{"id":1026131,"date":"2026-05-31T14:07:45","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T12:07:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-31T14:07:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-31T12:07:49","slug":"justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Justice de Paix Luxembourg – IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

1 R\u00e9pertoire n\u00b01863\/2026 RPL816\/25 JUSTICE DE PAIX DE LUXEMBOURG Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire-Plateau du St. Esprit-B\u00e2timent JP _____________________________________________________________ DECISION du12maideux mille vingt-six rendueen application du r\u00e8glement (CE)n\u00b0 861\/2007 dans la cause entre: la soci\u00e9t\u00e9anonymeSOCIETE1.)S.A., \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L- ADRESSE1.), partie demanderesse, et SOCIETE2.),demeurant\u00e0B-ADRESSE2.),<\/p>\n

2 partied\u00e9fenderesse. _____________________________________________________________________ Les indications de proc\u00e9dure Par formulaire de demande entr\u00e9 \u00e0 la Justice de paix de et \u00e0 Luxembourg en date du23 septembre2025, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A.a introduit une proc\u00e9dure sur base du r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0 861\/2007 du Parlement europ\u00e9en et du Conseil du 11 juillet 2007 instituant une proc\u00e9dure europ\u00e9enne de r\u00e8glement des petits litiges. La partie demanderesse sollicite la condamnation deSOCIETE2.)au paiement de la somme de3.279,80euros avec les int\u00e9r\u00eatscontractuels de 12%\u00e0 partir du5 septembre 2025. La partiedemanderesse demande encore des frais de proc\u00e9dure \u00e0 hauteur de 84,24 euros. Le formulaire A, ensemble les pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019appui de la demande et le formulaire de r\u00e9ponse (formulaire C)ont \u00e9t\u00e9envoy\u00e9sle17 d\u00e9cembre2025par courrier recommand\u00e9 avec accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception \u00e0 la partie d\u00e9fenderesse. L\u2019envoi postal a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 le19 d\u00e9cembre2025 \u00e0 lapartie d\u00e9fenderesse. Bien que d\u00fbment inform\u00e9e, la partied\u00e9fenderessen\u2019a pas pris position par rapport aux documents lui envoy\u00e9s dans le d\u00e9lai de 30jours, tel que pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 5 du r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0 861\/2007 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la demande La demande relevant du champ d\u2019application du r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0861\/2007 et r\u00e9pondant aux formes pr\u00e9vues par ledit r\u00e8glement est recevable. La partie d\u00e9fenderesse, demeurant enBelgique, n\u2019ayant pas comparu, il y a lieu, en application de l\u2019article 28 du r\u00e8glement (UE) n\u00b01215\/2012 du Parlement europ\u00e9en et du Conseil du 12 d\u00e9cembre 2012 concernant la comp\u00e9tence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l\u2019ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions en mati\u00e8re civile et commerciale, d\u2019examiner d\u2019office la comp\u00e9tence territoriale du tribunal saisi. La partie demanderesse estime en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce que le tribunal saisi est comp\u00e9tent pour \u00eatre celui choisi par les parties dans les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de vente. L\u2019article 16.2 des conditions de venteest libell\u00e9 comme suit: \u00abtoute contestation relative \u00e0 l\u2019existence, l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation, ou l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du Contrat et de ses suites, sera de la comp\u00e9tence des tribunaux de Luxembourg ville, sans pr\u00e9judice du droit d\u2019SOCIETE1.)de porter les litiges devant tout autre tribunal comp\u00e9tent. En cas de litige, le Souscripteur s\u2019adressera en priorit\u00e9 \u00e0SOCIETE1.)pour trouver une solution amiable\u00bb.<\/p>\n

3 Il r\u00e9sulte desbonsde commande sign\u00e9spar la partie d\u00e9fenderesse qu\u2019elle a accept\u00e9 les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de vente qui, dans l\u2019article pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, accordent comp\u00e9tence aux tribunaux de Luxembourg-Ville. Le Tribunal saisi est d\u00e8s lors comp\u00e9tent. \u00c0 l\u2019appui de sa demande en paiement, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A. verse en cause les facturesNUMERO1.)du 13 f\u00e9vrier 2025, d\u2019un montant de 1.800.-EUR, ainsi que les facturesNUMERO2.), d\u2019un montant de 2.800.-EUR, etNUMERO3.), d\u2019un montant de 1.428.-EUR, toutes deux dat\u00e9es du 23 f\u00e9vrier 2024. Ces factures \u00e9taient payables par tranches mensuelles et, d\u00e9duction faite des paiements intervenus entre-temps, leur solde s\u2019\u00e9l\u00e8verait actuellement \u00e0 3.279,80.-EUR. Concernant les int\u00e9r\u00eats de retard, les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de ventestipulent qu\u2019\u00e0 d\u00e9faut de paiement \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9ch\u00e9ance, s\u2019appliquent de plein droit des int\u00e9r\u00eats de retard de 12%; ces p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s de retard \u00e9tant automatiquement et de plein droit acquis sans formalit\u00e9s ni mise en demeure (article 11.8). La soci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A.ne r\u00e9clame les int\u00e9r\u00eats qu\u2019\u00e0 partir d\u2019une date post\u00e9rieure \u00e0 cettefacture, \u00e0 savoir \u00e0 partir de la date de la demande en justice. Les int\u00e9r\u00eats sont d\u00e8s lors \u00e0 allouer \u00e0 partir du23 septembre2025. Au vu des d\u00e9veloppements qui pr\u00e9c\u00e8dent,et en tenant compte des paiements effectu\u00e9s par la partie d\u00e9fenderesse,il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 la demande et de condamner SOCIETE2.)\u00e0 payer \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A. la somme de3.279,80euros,cette somme \u00e0 augmenter des int\u00e9r\u00eats contractuels de 12% \u00e0 partir de la demande en justice, soit le23 septembre2025. Concernant la demande en allocation de frais de proc\u00e9dure, il convient de se rapporter \u00e0 l\u2019article 240 du Nouveau Code de proc\u00e9dure civile qui dispose que lorsqu\u2019il appara\u00eet in\u00e9quitable de laisser \u00e0 la charge d\u2019une partie les sommes expos\u00e9es par elle et non comprises dans les d\u00e9pens, le juge peut condamner l\u2019autre partie \u00e0 lui payer le montant qu\u2019il d\u00e9termine. L\u2019application de l\u2019article 240 du Nouveau Code deproc\u00e9dure civile rel\u00e8ve du pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge(Cass. lux. n\u00b0 60\/15 du 2 juillet 2015, n\u00b0 3508 du registre). Au vu des \u00e9l\u00e9ments du dossier, la demande est justifi\u00e9e jusqu\u2019\u00e0 concurrence de 25euros. En application de l\u2019article 15 du r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0 861\/2007, la d\u00e9cision rendue par la juridiction est ex\u00e9cutoire nonobstant tout recours \u00e9ventuel.<\/p>\n

4 Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 16 du r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0861\/2007, la partie qui succombe doit supporter les frais de la proc\u00e9dure. Par ces motifs : le Tribunal de paix de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e8glement des petits litiges, statuant enpremierressort, re\u00e7oitla demande en la forme, ditfond\u00e9e la demande de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A.en paiement du montant de 3.279,80euros, condamneSOCIETE2.)\u00e0 payer \u00e0lasoci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A.la somme de3.279,80 euros,avec les int\u00e9r\u00eatsconventionnels de 12%\u00e0 partir de la demande en justice, soit le 23 septembre2025,jusqu\u2019\u00e0 solde, condamneSOCIETE2.)\u00e0 payer \u00e0lasoci\u00e9t\u00e9SOCIETE1.)S.A.une indemnit\u00e9 de 25 euros sur base de l\u2019article 240 du Nouveau Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, ordonnel\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire de la pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision nonobstant toute voie de recours et sanscaution, condamneSOCIETE2.)aux frais et d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance. Ainsi fait et jug\u00e9 par NousFr\u00e9d\u00e9ric GRUHLKE, juge de paix \u00e0 Luxembourg, assist\u00e9 de la greffi\u00e8re Natascha CASULLI, qui ont sign\u00e9 la pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision date qu\u2019en t\u00eate. Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ricGRUHLKE, juge de paix Natascha CASULLI, greffi\u00e8re<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1 R\u00e9pertoire n\u00b01863\/2026 RPL816\/25 JUSTICE DE PAIX DE LUXEMBOURG Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire-Plateau du St. Esprit-B\u00e2timent JP _____________________________________________________________ DECISION du12maideux mille vingt-six rendueen application du r\u00e8glement (CE)n\u00b0 861\/2007 dans la cause entre: la soci\u00e9t\u00e9anonymeSOCIETE1.)S.A., \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L- ADRESSE1.), partie demanderesse, et SOCIETE2.),demeurant\u00e0B-ADRESSE2.),\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[116646],"kji_chamber":[116647],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[116648,9055,26720],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1026131","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl","kji_chamber-ipa-rpl","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-ipa-rpl","kji_keyword-justice","kji_keyword-luxembourg","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nJustice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Justice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"1 R\u00e9pertoire n\u00b01863\/2026 RPL816\/25 JUSTICE DE PAIX DE LUXEMBOURG Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire-Plateau du St. Esprit-B\u00e2timent JP _____________________________________________________________ DECISION du12maideux mille vingt-six rendueen application du r\u00e8glement (CE)n\u00b0 861\/2007 dans la cause entre: la soci\u00e9t\u00e9anonymeSOCIETE1.)S.A., \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L- ADRESSE1.), partie demanderesse, et SOCIETE2.),demeurant\u00e0B-ADRESSE2.),\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-31T12:07:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Justice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-31T12:07:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-31T12:07:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Justice de Paix Luxembourg – IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Justice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Justice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026","og_description":"1 R\u00e9pertoire n\u00b01863\/2026 RPL816\/25 JUSTICE DE PAIX DE LUXEMBOURG Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire-Plateau du St. Esprit-B\u00e2timent JP _____________________________________________________________ DECISION du12maideux mille vingt-six rendueen application du r\u00e8glement (CE)n\u00b0 861\/2007 dans la cause entre: la soci\u00e9t\u00e9anonymeSOCIETE1.)S.A., \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L- ADRESSE1.), partie demanderesse, et SOCIETE2.),demeurant\u00e0B-ADRESSE2.),\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-31T12:07:49+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/","name":"Justice de Paix Luxembourg - IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-31T12:07:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-31T12:07:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/justice-de-paix-luxembourg-ipa-rpl-12-mai-2026-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Justice de Paix Luxembourg – IPA-RPL, 12 mai 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1026131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1026131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1026131"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1026131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}