{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"KKO VL:2025-69 - Judiciaire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eJmH5Saq7T\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-69-judiciaire\/\">KKO VL:2025-69 &#8211; Judiciaire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-69-judiciaire\/embed\/#?secret=eJmH5Saq7T\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;KKO VL:2025-69 &#8211; Judiciaire&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"eJmH5Saq7T\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"A oli nostanut B:t\u00e4 vastaan osakeyhti\u00f6lain 23 luvun 1 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitetun osakkeiden lunastamista koskevan kanteen sek\u00e4 C Oy:t\u00e4 vastaan saman luvun 2 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitetun selvitystilaan m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4mist\u00e4 koskevan kanteen. B, jolla oli aikaisempi asiakassuhde asianajajaan, oli antanut t\u00e4lle toimeksiannon toimia yhti\u00f6n asiamiehen\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4ynniss\u00e4. Kysymys oikeudenk\u00e4yntiasiamiehen esteellisyydest\u00e4 sek\u00e4 esiintymiskieltoon m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4misen edellytyksist\u00e4. Valituslupakortti sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 kuvauksen siit\u00e4 kysymyksest\u00e4, johon..."}