u00e9duraux constitue une condition de validit\u00e9 de l\u2019ordonnance, comme le rappelle la jurisprudence constante en mati\u00e8re de soins psychiatriques sans consentement.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-souveraine-des-elements-medicaux-par-le-juge\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux par le juge<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention exerce un contr\u00f4le entier sur le bien-fond\u00e9 de la mesure. Il ne se limite pas \u00e0 ent\u00e9riner les avis m\u00e9dicaux ; il les examine et les confronte aux dispositions l\u00e9gales. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il constate que les certificats m\u00e9dicaux des vingt-quatre et soixante-douze heures, ainsi que l\u2019avis motiv\u00e9, attestent de troubles mentaux rendant impossible le consentement et imposant une surveillance constante. Il en d\u00e9duit que <em>&#8221; les conditions l\u00e9gales sont r\u00e9unies &#8220;<\/em> et fait droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate. Cette appr\u00e9ciation est souveraine, mais elle doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e. Le juge s\u2019appuie sur des pi\u00e8ces r\u00e9centes, ce qui garantit l\u2019actualit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9valuation m\u00e9dicale. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris adopte la m\u00eame d\u00e9marche lorsqu\u2019elle confirme une ordonnance de maintien en relevant <em>&#8221; les derni\u00e8res constatations m\u00e9dicales comme des d\u00e9bats \u00e0 l\u2019audience &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f6024d1c1a56b8e1651ec1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, 8 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00198)<\/a><\/strong>. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e s\u2019inscrit donc dans une pratique jurisprudentielle qui concilie le respect des droits du patient avec la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 th\u00e9rapeutique, sous le contr\u00f4le vigilant du juge.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d276071f7ba53131fafe61\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 12 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00139<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f6024d1c1a56b8e1651ec1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 8 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00198<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041613\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1302 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Tout paiement suppose une dette ; ce qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 re\u00e7u sans \u00eatre d\u00fb est sujet \u00e0 restitution. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La restitution n&#8217;est pas admise \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard des obligations naturelles qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 volontairement acquitt\u00e9es. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032024460\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1302-1 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Celui qui re\u00e7oit par erreur ou sciemment ce qui ne lui est pas d\u00fb doit le restituer \u00e0 celui de qui il l&#8217;a ind\u00fbment re\u00e7u.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000041721196\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 3212-1 du Code de la sant\u00e9 publique<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>I.-Une personne atteinte de troubles mentaux ne peut faire l&#8217;objet de soins psychiatriques sur la d\u00e9cision du directeur d&#8217;un \u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 que lorsque les deux conditions suivantes sont r\u00e9unies :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Ses troubles mentaux rendent impossible son consentement ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Son \u00e9tat mental impose des soins imm\u00e9diats assortis soit d&#8217;une surveillance m\u00e9dicale constante justifiant une hospitalisation compl\u00e8te, soit d&#8217;une surveillance m\u00e9dicale r\u00e9guli\u00e8re justifiant une prise en charge sous la forme mentionn\u00e9e au 2\u00b0 du I de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-1. <\/p>\n<p>II.-Le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement prononce la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Soit lorsqu&#8217;il a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par un membre de la famille du malade ou par une personne justifiant de l&#8217;existence de relations avec le malade ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la demande de soins et lui donnant qualit\u00e9 pour agir dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat de celui-ci, \u00e0 l&#8217;exclusion des personnels soignants exer\u00e7ant dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement prenant en charge la personne malade. Lorsqu&#8217;elle remplit les conditions pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent alin\u00e9a, la personne charg\u00e9e, \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard d&#8217;un majeur prot\u00e9g\u00e9, d&#8217;une mesure de protection juridique \u00e0 la personne peut faire une demande de soins pour celui-ci.<\/p>\n<p>La forme et le contenu de cette demande sont fix\u00e9s par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d&#8217;Etat.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission est accompagn\u00e9e de deux certificats m\u00e9dicaux circonstanci\u00e9s datant de moins de quinze jours, attestant que les conditions pr\u00e9vues aux 1\u00b0 et 2\u00b0 du I du pr\u00e9sent article sont r\u00e9unies.<\/p>\n<p>Le premier certificat m\u00e9dical ne peut \u00eatre \u00e9tabli que par un m\u00e9decin n&#8217;exer\u00e7ant pas dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant le malade ; il constate l&#8217;\u00e9tat mental de la personne malade, indique les caract\u00e9ristiques de sa maladie et la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de recevoir des soins. Il doit \u00eatre confirm\u00e9 par un certificat d&#8217;un second m\u00e9decin qui peut exercer dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant le malade. Les deux m\u00e9decins ne peuvent \u00eatre parents ou alli\u00e9s, au quatri\u00e8me degr\u00e9 inclusivement, ni entre eux, ni du directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 3222-1 qui prononce la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;admission, ni de la personne ayant demand\u00e9 les soins ou de la personne faisant l&#8217;objet de ces soins ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Soit lorsqu&#8217;il s&#8217;av\u00e8re impossible d&#8217;obtenir une demande dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues au 1\u00b0 du pr\u00e9sent II et qu&#8217;il existe, \u00e0 la date d&#8217;admission, un p\u00e9ril imminent pour la sant\u00e9 de la personne, d\u00fbment constat\u00e9 par un certificat m\u00e9dical \u00e9tabli dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues au troisi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du m\u00eame 1\u00b0. Ce certificat constate l&#8217;\u00e9tat mental de la personne malade, indique les caract\u00e9ristiques de sa maladie et la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de recevoir des soins. Le m\u00e9decin qui \u00e9tablit ce certificat ne peut exercer dans l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement accueillant la personne malade ; il ne peut en outre \u00eatre parent ou alli\u00e9, jusqu&#8217;au quatri\u00e8me degr\u00e9 inclusivement, ni avec le directeur de cet \u00e9tablissement ni avec la personne malade.<\/p>\n<p>Dans ce cas, le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement d&#8217;accueil informe, dans un d\u00e9lai de vingt-quatre heures sauf difficult\u00e9s particuli\u00e8res, la famille de la personne qui fait l&#8217;objet de soins et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, la personne charg\u00e9e de la protection juridique de l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ou, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut, toute personne justifiant de l&#8217;existence de relations avec la personne malade ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 l&#8217;admission en soins et lui donnant qualit\u00e9 pour agir dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat de celle-ci.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque l&#8217;admission a \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9e en application du pr\u00e9sent 2\u00b0, les certificats m\u00e9dicaux mentionn\u00e9s aux deuxi\u00e8me et troisi\u00e8me alin\u00e9as de l&#8217;article L. 3211-2-2 sont \u00e9tablis par deux psychiatres distincts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4734,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cadccccdc6046d478cd417","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cadccccdc6046d478cd417","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cadccccdc6046d478cd417","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Pontoise","_kj_chambre":"JLD","_kj_rg":"26\/00570","_kj_date":"2026-03-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1236293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5348\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3565\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00570\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1954,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00570\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00570 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5348,\"height\":3565},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00570\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ar\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5348,"height":3565,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629":"Kohen","\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"9 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570","datePublished":"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/"},"wordCount":1954,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-03T06:05:33+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en la personne de son juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 30 mars 2026 une ordonnance...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","width":5348,"height":3565},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-30-mars-2026-n26-00570\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/%d9%85%d8%ad%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b5%d8%b5%d9%88%d9%86-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a8%d8%a7\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 30 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00570"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5bCd","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":497309,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-28-novembre-2025-n25-00343\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00343","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rend une ordonnance le 30 octobre 2025. Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 et des particuliers \u00e9taient en...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kevin-delval-JCjXLkyk6Kw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491411,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-17-novembre-2025-n25-00629\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00629","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, par jugement du 17 novembre 2025, a statu\u00e9 sur une action en recouvrement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat demandait le...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-h5RH0srRrwY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":489805,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-20-novembre-2025-n19-06130\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 20 novembre 2025, n\u00b019\/06130","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant le 20 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 la carence d'un notaire d\u00e9sign\u00e9 dans une proc\u00e9dure de partage. Le juge commis...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492448,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-00046\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00046","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Juge des Contentieux de la Protection de Pontoise, le 13 novembre 2025, statue sur une demande en paiement d'un solde d\u00e9biteur. Le d\u00e9fendeur ne...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492889,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-12-novembre-2025-n25-00177\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 12 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00177","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 12 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande en paiement provisionnel et la constatation de la...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mana5280-BxTlFRk-FPg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491376,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pontoise-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-00008\/","url_meta":{"origin":1236293,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00008","author":"Kohen","date":"8 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644\u060c 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 18 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 la demande d\u2019un syndicat mixte. Ce dernier, propri\u00e9taire de terrains...","rel":"","context":"\u0641\u064a &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/valeria-m-zgvMPH83znI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1236293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1236293\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1236293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1236293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1236293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}