{"id":1001621,"date":"2026-05-28T11:26:39","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T09:26:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T11:26:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T09:26:48","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: MENDES COELHO. I &#8211; O n\u00ba2 do art. 1211\u00ba do C. Civil [\u201cO pre\u00e7o deve ser pago, n\u00e3o havendo cl\u00e1usula ou uso em contr\u00e1rio, no acto de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d], integrando uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o de natureza supletiva, leva a que as partes possam \u201cestipular o pagamento do pre\u00e7o em qualquer outro momento &#8211; desde a conclus\u00e3o do contrato at\u00e9 uma data posterior \u00e0 aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d. II &#8211; Se o pagamento do restante pre\u00e7o s\u00f3 era exig\u00edvel ou passava a ser devido ap\u00f3s a aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras dos produtos fabricados pela autora, competia a esta alegar e provar, como facto constitutivo do seu direito (art. 342\u00ba n\u00ba1 do C. Civil), que tal aprova\u00e7\u00e3o entretanto ocorreu. III &#8211; No limite, ainda que aquela aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras n\u00e3o estivesse nas suas m\u00e3os e estivesse antes nas m\u00e3os da r\u00e9, sempre pelo menos teria que provar que, eventualmente, a mesma s\u00f3 n\u00e3o ocorreu por motivo imput\u00e1vel \u00e0 r\u00e9, alegando para tal factos nesse sentido e que pudessem ser sancionados, por exemplo, em sede da observ\u00e2ncia da boa f\u00e9 no cumprimento do contrato e\/ou atrav\u00e9s da figura do abuso do direito (arts. 762\u00ba n\u00ba2 e 334\u00ba do C.Civil).<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrp.nsf\/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf\/9adb918ea8f0f0f880258dfd00526ba0?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: MENDES COELHO. I &#8211; O n\u00ba2 do art. 1211\u00ba do C. Civil [\u201cO pre\u00e7o deve ser pago, n\u00e3o havendo cl\u00e1usula ou uso em contr\u00e1rio, no acto de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d], integrando uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o de natureza supletiva, leva a que as partes possam \u201cestipular o pagamento do pre\u00e7o em qualquer outro momento &#8211; desde a conclus\u00e3o do contrato at\u00e9 uma data posterior \u00e0 aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d. II &#8211; Se o pagamento do restante pre\u00e7o s\u00f3 era exig\u00edvel ou passava a ser devido ap\u00f3s a aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras dos produtos fabricados pela autora, competia a esta alegar e provar, como facto constitutivo do seu direito (art. 342\u00ba n\u00ba1 do C. Civil), que tal aprova\u00e7\u00e3o entretanto ocorreu. III &#8211; No limite, ainda que aquela aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras n\u00e3o estivesse nas suas m\u00e3os e estivesse antes nas m\u00e3os da r\u00e9, sempre pelo menos teria que provar que, eventualmente, a mesma s\u00f3 n\u00e3o ocorreu por motivo imput\u00e1vel \u00e0 r\u00e9, alegando para tal factos nesse sentido e que pudessem ser sancionados, por exemplo, em sede da observ\u00e2ncia da boa f\u00e9 no cumprimento do contrato e\/ou atrav\u00e9s da figura do abuso do direito (arts. 762\u00ba n\u00ba2 e 334\u00ba do C.Civil).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[110575],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,16616,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1001621","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-porto","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MENDES COELHO. I - O n\u00ba2 do art. 1211\u00ba do C. Civil [\u201cO pre\u00e7o deve ser pago, n\u00e3o havendo cl\u00e1usula ou uso em contr\u00e1rio, no acto de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d], integrando uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o de natureza supletiva, leva a que as partes possam \u201cestipular o pagamento do pre\u00e7o em qualquer outro momento - desde a conclus\u00e3o do contrato at\u00e9 uma data posterior \u00e0 aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d. II - Se o pagamento do restante pre\u00e7o s\u00f3 era exig\u00edvel ou passava a ser devido ap\u00f3s a aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras dos produtos fabricados pela autora, competia a esta alegar e provar, como facto constitutivo do seu direito (art. 342\u00ba n\u00ba1 do C. Civil), que tal aprova\u00e7\u00e3o entretanto ocorreu. III - No limite, ainda que aquela aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras n\u00e3o estivesse nas suas m\u00e3os e estivesse antes nas m\u00e3os da r\u00e9, sempre pelo menos teria que provar que, eventualmente, a mesma s\u00f3 n\u00e3o ocorreu por motivo imput\u00e1vel \u00e0 r\u00e9, alegando para tal factos nesse sentido e que pudessem ser sancionados, por exemplo, em sede da observ\u00e2ncia da boa f\u00e9 no cumprimento do contrato e\/ou atrav\u00e9s da figura do abuso do direito (arts. 762\u00ba n\u00ba2 e 334\u00ba do C.Civil).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T09:26:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\\\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T09:26:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-28T09:26:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\\\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13","og_description":"Relator: MENDES COELHO. I - O n\u00ba2 do art. 1211\u00ba do C. Civil [\u201cO pre\u00e7o deve ser pago, n\u00e3o havendo cl\u00e1usula ou uso em contr\u00e1rio, no acto de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d], integrando uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o de natureza supletiva, leva a que as partes possam \u201cestipular o pagamento do pre\u00e7o em qualquer outro momento - desde a conclus\u00e3o do contrato at\u00e9 uma data posterior \u00e0 aceita\u00e7\u00e3o da obra\u201d. II - Se o pagamento do restante pre\u00e7o s\u00f3 era exig\u00edvel ou passava a ser devido ap\u00f3s a aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras dos produtos fabricados pela autora, competia a esta alegar e provar, como facto constitutivo do seu direito (art. 342\u00ba n\u00ba1 do C. Civil), que tal aprova\u00e7\u00e3o entretanto ocorreu. III - No limite, ainda que aquela aprova\u00e7\u00e3o das amostras n\u00e3o estivesse nas suas m\u00e3os e estivesse antes nas m\u00e3os da r\u00e9, sempre pelo menos teria que provar que, eventualmente, a mesma s\u00f3 n\u00e3o ocorreu por motivo imput\u00e1vel \u00e0 r\u00e9, alegando para tal factos nesse sentido e que pudessem ser sancionados, por exemplo, em sede da observ\u00e2ncia da boa f\u00e9 no cumprimento do contrato e\/ou atrav\u00e9s da figura do abuso do direito (arts. 762\u00ba n\u00ba2 e 334\u00ba do C.Civil).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-28T09:26:48+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T09:26:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-28T09:26:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2573-24-3t8mai-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2573\/24.3T8MAI.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1001621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1001621"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1001621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}