{"id":1001943,"date":"2026-05-28T12:21:38","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:21:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T12:21:38","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:21:38","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I – A declara\u00e7\u00e3o de insolv\u00eancia determina a suspens\u00e3o das execu\u00e7\u00f5es intentadas por credores da insolv\u00eancia que atinjam bens integrantes da massa insolvente, nos termos do art. 88.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE. II – A circunst\u00e2ncia de uma quantia se encontrar penhorada em execu\u00e7\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o basta, por si s\u00f3, para a considerar apreendida para a massa insolvente. III – A apreens\u00e3o para a massa insolvente exige acto processual pr\u00f3prio, v\u00e1lido e tempestivo, n\u00e3o se confundindo com a penhora realizada em processo executivo. IV – Encerrado o processo de insolv\u00eancia por insufici\u00eancia da massa, n\u00e3o pode ser ordenada a remessa ao processo de insolv\u00eancia de quantia que n\u00e3o foi oportunamente apreendida para a massa insolvente. V – Admitido liminarmente o incidente de exonera\u00e7\u00e3o do passivo restante e estando em curso o per\u00edodo de cess\u00e3o, o art. 242.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE impede execu\u00e7\u00f5es sobre bens do devedor destinadas \u00e0 satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9ditos sobre a insolv\u00eancia. VI – A regra da precipuidade das custas da execu\u00e7\u00e3o, prevista no art. 541.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Processo Civil, n\u00e3o pode ser confundida com a possibilidade de satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o do cr\u00e9dito exequendo. VII – Extinta a execu\u00e7\u00e3o e inexistindo fundamento legal para diferente afecta\u00e7\u00e3o da quantia penhorada, deve ser levantada a penhora e restitu\u00eddo o valor \u00e0 executada.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I – A declara\u00e7\u00e3o de insolv\u00eancia determina a suspens\u00e3o das execu\u00e7\u00f5es intentadas por credores da insolv\u00eancia que atinjam bens integrantes da massa insolvente, nos termos do art. 88.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE. II – A circunst\u00e2ncia de uma quantia se encontrar penhorada em execu\u00e7\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o basta, por si s\u00f3, para a considerar apreendida para a massa insolvente. III – A apreens\u00e3o para a massa insolvente exige acto processual pr\u00f3prio, v\u00e1lido e tempestivo, n\u00e3o se confundindo com a penhora realizada em processo executivo. IV – Encerrado o processo de insolv\u00eancia por insufici\u00eancia da massa, n\u00e3o pode ser ordenada a remessa ao processo de insolv\u00eancia de quantia que n\u00e3o foi oportunamente apreendida para a massa insolvente. V – Admitido liminarmente o incidente de exonera\u00e7\u00e3o do passivo restante e estando em curso o per\u00edodo de cess\u00e3o, o art. 242.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE impede execu\u00e7\u00f5es sobre bens do devedor destinadas \u00e0 satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9ditos sobre a insolv\u00eancia. VI – A regra da precipuidade das custas da execu\u00e7\u00e3o, prevista no art. 541.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Processo Civil, n\u00e3o pode ser confundida com a possibilidade de satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o do cr\u00e9dito exequendo. VII – Extinta a execu\u00e7\u00e3o e inexistindo fundamento legal para diferente afecta\u00e7\u00e3o da quantia penhorada, deve ser levantada a penhora e restitu\u00eddo o valor \u00e0 executada.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[110575],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,12992,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1001943","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-mai-a","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I - A declara\u00e7\u00e3o de insolv\u00eancia determina a suspens\u00e3o das execu\u00e7\u00f5es intentadas por credores da insolv\u00eancia que atinjam bens integrantes da massa insolvente, nos termos do art. 88.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE. II - A circunst\u00e2ncia de uma quantia se encontrar penhorada em execu\u00e7\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o basta, por si s\u00f3, para a considerar apreendida para a massa insolvente. III - A apreens\u00e3o para a massa insolvente exige acto processual pr\u00f3prio, v\u00e1lido e tempestivo, n\u00e3o se confundindo com a penhora realizada em processo executivo. IV - Encerrado o processo de insolv\u00eancia por insufici\u00eancia da massa, n\u00e3o pode ser ordenada a remessa ao processo de insolv\u00eancia de quantia que n\u00e3o foi oportunamente apreendida para a massa insolvente. V - Admitido liminarmente o incidente de exonera\u00e7\u00e3o do passivo restante e estando em curso o per\u00edodo de cess\u00e3o, o art. 242.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE impede execu\u00e7\u00f5es sobre bens do devedor destinadas \u00e0 satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9ditos sobre a insolv\u00eancia. VI - A regra da precipuidade das custas da execu\u00e7\u00e3o, prevista no art. 541.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Processo Civil, n\u00e3o pode ser confundida com a possibilidade de satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o do cr\u00e9dito exequendo. VII - Extinta a execu\u00e7\u00e3o e inexistindo fundamento legal para diferente afecta\u00e7\u00e3o da quantia penhorada, deve ser levantada a penhora e restitu\u00eddo o valor \u00e0 executada.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\\\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T10:21:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\\\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13","og_description":"Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I - A declara\u00e7\u00e3o de insolv\u00eancia determina a suspens\u00e3o das execu\u00e7\u00f5es intentadas por credores da insolv\u00eancia que atinjam bens integrantes da massa insolvente, nos termos do art. 88.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE. II - A circunst\u00e2ncia de uma quantia se encontrar penhorada em execu\u00e7\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o basta, por si s\u00f3, para a considerar apreendida para a massa insolvente. III - A apreens\u00e3o para a massa insolvente exige acto processual pr\u00f3prio, v\u00e1lido e tempestivo, n\u00e3o se confundindo com a penhora realizada em processo executivo. IV - Encerrado o processo de insolv\u00eancia por insufici\u00eancia da massa, n\u00e3o pode ser ordenada a remessa ao processo de insolv\u00eancia de quantia que n\u00e3o foi oportunamente apreendida para a massa insolvente. V - Admitido liminarmente o incidente de exonera\u00e7\u00e3o do passivo restante e estando em curso o per\u00edodo de cess\u00e3o, o art. 242.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CIRE impede execu\u00e7\u00f5es sobre bens do devedor destinadas \u00e0 satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9ditos sobre a insolv\u00eancia. VI - A regra da precipuidade das custas da execu\u00e7\u00e3o, prevista no art. 541.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Processo Civil, n\u00e3o pode ser confundida com a possibilidade de satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o do cr\u00e9dito exequendo. VII - Extinta a execu\u00e7\u00e3o e inexistindo fundamento legal para diferente afecta\u00e7\u00e3o da quantia penhorada, deve ser levantada a penhora e restitu\u00eddo o valor \u00e0 executada.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T10:21:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-1031-24-0t8mai-a-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 1031\/24.0T8MAI-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1001943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1001943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1001943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}