{"id":1068865,"date":"2026-06-10T12:06:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T10:06:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/"},"modified":"2026-06-10T12:06:31","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T10:06:31","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b042 DU 2 MAI 2019<\/p>\n<p>JULIETTE RIEUMAILHOL c\/ PAPE ALY OUSMANE DACOSTA ET JEAN BARA DACOSTA<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9GIMES MATRIMONIAUX \u2013 R\u00c9GIME DE LA COMMUNAUT \u00c9 DE BIENS \u2013 IMMEUBLE ACQUIS P ENDANT LE MARIAGE ET AVANT LE D\u00c9 C\u00c8S DE L\u2019\u00c9POUX \u2013 PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 EXCLUSIVE DE L\u2019\u00c9POUSE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT<\/p>\n<p>Selon l\u2019article 393 du code de la famille, \u00e0 la dissolution du r\u00e9gime r\u00e9sultant du d\u00e9c\u00e8s, seuls les immeubles advenus pendant le mariage par succession ou lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s sont exclus de la communaut\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>A fait une exacte application de la loi le tribunal qui, ayant relev\u00e9 que l\u2019 immeuble fait partie de la communaut\u00e9 ayant exist\u00e9 entre les \u00e9poux et constat\u00e9 qu\u2019il a \u00e9t\u00e9 acquis apr\u00e8s le mariage, mais ant\u00e9rieurement au d\u00e9c\u00e8s de l\u2019\u00e9poux, puis retenu qu\u2019 \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de prouver avoir acquis l\u2019immeuble par lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9 ou succession, l\u2019 \u00e9pouse est mal fond\u00e9e \u00e0 invoquer sa propri\u00e9t\u00e9 exclusive sur ledit immeuble.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que les d\u00e9fendeurs soul\u00e8vent \u00ab l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 \u00bb du pourvoi au motif que la signification de la requ\u00eate n\u2019est pas accompagn\u00e9e d\u2019 une exp\u00e9dition de la d\u00e9cision atta- qu\u00e9e, en violation des articles 33 et 37 de la loi organique susvis\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que la signification d\u2019une copie de la d\u00e9cision dont la sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 et la conformit\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019original ne sont pas contest\u00e9es, satisfait aux exigences de l\u2019article 37 de la loi organique susvis\u00e9e, surtout que les d\u00e9fendeurs ont produit un m\u00e9moire dans les d\u00e9lais l\u00e9gaux ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance n\u2019est pas encourue ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique tir\u00e9 de la violation de la loi :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu, selon le jugement attaqu\u00e9 (Dakar, 6 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1409), rendu en der- nier ressort, qu\u2019 Alcinou Louis D ACOSTA et M me RIEUMAILHOL ont contract\u00e9 mariage sous le r\u00e9gime de la communaut\u00e9 des biens le 21 f\u00e9vrier 1974 ; que par acte de vente \u00e9tabli devant notaire, M me RIEUMAILHOL a acquis pendant le mariage, un immeuble objet du titre foncier n\u00b0 22328\/DG, report\u00e9 au livre foncier de Grand Dakar, le 11 jan- vier 2001, sous le n\u00b0 5962\/GR ; qu\u2019apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9c\u00e8s d\u2019Alcinou Louis D ACOSTA intervenu le 30 ao\u00fbt 2011, Papa Ali et Jean Bara D ACOSTA, ses enfants, ont saisi le tribunal d\u2019une action aux fins de liquidation de la communaut\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 17-18<\/p>\n<p>56 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que M me RIEUMAILHOL fait grief au jugement d\u2019inclure l\u2019immeuble dans la communaut\u00e9 des biens ayant exist\u00e9 entre les \u00e9poux alors, selon le moyen, qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des articles 392 et 390 du code de la famille, que \u00ab chaque \u00e9poux peut acqu\u00e9rir seul et sans le consentement du conjoint toute esp\u00e8ce de biens et que chacun d\u2019eux g\u00e8re seul ses biens, sans distinction, selon leur nature, leur origine ou leurs conditions d\u2019acquisition \u00bb, ce qui conf\u00e8re \u00e0 chaque \u00e9poux qui acquiert seul un bien, sa totale admi- nistration, m\u00eame apr\u00e8s la dissolution du r\u00e9gime par d\u00e9c\u00e8s ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que, selon l\u2019 article 393 du code de la famille , \u00e0 la dissolution du r\u00e9gime r\u00e9sultant du d\u00e9c\u00e8s, seuls les immeubles advenus pendant le mariage par succession ou lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s sont exclus de la communaut\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Et attendu qu\u2019ayant relev\u00e9 que l\u2019immeuble objet du TF n\u00b0 5962\/GR a \u00e9t\u00e9 acquis apr\u00e8s le mariage, mais ant\u00e9rieurement au d\u00e9c\u00e8s de l\u2019\u00e9poux, puis retenu qu\u2019il n\u2019est pas prouv\u00e9 que l\u2019immeuble ait \u00e9t\u00e9 acquis par lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9 ou succession, conform\u00e9ment aux disposi- tions de l\u2019 article 393 du code de la famille , le tribunal en a justement d\u00e9duit que l\u2019immeuble faisait partie de la communaut\u00e9 et que M me RIEUMAILHOL \u00e9tait mal fond\u00e9e \u00e0 invoquer sa propri\u00e9t\u00e9 exclusive sur ledit immeuble ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen est mal fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n<p>Rejette le pourvoi form\u00e9 par Juliette R IEUMAILHOL contre le jugement n\u00b0 1409 du 6 novembre 2017 rendu en dernier ressort par le tribunal de grande instance de Dakar ;<\/p>\n<p>Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres du tribunal de grande instance de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT : EL HADJI MALICK SOW ; RAPPORTEUR : EL HADJI MALICK SOW ; CONSEILLERS : SOULEYMANE KANE, WALY FAYE, AMADOU LAMINE BATHILY, HABIBATOU BABOU WADE ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : MATAR NDIAYE ; GREFFIER : MA\u00ceTRE MAURICE DIOMA KAMA .<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2019<\/p>\n<p>Chambre civile et commerciale 57<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA17-18-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA17-18-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b042 DU 2 MAI 2019 JULIETTE RIEUMAILHOL c\/ PAPE ALY OUSMANE DACOSTA ET JEAN BARA DACOSTA R\u00c9GIMES MATRIMONIAUX \u2013 R\u00c9GIME DE LA COMMUNAUT \u00c9 DE BIENS \u2013 IMMEUBLE ACQUIS P ENDANT LE MARIAGE ET AVANT LE D\u00c9 C\u00c8S DE L\u2019\u00c9POUX \u2013 PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 EXCLUSIVE DE L\u2019\u00c9POUSE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT Selon l\u2019article 393 du code de la famille, \u00e0 la dissolution du&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[45029],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1068865","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-45029","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b042 DU 2 MAI 2019 JULIETTE RIEUMAILHOL c\/ PAPE ALY OUSMANE DACOSTA ET JEAN BARA DACOSTA R\u00c9GIMES MATRIMONIAUX \u2013 R\u00c9GIME DE LA COMMUNAUT \u00c9 DE BIENS \u2013 IMMEUBLE ACQUIS P ENDANT LE MARIAGE ET AVANT LE D\u00c9 C\u00c8S DE L\u2019\u00c9POUX \u2013 PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 EXCLUSIVE DE L\u2019\u00c9POUSE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT Selon l\u2019article 393 du code de la famille, \u00e0 la dissolution du...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T10:06:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T10:06:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T10:06:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b042 DU 2 MAI 2019 JULIETTE RIEUMAILHOL c\/ PAPE ALY OUSMANE DACOSTA ET JEAN BARA DACOSTA R\u00c9GIMES MATRIMONIAUX \u2013 R\u00c9GIME DE LA COMMUNAUT \u00c9 DE BIENS \u2013 IMMEUBLE ACQUIS P ENDANT LE MARIAGE ET AVANT LE D\u00c9 C\u00c8S DE L\u2019\u00c9POUX \u2013 PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 EXCLUSIVE DE L\u2019\u00c9POUSE \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT Selon l\u2019article 393 du code de la famille, \u00e0 la dissolution du...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-06-10T10:06:31+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-10T10:06:27+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T10:06:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-42-du-2-mai-2019\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 42 du 2 MAI 2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1068865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1068865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1068865"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1068865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}