{"id":1060417,"date":"2026-06-07T23:10:33","date_gmt":"2026-06-07T21:10:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/"},"modified":"2026-06-07T23:10:37","modified_gmt":"2026-06-07T21:10:37","slug":"supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 – Pce v Panchoo"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

P a g e | 1<\/p>\n

Pce v Panchoo<\/p>\n

2020 PL2 20<\/p>\n

POLICE v PANCHOO Pravesh Sona CN: 3359\/19<\/p>\n

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (2nd Division)<\/p>\n

In the matter of:<\/p>\n

POLICE V PANCHOO Pravesh Sona JUDGMENT Accused stands charged with the offences of Threatening verbally, in breach of sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code and Assault in breach of Sections 228 & 230(1) of the Criminal Code. Accused pleaded not guilty to the charges and was not represented at trial stage.<\/p>\n

Prosecution called PS Sumputh, who read and produced defence statement of the accused, marked as Doc A. Prosecution then called witness no.3, Mrs Marie Priska Isabell Tismar, who related that on 06\/04\/16 at 10.30 a.m, whilst at home at Ste Croix, the accused threated to throw acid on her if she does not give him money. She related that she felt scared and that additionally, he assaulted her on the leg. The case was then closed for the Prosecution. The accused was informed of his Constitutional rights in creole and elected to make a statement from the dock.<\/p>\n

P a g e | 2<\/p>\n

The case was then closed for the Defence. The Court has given due consideration to the evidence on record. Sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code read as follows: \u201c224 – Demanding by written threat of violence Any person, who by any writing, whether anonymous or signed, threatens any individual with murder, poisoning or any other attempt against the person of such individual punishable to penal servitude, shall be punished by penal servitude, where the threat is accompanied by an order to deposit a sum of money in a certain place, or to fulfill any other condition.<\/p>\n

226 – Threatening verbally Where the threat, so accompanied by an order or condition, has been made verbally, the offender shall be punished by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the case of Mudhoo H V The State (2012 SCJ 411) , the Supreme Court enlightened us on what constitutes threat and its constitutive elements:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt follows from the above that: (1) in the case of a written threat, there would be an offence under section 224 where the written threat is accompanied by an \u2018order\u2019 or \u2018condition\u2019; (2) there would still be an offence under section 225 even where a written threat is not accompanied by any \u2018order\u2019 or \u2018condition\u2019; (3) but there would be no offence in the case of a verbal threat unless it is accompanied by an order or condition as described in section 224.<\/p>\n

In fact, \u2018menace\u2019 would only constitute an offence under section 226, in case of a verbal threat,where the threat is accompanied by such an \u2018order\u2019 or \u2018condition\u2019 as is specified in section 224 (\u2026)<\/p>\n

An offence would only lie in respect of a verbal threat under section 226 where the following constitutive elements have been established. These are explicitly set out in Gar\u00e7on, Code P\u00e9nal Livre III Art. 305 \u00e0 308, following an analysis of the corresponding provisions which create the offence of \u2018menace\u2019 in French law: \u201cE. Caract\u00e8re de la menace. \u2013 36. \u2026 \u2026 \u2026<\/p>\n

P a g e | 3<\/p>\n

C\u2019est au juge qu\u2019il appartient de d\u00e9terminer leur caract\u00e8re et de d\u00e9cider: 10 Si l\u2019\u00e9crit ou le propos incrimin\u00e9 est de nature mena\u00e7ante; 20 si cette menace a pour objet un attentat contre les personnes puni de peines perp\u00e9tuelles, ou des violences ou voies de fait; 30 enfin, si elle est sous ordre ou sous condition. \u201d<\/p>\n

We need first to observe that it is not any type of a verbal threat which would give rise to an offence under section 226. The threat must not only be \u201cde nature mena\u00e7ante\u201d but there would be an offence only where a person is threatened with \u2018murder, poisoning or any other attempt against the person\u2019 which is punishable by death or penal servitude. This element has been clearly established in the present case since the appellant threatened to kill the complainant.<\/p>\n

But that is not enough. It must also be established that the verbal threat is accompanied by an order or condition, as is explicitly set out in the following extract from Encyclop\u00e9die Dalloz \u2013 P\u00e9nal Vo Menaces: \u201c28. b) Ordre de remplir une condition. Le r\u00e9gime g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des menaces d\u2019atteintes graves aux personnes exige, pour que la menace soit punissable, qu\u2019elle ait \u00e9t\u00e9 faite \u00ab avec ordre de remplir une condition \u00bb \u2026 \u2026 \u2026 l\u2019auteur de la menace signifie \u00e0 la personne menac\u00e9e que l\u2019infraction sera ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e si la condition n\u2019est pas remplie. \u201d<\/p>\n

The condition that is impressed on the person who is threatened needs not, however, be linked to the carrying out of a positive obligation. It may also consist of an obligation to abstain or to refrain from doing something, like in the present case where the complainant was being intimidated and coerced into refraining from hitting back at the appellant\u2019s dog. \u201cLa condition peut aussi consister en une obligation de ne pas faire ou de s\u2019abstenir\u201d [Encyclop\u00e9die Dalloz (Supra) \u2013 at Note 29].<\/p>\n

This is also made explicit in Garraud Droit P\u00e9nal Sp\u00e9cial (Deuxi\u00e8me Edition) Tome Quatri\u00e8me V0 Menaces at para. 1686: \u201cD\u2019ailleurs la menace sous condition comprend, dans la g\u00e9n\u00e9ralit\u00e9 de ses termes, la menace sous condition de ne pas faire, de s\u2019abstenir, aussi bien que celle de faire. Il n\u2019existe, en effet, aucune raison de distinguer entre ces deux formes de menaces. \u201d (\u2026) However, although the threat must be accompanied by an order to comply with a condition, such a condition must not be merely of a hypothetical nature. The threat which consists of an order to comply<\/p>\n

P a g e | 4<\/p>\n

with a condition must not only be of an intimidating nature but must be of a nature which exercises a \u201ccontrainte morale\u201d on the conduct of the threatened person.<\/p>\n

This is clearly made out in the following excerpts from Encyclop\u00e9die Dalloz (Supra):<\/p>\n

\u201c28. \u2026 \u2026 \u2026 Le coupable porte atteinte \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 d\u2019agir de la victimeparcequ\u2019il l\u2019intimide et la contraint \u00e0 un certain comportement. 29. \u2026 \u2026 \u2026 Mais l\u2019ordre de remplir une condition doit \u00eatre une v\u00e9ritableinjonction contraignante et pas uniquement une injonction intimidante, l\u2019ordre ne devant pas \u00eatre abandonn\u00e9 \u00e0 une condition dont le caract\u00e8re par trop \u00e9ventuel lui enl\u00e8ve tout aspect contraignant.\u201d<\/p>\n

This is also expressed in Dalloz R\u00e9pertoire de Droit P\u00e9nal Tome VI Vo Menaces at Note 81: \u201c81. Condition hypoth\u00e9tique – Enfin, l\u2019ordre de remplir une condition doit \u00eatre une v\u00e9ritable injonction contraignante et pas uniquement une injonction intimidante;(underlining is my own) en cas de condition hypoth\u00e9tique, on doit consid\u00e9rer que la menace n\u2019existe pas.\u201d<\/p>\n

It has therefore to be determined on the facts whether the verbal threat made by the appellant was accompanied by an order to fulfill a condition of such a nature as is explicitly set out in Dalloz, R\u00e9pertoire de Droit P\u00e9nal (Supra) at Note 69:<\/p>\n

\u201c69. Pouvoir d\u2019interpr\u00e9tation judiciaire \u2013 Il appartient au juge de d\u00e9terminer \u2026\u2026 \u2026 s\u2019il y a ou non condition, celle-ci \u00e9tant une injonction faite \u00e0 autrui qui se trouve contraint de s\u2019y soumettre s\u2019il veut \u00e9viter d\u2019\u00eatre victime des faits qui lui sont promis dans la menace. Le coupable porte ainsi atteinte \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 d\u2019agir de la victime parce qu\u2019il l\u2019intimide et la contraint \u00e0 un certain comportement.\u201d \u00bb<\/p>\n

The complainant explained clearly how the accused threatened her and how she felt. She also explained how he assaulted her. The Court finds no reason not to give credit to her version, given she came across as credible. The accused tendered his apologies from the dock. The Court takes the view the Prosecution has proven its case beyond reasonable doubt under count I and count II. Court finds accused guilty as charged under count I and count II.<\/p>\n

P a g e | 5<\/p>\n

Mrs Manjula Kumari Boojharut (District Magistrate) Delivered on 11 February 2020<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Supreme Court of Mauritius – public domain<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

P a g e | 1 Pce v Panchoo 2020 PL2 20 POLICE v PANCHOO Pravesh Sona CN: 3359\/19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (2nd Division) In the matter of: POLICE V PANCHOO Pravesh Sona JUDGMENT Accused stands charged with the offences of Threatening verbally, in breach of sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code and Assault…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[92666],"kji_court":[92667],"kji_chamber":[127592],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8457,15757,95762,15594],"kji_language":[7611],"class_list":["post-1060417","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-maurice","kji_court-supreme-court-of-mauritius","kji_chamber-mrs-manjula-boojharut-acting-senior-district-magistrate","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-mauritius","kji_keyword-panchoo","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-anglais"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"P a g e | 1 Pce v Panchoo 2020 PL2 20 POLICE v PANCHOO Pravesh Sona CN: 3359\/19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (2nd Division) In the matter of: POLICE V PANCHOO Pravesh Sona JUDGMENT Accused stands charged with the offences of Threatening verbally, in breach of sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code and Assault...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-07T21:10:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-07T21:10:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-07T21:10:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 – Pce v Panchoo\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo","og_description":"P a g e | 1 Pce v Panchoo 2020 PL2 20 POLICE v PANCHOO Pravesh Sona CN: 3359\/19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (2nd Division) In the matter of: POLICE V PANCHOO Pravesh Sona JUDGMENT Accused stands charged with the offences of Threatening verbally, in breach of sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code and Assault...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-06-07T21:10:37+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/","name":"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 - Pce v Panchoo - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-07T21:10:33+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-07T21:10:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/supreme-court-of-mauritius-7-fevrier-2020-2020-pl2-20-pce-v-panchoo\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Supreme Court of Mauritius, 7 f\u00e9vrier 2020, 2020 PL2 20 – Pce v Panchoo"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1060417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1060417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1060417"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1060417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}