{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"Helsingin HO 26.3.2025 103202 - Itsekriminointisuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4mP8X8Ab9C\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-26-3-2025-103202-itsekriminointisuoja\/\">Helsingin HO 26.3.2025 103202 &#8211; Itsekriminointisuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-26-3-2025-103202-itsekriminointisuoja\/embed\/#?secret=4mP8X8Ab9C\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Helsingin HO 26.3.2025 103202 &#8211; Itsekriminointisuoja&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"4mP8X8Ab9C\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"\u200dVastaajat olivat riidattomasti tuoneet Euroopan unionin ulkopuolelta per\u00e4isin olevia savukkeita Virosta Suomeen. Savukkeet oli takavarikoitu Tullin toimesta. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli lukenut vastaajien syyksi t\u00f6rke\u00e4n veropetoksen arvonlis\u00e4veron ja tupakkaveron v\u00e4ltt\u00e4misest\u00e4 ja hyl\u00e4nnyt syytteen tulliveron v\u00e4ltt\u00e4mist\u00e4 koskien n\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00f6m\u00e4n\u00e4. Syytt\u00e4j\u00e4 vaati valituksessaan, ett\u00e4 vastaajat tuomitaan syytteen mukaisesti my\u00f6s tulliveron v\u00e4ltt\u00e4mist\u00e4 koskien. Hovioikeus tutki viran puolesta ratkaisun KKO 2024:39 vaikutuksen..."}