{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO3467 Hoge Raad , 30-03-2004 \/ 01839\/03","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xUEaTfCDnk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao3467-hoge-raad-30-03-2004-01839-03\/\">ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO3467 Hoge Raad , 30-03-2004 \/ 01839\/03<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2004ao3467-hoge-raad-30-03-2004-01839-03\/embed\/#?secret=xUEaTfCDnk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO3467 Hoge Raad , 30-03-2004 \/ 01839\/03&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"xUEaTfCDnk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Toepassing art. 279 Sv; overgangssituatie. In hoger beroep verschijnt telkens alleen een raadsman\/vrouw. Na de tweede behandelingsdag is het arrest HR NJ 2002, 77 gewezen (verdediging bij verstek alleen door gemachtigde raadsman). Er vanuit gaande dat de verdediging met dat arrest bekend was, lag het op haar weg aanhouding van de behandeling te verzoeken voor het alsnog verkrijgen van de vereis..."}