{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"KKO VL:2025-214 - Judiciaire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DyCq90PS4j\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-214-judiciaire\/\">KKO VL:2025-214 &#8211; Judiciaire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-214-judiciaire\/embed\/#?secret=DyCq90PS4j\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;KKO VL:2025-214 &#8211; Judiciaire&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"DyCq90PS4j\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys esitutkintalain 3 luvun 11 \u00a7:n 2 momentissa s\u00e4\u00e4detyn kiireellisyysperusteen merkityksest\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisen arvioimisessa. Kysymys my\u00f6s siit\u00e4, oliko vasta hovioikeudessa todettu viiv\u00e4styminen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tt\u00e4v\u00e4 hyvitett\u00e4v\u00e4ksi rahana, kun viiv\u00e4stymisen hyvitt\u00e4mist\u00e4 vaatineet vastaajat eiv\u00e4t olleet hakeneet muutosta k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden tuomitsemaan rangaistukseen. Valituslupakortti sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 kuvauksen siit\u00e4 kysymyksest\u00e4, johon liittyen asiassa on my\u00f6nnetty valituslupa. Sen sis\u00e4lt\u00f6 ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eik\u00e4..."}