{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"KKO:2024:57 - Yrityssaneeraus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ugABjN6FkD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko202457-yrityssaneeraus\/\">KKO:2024:57 &#8211; Yrityssaneeraus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/kko202457-yrityssaneeraus\/embed\/#?secret=ugABjN6FkD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;KKO:2024:57 &#8211; Yrityssaneeraus&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"ugABjN6FkD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Velallisyrityksess\u00e4 oli havaittu, ett\u00e4 yrityst\u00e4 v\u00e4hint\u00e4\u00e4nkin uhkasi maksukyvytt\u00f6myys, ja p\u00e4\u00e4tetty hakea saneerausmenettelyn aloittamista. Velallisyritys oli t\u00e4m\u00e4n j\u00e4lkeen ennen hakemuksen vireille tuloa vajaan kuukauden aikana velkaantunut liiketoiminnassaan merkitt\u00e4v\u00e4sti tavarantoimittajalleen, jolle ei ollut kerrottu velallisyrityksen heikosta taloudellisesta tilanteesta tai aikeesta hakea saneerausta. Korkeimman oikeuden ratkaisusta ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla asiassa ei ollut perusteltua syyt\u00e4 olettaa, ett\u00e4 saneeraushakemuksen p\u00e4\u00e4asiallisena tarkoituksena..."}