{"id":1002102,"date":"2026-05-28T12:42:05","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:42:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T12:42:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T10:42:09","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I – A defesa por excep\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos dos artigos 571.\u00ba e 576.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, tem por objecto a pretens\u00e3o deduzida pelo autor, visando obstar \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do m\u00e9rito ou determinar a improced\u00eancia total ou parcial do pedido. II – As excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por um r\u00e9u na sua contesta\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o conferem, em regra, aos co-r\u00e9us o direito a apresentar articulado aut\u00f3nomo de resposta, ainda que estes possam ter interesse indirecto ou reflexo na improced\u00eancia dessa defesa. III – O contradit\u00f3rio previsto no artigo 3.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 4, do CPC reporta-se \u00e0 parte contr\u00e1ria relativamente \u00e0 excep\u00e7\u00e3o deduzida, normalmente o autor, n\u00e3o instituindo um regime geral de articulados cruzados entre co-r\u00e9us. IV – A adequa\u00e7\u00e3o formal, prevista no artigo 547.\u00ba do CPC, permite ao juiz adaptar a tramita\u00e7\u00e3o processual \u00e0s especificidades da causa, mas n\u00e3o legitima a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de articulados n\u00e3o previstos na lei. V – A jun\u00e7\u00e3o de documentos por um co-r\u00e9u pode justificar o exerc\u00edcio do contradit\u00f3rio probat\u00f3rio por outro sujeito processual se tais documentos forem suscept\u00edveis de ser valorados contra este, mas tal contradit\u00f3rio n\u00e3o se confunde com o direito a responder \u00e0s excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por co-r\u00e9u.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I – A defesa por excep\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos dos artigos 571.\u00ba e 576.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, tem por objecto a pretens\u00e3o deduzida pelo autor, visando obstar \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do m\u00e9rito ou determinar a improced\u00eancia total ou parcial do pedido. II – As excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por um r\u00e9u na sua contesta\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o conferem, em regra, aos co-r\u00e9us o direito a apresentar articulado aut\u00f3nomo de resposta, ainda que estes possam ter interesse indirecto ou reflexo na improced\u00eancia dessa defesa. III – O contradit\u00f3rio previsto no artigo 3.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 4, do CPC reporta-se \u00e0 parte contr\u00e1ria relativamente \u00e0 excep\u00e7\u00e3o deduzida, normalmente o autor, n\u00e3o instituindo um regime geral de articulados cruzados entre co-r\u00e9us. IV – A adequa\u00e7\u00e3o formal, prevista no artigo 547.\u00ba do CPC, permite ao juiz adaptar a tramita\u00e7\u00e3o processual \u00e0s especificidades da causa, mas n\u00e3o legitima a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de articulados n\u00e3o previstos na lei. V – A jun\u00e7\u00e3o de documentos por um co-r\u00e9u pode justificar o exerc\u00edcio do contradit\u00f3rio probat\u00f3rio por outro sujeito processual se tais documentos forem suscept\u00edveis de ser valorados contra este, mas tal contradit\u00f3rio n\u00e3o se confunde com o direito a responder \u00e0s excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por co-r\u00e9u.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[110575],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,10791,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1002102","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-prt-a","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I - A defesa por excep\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos dos artigos 571.\u00ba e 576.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, tem por objecto a pretens\u00e3o deduzida pelo autor, visando obstar \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do m\u00e9rito ou determinar a improced\u00eancia total ou parcial do pedido. II - As excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por um r\u00e9u na sua contesta\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o conferem, em regra, aos co-r\u00e9us o direito a apresentar articulado aut\u00f3nomo de resposta, ainda que estes possam ter interesse indirecto ou reflexo na improced\u00eancia dessa defesa. III - O contradit\u00f3rio previsto no artigo 3.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 4, do CPC reporta-se \u00e0 parte contr\u00e1ria relativamente \u00e0 excep\u00e7\u00e3o deduzida, normalmente o autor, n\u00e3o instituindo um regime geral de articulados cruzados entre co-r\u00e9us. IV - A adequa\u00e7\u00e3o formal, prevista no artigo 547.\u00ba do CPC, permite ao juiz adaptar a tramita\u00e7\u00e3o processual \u00e0s especificidades da causa, mas n\u00e3o legitima a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de articulados n\u00e3o previstos na lei. V - A jun\u00e7\u00e3o de documentos por um co-r\u00e9u pode justificar o exerc\u00edcio do contradit\u00f3rio probat\u00f3rio por outro sujeito processual se tais documentos forem suscept\u00edveis de ser valorados contra este, mas tal contradit\u00f3rio n\u00e3o se confunde com o direito a responder \u00e0s excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por co-r\u00e9u.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T10:42:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\\\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T10:42:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-28T10:42:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\\\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13","og_description":"Relator: RAQUEL CORREIA DE LIMA. I - A defesa por excep\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos dos artigos 571.\u00ba e 576.\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil, tem por objecto a pretens\u00e3o deduzida pelo autor, visando obstar \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do m\u00e9rito ou determinar a improced\u00eancia total ou parcial do pedido. II - As excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por um r\u00e9u na sua contesta\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o conferem, em regra, aos co-r\u00e9us o direito a apresentar articulado aut\u00f3nomo de resposta, ainda que estes possam ter interesse indirecto ou reflexo na improced\u00eancia dessa defesa. III - O contradit\u00f3rio previsto no artigo 3.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 4, do CPC reporta-se \u00e0 parte contr\u00e1ria relativamente \u00e0 excep\u00e7\u00e3o deduzida, normalmente o autor, n\u00e3o instituindo um regime geral de articulados cruzados entre co-r\u00e9us. IV - A adequa\u00e7\u00e3o formal, prevista no artigo 547.\u00ba do CPC, permite ao juiz adaptar a tramita\u00e7\u00e3o processual \u00e0s especificidades da causa, mas n\u00e3o legitima a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de articulados n\u00e3o previstos na lei. V - A jun\u00e7\u00e3o de documentos por um co-r\u00e9u pode justificar o exerc\u00edcio do contradit\u00f3rio probat\u00f3rio por outro sujeito processual se tais documentos forem suscept\u00edveis de ser valorados contra este, mas tal contradit\u00f3rio n\u00e3o se confunde com o direito a responder \u00e0s excep\u00e7\u00f5es deduzidas por co-r\u00e9u.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-28T10:42:09+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T10:42:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-28T10:42:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-do-porto-processo-18454-25-0t8prt-a-p1-2026-05-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o do Porto \u2013 Processo 18454\/25.0T8PRT-A.P1 \u2013 2026-05-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1002102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1002102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1002102"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1002102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}