{"id":1001948,"date":"2026-05-28T12:22:02","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T12:22:02","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:22:02","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ARTUR DION\u00cdSIO OLIVEIRA. I &#8211; O adiamento da audi\u00eancia com fundamento em justo impedimento, ao abrigo do artigo 603.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CPC, depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o de factos suscept\u00edveis integrar os respectivos pressupostos &#8211; a ocorr\u00eancia de um evento imprevis\u00edvel, a impossibilidade de compar\u00eancia dele decorrente e a aus\u00eancia de culpa da parte e do mandat\u00e1rio &#8211; e da apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da respectiva prova ou da alega\u00e7\u00e3o da impossibilidade de fazer de imediato. II &#8211; A comina\u00e7\u00e3o prevista no artigo 35.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 2, do CIRE n\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel quando Tribunal julgue procedente a justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta que o devedor apresente. III &#8211; A justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta a acto processual depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o e da prova de um motivo razo\u00e1vel que permita aferir a impossibilidade ou o grave inconveniente no comparecimento da pessoa convocada. IV &#8211; Na fase inicial do processo de insolv\u00eancia, o princ\u00edpio do inquisit\u00f3rio s\u00f3 opera quando o juiz seja chamado a decidir quest\u00e3o controvertida entre as partes. V &#8211; Tal n\u00e3o sucede quando o devedor se tiver apresentado \u00e0 insolv\u00eancia, quando n\u00e3o deduzir oposi\u00e7\u00e3o ao pedido de insolv\u00eancia deduzido contra si ou quando n\u00e3o comparecer na audi\u00eancia de julgamento.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrp.nsf\/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf\/2d7794a94f77886180258dff00492515?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ARTUR DION\u00cdSIO OLIVEIRA. I &#8211; O adiamento da audi\u00eancia com fundamento em justo impedimento, ao abrigo do artigo 603.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CPC, depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o de factos suscept\u00edveis integrar os respectivos pressupostos &#8211; a ocorr\u00eancia de um evento imprevis\u00edvel, a impossibilidade de compar\u00eancia dele decorrente e a aus\u00eancia de culpa da parte e do mandat\u00e1rio &#8211; e da apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da respectiva prova ou da alega\u00e7\u00e3o da impossibilidade de fazer de imediato. II &#8211; A comina\u00e7\u00e3o prevista no artigo 35.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 2, do CIRE n\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel quando Tribunal julgue procedente a justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta que o devedor apresente. III &#8211; A justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta a acto processual depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o e da prova de um motivo razo\u00e1vel que permita aferir a impossibilidade ou o grave inconveniente no comparecimento da pessoa convocada. IV &#8211; Na fase inicial do processo de insolv\u00eancia, o princ\u00edpio do inquisit\u00f3rio s\u00f3 opera quando o juiz seja chamado a decidir quest\u00e3o controvertida entre as partes. V &#8211; Tal n\u00e3o sucede quando o devedor se tiver apresentado \u00e0 insolv\u00eancia, quando n\u00e3o deduzir oposi\u00e7\u00e3o ao pedido de insolv\u00eancia deduzido contra si ou quando n\u00e3o comparecer na audi\u00eancia de julgamento.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[110575],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,55295,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1001948","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-avr-b","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ARTUR DION\u00cdSIO OLIVEIRA. I - O adiamento da audi\u00eancia com fundamento em justo impedimento, ao abrigo do artigo 603.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CPC, depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o de factos suscept\u00edveis integrar os respectivos pressupostos - a ocorr\u00eancia de um evento imprevis\u00edvel, a impossibilidade de compar\u00eancia dele decorrente e a aus\u00eancia de culpa da parte e do mandat\u00e1rio - e da apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da respectiva prova ou da alega\u00e7\u00e3o da impossibilidade de fazer de imediato. II - A comina\u00e7\u00e3o prevista no artigo 35.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 2, do CIRE n\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel quando Tribunal julgue procedente a justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta que o devedor apresente. III - A justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta a acto processual depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o e da prova de um motivo razo\u00e1vel que permita aferir a impossibilidade ou o grave inconveniente no comparecimento da pessoa convocada. IV - Na fase inicial do processo de insolv\u00eancia, o princ\u00edpio do inquisit\u00f3rio s\u00f3 opera quando o juiz seja chamado a decidir quest\u00e3o controvertida entre as partes. V - Tal n\u00e3o sucede quando o devedor se tiver apresentado \u00e0 insolv\u00eancia, quando n\u00e3o deduzir oposi\u00e7\u00e3o ao pedido de insolv\u00eancia deduzido contra si ou quando n\u00e3o comparecer na audi\u00eancia de julgamento.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\\\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T10:22:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\\\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13","og_description":"Relator: ARTUR DION\u00cdSIO OLIVEIRA. I - O adiamento da audi\u00eancia com fundamento em justo impedimento, ao abrigo do artigo 603.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CPC, depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o de factos suscept\u00edveis integrar os respectivos pressupostos - a ocorr\u00eancia de um evento imprevis\u00edvel, a impossibilidade de compar\u00eancia dele decorrente e a aus\u00eancia de culpa da parte e do mandat\u00e1rio - e da apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da respectiva prova ou da alega\u00e7\u00e3o da impossibilidade de fazer de imediato. II - A comina\u00e7\u00e3o prevista no artigo 35.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 2, do CIRE n\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel quando Tribunal julgue procedente a justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta que o devedor apresente. III - A justifica\u00e7\u00e3o da falta a acto processual depende da alega\u00e7\u00e3o e da prova de um motivo razo\u00e1vel que permita aferir a impossibilidade ou o grave inconveniente no comparecimento da pessoa convocada. IV - Na fase inicial do processo de insolv\u00eancia, o princ\u00edpio do inquisit\u00f3rio s\u00f3 opera quando o juiz seja chamado a decidir quest\u00e3o controvertida entre as partes. V - Tal n\u00e3o sucede quando o devedor se tiver apresentado \u00e0 insolv\u00eancia, quando n\u00e3o deduzir oposi\u00e7\u00e3o ao pedido de insolv\u00eancia deduzido contra si ou quando n\u00e3o comparecer na audi\u00eancia de julgamento.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T10:22:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-2103-25-0t8avr-b-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 2103\/25.0T8AVR-B.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1001948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1001948"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1001948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}