{"id":1001631,"date":"2026-05-28T11:27:18","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T09:27:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T11:27:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T09:27:22","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: NUNO PIRES SALPICO. I – Nos termos do art. 204\u00ba n\u00ba 1 al\u00ednea c) do CPP o previs\u00edvel comportamento do arguido apenas respeita ao perigo de continua\u00e7\u00e3o da atividade criminosa, o qual \u00e9, por completo, aut\u00f3nomo do perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, fundando-se este na personalidade do arguido, na natureza e circunst\u00e2ncias do crime. II – O perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas n\u00e3o colide com o princ\u00edpio da presun\u00e7\u00e3o de inoc\u00eancia, colis\u00e3o por supostamente integrar exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00f3prias das penas. Diversamente, defender a validade da norma (n\u00facleo central das exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o geral), \u00e9 um fim que nada tem de cautelar, apenas opera com o tr\u00e2nsito em julgado da pena, consolidando o sentimento comunit\u00e1rio de confian\u00e7a na norma, no tipo de pena escolhida e dimensionamento da medida concreta. A afirma\u00e7\u00e3o da confian\u00e7a da comunidade na norma \u00e9 um \u201cquid normativo\u201d muito distinto da prote\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, imediatas ao cometimento de um crime. III – Acautelar o perigo de perturba\u00e7\u00e3o grave da tranquilidade p\u00fablica cabe diretamente \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o dos Tribunais, enquanto \u00f3rg\u00e3o decisor da justi\u00e7a provis\u00f3ria ou final (cada uma destas justi\u00e7as representa dimens\u00f5es distintas), e n\u00e3o \u00e0s for\u00e7as policiais. Somente uma decis\u00e3o judicial provis\u00f3ria poder\u00e1 deter a como\u00e7\u00e3o popular, ou o receio da comunidade. (Sum\u00e1rio da responsabilidade do Relator)<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: NUNO PIRES SALPICO. I – Nos termos do art. 204\u00ba n\u00ba 1 al\u00ednea c) do CPP o previs\u00edvel comportamento do arguido apenas respeita ao perigo de continua\u00e7\u00e3o da atividade criminosa, o qual \u00e9, por completo, aut\u00f3nomo do perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, fundando-se este na personalidade do arguido, na natureza e circunst\u00e2ncias do crime. II – O perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas n\u00e3o colide com o princ\u00edpio da presun\u00e7\u00e3o de inoc\u00eancia, colis\u00e3o por supostamente integrar exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00f3prias das penas. Diversamente, defender a validade da norma (n\u00facleo central das exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o geral), \u00e9 um fim que nada tem de cautelar, apenas opera com o tr\u00e2nsito em julgado da pena, consolidando o sentimento comunit\u00e1rio de confian\u00e7a na norma, no tipo de pena escolhida e dimensionamento da medida concreta. A afirma\u00e7\u00e3o da confian\u00e7a da comunidade na norma \u00e9 um \u201cquid normativo\u201d muito distinto da prote\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, imediatas ao cometimento de um crime. III – Acautelar o perigo de perturba\u00e7\u00e3o grave da tranquilidade p\u00fablica cabe diretamente \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o dos Tribunais, enquanto \u00f3rg\u00e3o decisor da justi\u00e7a provis\u00f3ria ou final (cada uma destas justi\u00e7as representa dimens\u00f5es distintas), e n\u00e3o \u00e0s for\u00e7as policiais. Somente uma decis\u00e3o judicial provis\u00f3ria poder\u00e1 deter a como\u00e7\u00e3o popular, ou o receio da comunidade. (Sum\u00e1rio da responsabilidade do Relator)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[110575],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,51417,110595,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1001631","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-sfprt-m","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: NUNO PIRES SALPICO. I - Nos termos do art. 204\u00ba n\u00ba 1 al\u00ednea c) do CPP o previs\u00edvel comportamento do arguido apenas respeita ao perigo de continua\u00e7\u00e3o da atividade criminosa, o qual \u00e9, por completo, aut\u00f3nomo do perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, fundando-se este na personalidade do arguido, na natureza e circunst\u00e2ncias do crime. II - O perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas n\u00e3o colide com o princ\u00edpio da presun\u00e7\u00e3o de inoc\u00eancia, colis\u00e3o por supostamente integrar exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00f3prias das penas. Diversamente, defender a validade da norma (n\u00facleo central das exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o geral), \u00e9 um fim que nada tem de cautelar, apenas opera com o tr\u00e2nsito em julgado da pena, consolidando o sentimento comunit\u00e1rio de confian\u00e7a na norma, no tipo de pena escolhida e dimensionamento da medida concreta. A afirma\u00e7\u00e3o da confian\u00e7a da comunidade na norma \u00e9 um \u201cquid normativo\u201d muito distinto da prote\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, imediatas ao cometimento de um crime. III - Acautelar o perigo de perturba\u00e7\u00e3o grave da tranquilidade p\u00fablica cabe diretamente \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o dos Tribunais, enquanto \u00f3rg\u00e3o decisor da justi\u00e7a provis\u00f3ria ou final (cada uma destas justi\u00e7as representa dimens\u00f5es distintas), e n\u00e3o \u00e0s for\u00e7as policiais. Somente uma decis\u00e3o judicial provis\u00f3ria poder\u00e1 deter a como\u00e7\u00e3o popular, ou o receio da comunidade. (Sum\u00e1rio da responsabilidade do Relator)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T09:27:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\\\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T09:27:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-28T09:27:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\\\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13","og_description":"Relator: NUNO PIRES SALPICO. I - Nos termos do art. 204\u00ba n\u00ba 1 al\u00ednea c) do CPP o previs\u00edvel comportamento do arguido apenas respeita ao perigo de continua\u00e7\u00e3o da atividade criminosa, o qual \u00e9, por completo, aut\u00f3nomo do perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, fundando-se este na personalidade do arguido, na natureza e circunst\u00e2ncias do crime. II - O perigo de grave perturba\u00e7\u00e3o da ordem e tranquilidade p\u00fablicas n\u00e3o colide com o princ\u00edpio da presun\u00e7\u00e3o de inoc\u00eancia, colis\u00e3o por supostamente integrar exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00f3prias das penas. Diversamente, defender a validade da norma (n\u00facleo central das exig\u00eancias de preven\u00e7\u00e3o geral), \u00e9 um fim que nada tem de cautelar, apenas opera com o tr\u00e2nsito em julgado da pena, consolidando o sentimento comunit\u00e1rio de confian\u00e7a na norma, no tipo de pena escolhida e dimensionamento da medida concreta. A afirma\u00e7\u00e3o da confian\u00e7a da comunidade na norma \u00e9 um \u201cquid normativo\u201d muito distinto da prote\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da tranquilidade p\u00fablicas, imediatas ao cometimento de um crime. III - Acautelar o perigo de perturba\u00e7\u00e3o grave da tranquilidade p\u00fablica cabe diretamente \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o dos Tribunais, enquanto \u00f3rg\u00e3o decisor da justi\u00e7a provis\u00f3ria ou final (cada uma destas justi\u00e7as representa dimens\u00f5es distintas), e n\u00e3o \u00e0s for\u00e7as policiais. Somente uma decis\u00e3o judicial provis\u00f3ria poder\u00e1 deter a como\u00e7\u00e3o popular, ou o receio da comunidade. (Sum\u00e1rio da responsabilidade do Relator)","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-28T09:27:22+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T09:27:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-28T09:27:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-40-22-9sfprt-m-p2-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 40\/22.9SFPRT-M.P2 \u2013 2026-05-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1001631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1001631"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1001631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}