{"id":1073914,"date":"2026-06-11T22:55:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T20:55:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/"},"modified":"2026-06-11T22:55:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T20:55:12","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O DA JUSTI\u00c7A. I – A aplica\u00e7\u00e3o pela Administra\u00e7\u00e3o – ainda que por decis\u00e3o contenciosamente recorrivel – da medida de inibi\u00e7\u00e3o da faculdade de conduzir, sem precedencia de uma audiencia de julgamento onde seja possivel estabelecer o contraditorio e o arguido ser ouvido e defender-se, conduz a um encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa que, segundo a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, o processo criminal deve assegurar. II – A faculdade que a lei confere ao arguido de requerer diligencias e juntar documentos na fase de recurso hierarquico da decis\u00e3o sobre a inibi\u00e7\u00e3o a faculdade de conduzir n\u00e3o e bastante para suprir a impossibilidade em que o Supremo Tribunal Administrativo se encontra de apreciar os aspectos discricionarios da quest\u00e3o. III – As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o sofreriam altera\u00e7\u00e3o mesmo que se assentasse que as contraven\u00e7\u00f5es estradais constituem materialmente contra-ordena\u00e7\u00f5es, pois que ainda assim o regime aplicavel, resultante do artigo 61, n. 4, do Codigo da Estrada, conduziria ao mesmo encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O DA JUSTI\u00c7A. I – A aplica\u00e7\u00e3o pela Administra\u00e7\u00e3o – ainda que por decis\u00e3o contenciosamente recorrivel – da medida de inibi\u00e7\u00e3o da faculdade de conduzir, sem precedencia de uma audiencia de julgamento onde seja possivel estabelecer o contraditorio e o arguido ser ouvido e defender-se, conduz a um encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa que, segundo a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, o processo criminal deve assegurar. II – A faculdade que a lei confere ao arguido de requerer diligencias e juntar documentos na fase de recurso hierarquico da decis\u00e3o sobre a inibi\u00e7\u00e3o a faculdade de conduzir n\u00e3o e bastante para suprir a impossibilidade em que o Supremo Tribunal Administrativo se encontra de apreciar os aspectos discricionarios da quest\u00e3o. III – As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o sofreriam altera\u00e7\u00e3o mesmo que se assentasse que as contraven\u00e7\u00f5es estradais constituem materialmente contra-ordena\u00e7\u00f5es, pois que ainda assim o regime aplicavel, resultante do artigo 61, n. 4, do Codigo da Estrada, conduziria ao mesmo encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135675],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[82317,130098,118901,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1073914","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-135675","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-administracao","kji_keyword-ainda","kji_keyword-faculdade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O DA JUSTI\u00c7A. I - A aplica\u00e7\u00e3o pela Administra\u00e7\u00e3o - ainda que por decis\u00e3o contenciosamente recorrivel - da medida de inibi\u00e7\u00e3o da faculdade de conduzir, sem precedencia de uma audiencia de julgamento onde seja possivel estabelecer o contraditorio e o arguido ser ouvido e defender-se, conduz a um encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa que, segundo a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, o processo criminal deve assegurar. II - A faculdade que a lei confere ao arguido de requerer diligencias e juntar documentos na fase de recurso hierarquico da decis\u00e3o sobre a inibi\u00e7\u00e3o a faculdade de conduzir n\u00e3o e bastante para suprir a impossibilidade em que o Supremo Tribunal Administrativo se encontra de apreciar os aspectos discricionarios da quest\u00e3o. III - As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o sofreriam altera\u00e7\u00e3o mesmo que se assentasse que as contraven\u00e7\u00f5es estradais constituem materialmente contra-ordena\u00e7\u00f5es, pois que ainda assim o regime aplicavel, resultante do artigo 61, n. 4, do Codigo da Estrada, conduziria ao mesmo encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T20:55:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18","og_description":"Relator: ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O DA JUSTI\u00c7A. I - A aplica\u00e7\u00e3o pela Administra\u00e7\u00e3o - ainda que por decis\u00e3o contenciosamente recorrivel - da medida de inibi\u00e7\u00e3o da faculdade de conduzir, sem precedencia de uma audiencia de julgamento onde seja possivel estabelecer o contraditorio e o arguido ser ouvido e defender-se, conduz a um encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa que, segundo a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, o processo criminal deve assegurar. II - A faculdade que a lei confere ao arguido de requerer diligencias e juntar documentos na fase de recurso hierarquico da decis\u00e3o sobre a inibi\u00e7\u00e3o a faculdade de conduzir n\u00e3o e bastante para suprir a impossibilidade em que o Supremo Tribunal Administrativo se encontra de apreciar os aspectos discricionarios da quest\u00e3o. III - As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o sofreriam altera\u00e7\u00e3o mesmo que se assentasse que as contraven\u00e7\u00f5es estradais constituem materialmente contra-ordena\u00e7\u00f5es, pois que ainda assim o regime aplicavel, resultante do artigo 61, n. 4, do Codigo da Estrada, conduziria ao mesmo encurtamento inadmissivel das garantias de defesa.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-11T20:55:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0043-1985-12-18\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0043 \u2013 1985-12-18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1073914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1073914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1073914"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1073914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}