{"id":1074601,"date":"2026-06-12T00:30:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T22:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T00:30:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T22:30:20","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I &#8211; Como todos os procedimentos da mesma natureza, o respeitante a providencia cautelar da suspens\u00e3o do despedimento n\u00e3o visa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o definitiva da quest\u00e3o juridica que lhe esta subjacente, mas apenas a sua solu\u00e7\u00e3o interina ou provisoria &#8211; ou, melhor dito, a regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de facto que havera de existir entre as partes ate que chegue a final a ac\u00e7\u00e3o destinada a dirimir aquela quest\u00e3o. II &#8211; Nos procedimentos cautelares n\u00e3o cabe sen\u00e3o uma decis\u00e3o &quot;provisoria&quot; relativamente a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas de que substantivamente dependa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da quest\u00e3o a decidir no processo principal e, portanto, a concess\u00e3o da providencia. III &#8211; De tal decis\u00e3o n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois que de outro modo se teria que admitir ou que tambem este Tribunal proferisse uma decis\u00e3o &quot;provisoria&quot; sobre a constitucionalidade, o que seria absurdo e incongruente com o sistema de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o de constitucionalidade delineado na Lei Fundamental; ou que decidisse definitivamente no proprio procedimento cautelar quest\u00e3o que haveria de ser resolvida na ac\u00e7\u00e3o de que tal procedimento depende, o que significaria a subvers\u00e3o da indole e finalidade do proprio procedimento. IV &#8211; Os recursos previstos no n. 1 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o so s\u00e3o de admitir de decis\u00f5es &quot;definitivas&quot; (&quot;definitivas&quot;, claro e, para o tribunal que as tiver proferido) respeitando, ainda que so implicitamente, a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas juridicas.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/atco1.nsf\/904714e45043f49b802565fa004a5fd7\/bac445c7282d3b4d8025682d0063f7b5?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I &#8211; Como todos os procedimentos da mesma natureza, o respeitante a providencia cautelar da suspens\u00e3o do despedimento n\u00e3o visa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o definitiva da quest\u00e3o juridica que lhe esta subjacente, mas apenas a sua solu\u00e7\u00e3o interina ou provisoria &#8211; ou, melhor dito, a regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de facto que havera de existir entre as partes ate que chegue a final a ac\u00e7\u00e3o destinada a dirimir aquela quest\u00e3o. II &#8211; Nos procedimentos cautelares n\u00e3o cabe sen\u00e3o uma decis\u00e3o &#8220;provisoria&#8221; relativamente a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas de que substantivamente dependa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da quest\u00e3o a decidir no processo principal e, portanto, a concess\u00e3o da providencia. III &#8211; De tal decis\u00e3o n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois que de outro modo se teria que admitir ou que tambem este Tribunal proferisse uma decis\u00e3o &#8220;provisoria&#8221; sobre a constitucionalidade, o que seria absurdo e incongruente com o sistema de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o de constitucionalidade delineado na Lei Fundamental; ou que decidisse definitivamente no proprio procedimento cautelar quest\u00e3o que haveria de ser resolvida na ac\u00e7\u00e3o de que tal procedimento depende, o que significaria a subvers\u00e3o da indole e finalidade do proprio procedimento. IV &#8211; Os recursos previstos no n. 1 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o so s\u00e3o de admitir de decis\u00f5es &#8220;definitivas&#8221; (&#8220;definitivas&#8221;, claro e, para o tribunal que as tiver proferido) respeitando, ainda que so implicitamente, a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas juridicas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135675],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,9356,7771,89731,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1074601","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-135675","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-constitucionalidade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-questao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Como todos os procedimentos da mesma natureza, o respeitante a providencia cautelar da suspens\u00e3o do despedimento n\u00e3o visa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o definitiva da quest\u00e3o juridica que lhe esta subjacente, mas apenas a sua solu\u00e7\u00e3o interina ou provisoria - ou, melhor dito, a regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de facto que havera de existir entre as partes ate que chegue a final a ac\u00e7\u00e3o destinada a dirimir aquela quest\u00e3o. II - Nos procedimentos cautelares n\u00e3o cabe sen\u00e3o uma decis\u00e3o &quot;provisoria&quot; relativamente a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas de que substantivamente dependa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da quest\u00e3o a decidir no processo principal e, portanto, a concess\u00e3o da providencia. III - De tal decis\u00e3o n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois que de outro modo se teria que admitir ou que tambem este Tribunal proferisse uma decis\u00e3o &quot;provisoria&quot; sobre a constitucionalidade, o que seria absurdo e incongruente com o sistema de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o de constitucionalidade delineado na Lei Fundamental; ou que decidisse definitivamente no proprio procedimento cautelar quest\u00e3o que haveria de ser resolvida na ac\u00e7\u00e3o de que tal procedimento depende, o que significaria a subvers\u00e3o da indole e finalidade do proprio procedimento. IV - Os recursos previstos no n. 1 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o so s\u00e3o de admitir de decis\u00f5es &quot;definitivas&quot; (&quot;definitivas&quot;, claro e, para o tribunal que as tiver proferido) respeitando, ainda que so implicitamente, a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas juridicas.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T22:30:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Como todos os procedimentos da mesma natureza, o respeitante a providencia cautelar da suspens\u00e3o do despedimento n\u00e3o visa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o definitiva da quest\u00e3o juridica que lhe esta subjacente, mas apenas a sua solu\u00e7\u00e3o interina ou provisoria - ou, melhor dito, a regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de facto que havera de existir entre as partes ate que chegue a final a ac\u00e7\u00e3o destinada a dirimir aquela quest\u00e3o. II - Nos procedimentos cautelares n\u00e3o cabe sen\u00e3o uma decis\u00e3o \"provisoria\" relativamente a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas de que substantivamente dependa a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da quest\u00e3o a decidir no processo principal e, portanto, a concess\u00e3o da providencia. III - De tal decis\u00e3o n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois que de outro modo se teria que admitir ou que tambem este Tribunal proferisse uma decis\u00e3o \"provisoria\" sobre a constitucionalidade, o que seria absurdo e incongruente com o sistema de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o de constitucionalidade delineado na Lei Fundamental; ou que decidisse definitivamente no proprio procedimento cautelar quest\u00e3o que haveria de ser resolvida na ac\u00e7\u00e3o de que tal procedimento depende, o que significaria a subvers\u00e3o da indole e finalidade do proprio procedimento. IV - Os recursos previstos no n. 1 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o so s\u00e3o de admitir de decis\u00f5es \"definitivas\" (\"definitivas\", claro e, para o tribunal que as tiver proferido) respeitando, ainda que so implicitamente, a quest\u00e3o da constitucionalidade de normas juridicas.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-11T22:30:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0035-1985-07-31\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0035 \u2013 1985-07-31"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1074601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1074601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1074601"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1074601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}