{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","title":"TT 2023:23 - L\u00e4ht\u00f6paikka","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ATLBYsxTfU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/tt-202323-lahtopaikka\/\">TT 2023:23 &#8211; L\u00e4ht\u00f6paikka<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/tt-202323-lahtopaikka\/embed\/#?secret=ATLBYsxTfU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;TT 2023:23 &#8211; L\u00e4ht\u00f6paikka&#8221; &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"ATLBYsxTfU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys veturimiesteht\u00e4vi\u00e4 rautatieliikenteess\u00e4 koskevan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen tulkinnasta tilanteessa, jossa ty\u00f6nantaja oli p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 osa veturinkuljettajien ty\u00f6vuoroista alkaa varikon miehist\u00f6tilojen sijaan rautatieasemalta ja p\u00e4\u00e4ttyy sinne. Tuomiosta tarkemmin ilmenevin perustein katsottiin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja ei ollut menetellyt asiassa ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen vastaisesti. Varikon ja aseman v\u00e4list\u00e4 kulkemista tai kodin ja aseman v\u00e4list\u00e4 kulkemista ei my\u00f6sk\u00e4\u00e4n tullut kanteessa tarkoitetuissa olosuhteissa lukea ty\u00f6ajaksi...."}