{"id":1005559,"date":"2026-05-29T00:44:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T22:44:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/"},"modified":"2026-05-29T00:44:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T22:44:16","slug":"justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>No.743\/26 du18mai 2026 Audience publique dulundi,dix-huitmaideux mille vingt-six Le Tribunal de Paix de Diekirch, arrondissement judiciaire de Diekirch et Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8rede bail \u00e0 loyer, a rendu le jugement qui suit dans la cause entre: l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG ,repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par son Ministre de la Famille, des Solidarit\u00e9s, du Vivre ensemble et de l\u2019Accueil, sinon par son Ministre d\u2019Etat en fonctions, poursuites et diligences de l\u2019Office national de l\u2019accueil, \u00e9tabli \u00e0 L-1734 Luxembourg, 5, rue Carlo Hemmer, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par son directeur actuellement en fonctions (ONA), partie demanderesse, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9epar Ma\u00eetre G\u00e9rard ROLLINGER, avocat, en remplacement de Ma\u00eetre Marc THEWES, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, les deux demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, et PERSONNE1.),n\u00e9 leDATE1.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE1.), partied\u00e9fenderesse, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9epar Ma\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg. FAITS: Suivant une requ\u00eate d\u00e9pos\u00e9e en date du19 f\u00e9vrier 2026au greffe de la Justice de Paix de Diekirch, les parties furent convoqu\u00e9es \u00e0 compara\u00eetre devant le tribunal de paix de Diekirch, \u00e0 l&#039;audience publiquedulundi,13 avril 2026\u00e014.30 heures, \u00e0 la Justice de paix de Diekirch,\u00abBei der Aler Kiirch\u00bb, pour y entendre statuer sur le m\u00e9rite des causes \u00e9nonc\u00e9es dans ladite requ\u00eate. L\u2019affaire fut utilement retenuel\u2019audiencepublique du lundi, 11 mai 2026.<\/p>\n<p>2 Lerepr\u00e9sentantdelapartie demanderesse,Ma\u00eetreG\u00e9rard ROLLINGER,exposa le sujet de l\u2019affaire etd\u00e9veloppa ses moyens. Le repr\u00e9sentant de lapartie d\u00e9fenderesse, Ma\u00eetreYusuf MEYNIOGLU, fut entendu en ses explications et moyens de d\u00e9fense. Sur ce le tribunal de paix de Diekirch prit l\u2019affaire en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 et fixa le prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience publique dece jour \u00e0 laquellele tribunal rendit l e j u g e m e n t q u i s u i t : Par requ\u00eate d\u00e9pos\u00e9e au greffe de la Justice de Paix de et \u00e0 Diekirch le19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND-DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG a r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement fait convoquerPERSONNE1.)devant ce tribunal pour s\u2019entendre condamner \u00e0 lui payer la somme de3.000.-eurosavec les int\u00e9r\u00eats l\u00e9gaux \u00e0 partir des \u00e9ch\u00e9ances respectives\u00e0 titre d\u2019arri\u00e9r\u00e9sd\u2019indemnit\u00e9sd\u2019occupationmensuelles.Il requiert encore une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 250.-euros et l\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire du jugement \u00e0 intervenir. PERSONNE1.)n\u2019a pas contest\u00e9 la demande principale mais s\u2019est oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019octroi d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure. Il r\u00e9sulte des pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es en cause que parengagement unilat\u00e9ral du8 avril 2022,PERSONNE1.)s\u2019est engag\u00e9 \u00e0 payer la somme de510.-euros \u00e0 titre d\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019occupationmensuelle\u00e0 partir du 1 er juillet 2022. Il est constant en cause quePERSONNE1.)a quitt\u00e9 la structure d\u2019h\u00e9bergement\u00e0 ADRESSE2.)le9 avril 2024. Au vu des pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es en cause et des renseignements pris \u00e0 l\u2019audience publique, il y a lieu de d\u00e9clarer fond\u00e9e la demande del\u2019ETAT DU GRAND- DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG en paiement du montant de3.000.-euros\u00e0 titre d\u2019arri\u00e9r\u00e9sd\u2019indemnit\u00e9sd\u2019occupation. La partie requ\u00e9ranten\u2019ayant pas \u00e9tabli en quoi il serait in\u00e9quitable de laisser les frais non compris dans les d\u00e9pens \u00e0sacharge,sademandeen allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dureest\u00e0 rejeter. L\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG conclut \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire du jugement \u00e0 intervenir. Aux termes de l\u2019article 115 dunouveaucode deproc\u00e9dure civile, \u00abl\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire, sans caution, sera ordonn\u00e9e m\u00eame d\u2019office en justice de paix, s\u2019il y a titre authentique, promesse reconnue ou condamnation pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente par jugement<\/p>\n<p>3 dont il n\u2019y ait point appel. Dans tous les autres cas, l\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire pourra \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e avec ou sans caution.\u00bb La somme r\u00e9clam\u00e9e par la partie requ\u00e9rante n\u2019\u00e9tant pas contest\u00e9e par le d\u00e9fendeur, il y a lieu d\u2019ordonner l\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire du pr\u00e9sent jugement. PAR CES MOTIFS le tribunal de paix de Diekirch, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re de bail \u00e0 loyer, statuant contradictoirementeten premier ressort, re\u00e7oitla demande en la forme; lad\u00e9clarefond\u00e9e; partant, condamnePERSONNE1.)\u00e0 payer \u00e0l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG le montant de3.000.-eurosavec les int\u00e9r\u00eatsl\u00e9gaux \u00e0 partirdes \u00e9ch\u00e9ances respectivesjusqu\u2019\u00e0 solde; d\u00e9clarelademandeen allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure non fond\u00e9e et en d\u00e9boute; ordonnel\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire du pr\u00e9sent jugement nonobstant toute voie de recours et sans caution; condamnePERSONNE1.)aux frais et d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance. Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par NousLex EIPPERS, juge de paixdirecteur adjoint \u00e0 Diekirch, assist\u00e9 du greffierGilles GARSON, en notre audience publique en la salle des audiences de la Justice de Paix de Diekirch, \u00abBei derAler Kiirch\u00bb,date qu\u2019en t\u00eate et avons sign\u00e9 avec le greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/justice-de-paix-diekirch\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/justice-de-paix-diekirch\/20260524-232317\/20260518-jpdbail-743-pseudonymise-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No.743\/26 du18mai 2026 Audience publique dulundi,dix-huitmaideux mille vingt-six Le Tribunal de Paix de Diekirch, arrondissement judiciaire de Diekirch et Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8rede bail \u00e0 loyer, a rendu le jugement qui suit dans la cause entre: l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[112080],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[24761,9055],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1005559","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-justice-de-paix-diekirch","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-diekirch","kji_keyword-justice","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"No.743\/26 du18mai 2026 Audience publique dulundi,dix-huitmaideux mille vingt-six Le Tribunal de Paix de Diekirch, arrondissement judiciaire de Diekirch et Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8rede bail \u00e0 loyer, a rendu le jugement qui suit dans la cause entre: l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T22:44:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\\\/\",\"name\":\"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-28T22:44:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-28T22:44:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026","og_description":"No.743\/26 du18mai 2026 Audience publique dulundi,dix-huitmaideux mille vingt-six Le Tribunal de Paix de Diekirch, arrondissement judiciaire de Diekirch et Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8rede bail \u00e0 loyer, a rendu le jugement qui suit dans la cause entre: l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND -DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-28T22:44:16+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/","name":"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-28T22:44:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-28T22:44:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-diekirch-18-mai-2026-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Justice de Paix Diekirch, 18 mai 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1005559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1005559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1005559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1005559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}