{"id":1075267,"date":"2026-06-12T02:17:51","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T00:17:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T02:17:51","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T00:17:51","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FUN\u00c7\u00c3O JURISDICIONAL. I – A Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o reserva a fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional aos tribunais, competindo a estes, e so a estes, a administra\u00e7\u00e3o da justi\u00e7a. II – A atribui\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional de determinada competencia a certo org\u00e3o de soberania exclui a possibilidade de ela poder vir a ser legalmente atribuida a qualquer outro, salvo implicita ou explicita autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional. III – Os capit\u00e3es de porto n\u00e3o s\u00e3o tribunais, nem com eles podem ser confundidos, porque se integram na Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Publica e n\u00e3o se podem desdobrar em dois ou mais org\u00e3os para efeito do exercicio desta ou daquela fun\u00e7\u00e3o estruturalmente diversa, e porque lhes falece a independencia pessoal, que se exige e garante aos juizes, e que tem como pressuposto minimo a respectiva inamovibilidade. IV – O acto praticado pelo capit\u00e3o de porto que dirime um conflito de interesses, resolve um litigio, julga uma lide, e o exercicio de tal competencia n\u00e3o se integra na fun\u00e7\u00e3o administrativa, mas na jurisdicional. V – As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o s\u00e3o alteradas pela circunstancia de, na pendencia do processo, a lei de revis\u00e3o constitucional ter vindo permitir a existencia de tribunais maritimos. Em primeiro lugar, as normas questionadas, porque contrarias a vers\u00e3o originaria da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e mesmo que se entendesse terem sido repristinadas com a revis\u00e3o constitucional, n\u00e3o podem ser consideradas tribunais por n\u00e3o gozarem de garantias de independencia.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FUN\u00c7\u00c3O JURISDICIONAL. I – A Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o reserva a fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional aos tribunais, competindo a estes, e so a estes, a administra\u00e7\u00e3o da justi\u00e7a. II – A atribui\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional de determinada competencia a certo org\u00e3o de soberania exclui a possibilidade de ela poder vir a ser legalmente atribuida a qualquer outro, salvo implicita ou explicita autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional. III – Os capit\u00e3es de porto n\u00e3o s\u00e3o tribunais, nem com eles podem ser confundidos, porque se integram na Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Publica e n\u00e3o se podem desdobrar em dois ou mais org\u00e3os para efeito do exercicio desta ou daquela fun\u00e7\u00e3o estruturalmente diversa, e porque lhes falece a independencia pessoal, que se exige e garante aos juizes, e que tem como pressuposto minimo a respectiva inamovibilidade. IV – O acto praticado pelo capit\u00e3o de porto que dirime um conflito de interesses, resolve um litigio, julga uma lide, e o exercicio de tal competencia n\u00e3o se integra na fun\u00e7\u00e3o administrativa, mas na jurisdicional. V – As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o s\u00e3o alteradas pela circunstancia de, na pendencia do processo, a lei de revis\u00e3o constitucional ter vindo permitir a existencia de tribunais maritimos. Em primeiro lugar, as normas questionadas, porque contrarias a vers\u00e3o originaria da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e mesmo que se entendesse terem sido repristinadas com a revis\u00e3o constitucional, n\u00e3o podem ser consideradas tribunais por n\u00e3o gozarem de garantias de independencia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[136519],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,91444,109580,133891,57082],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1075267","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-136519","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-funcao","kji_keyword-jurisdicional","kji_keyword-podem","kji_keyword-tribunais","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FUN\u00c7\u00c3O JURISDICIONAL. I - A Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o reserva a fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional aos tribunais, competindo a estes, e so a estes, a administra\u00e7\u00e3o da justi\u00e7a. II - A atribui\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional de determinada competencia a certo org\u00e3o de soberania exclui a possibilidade de ela poder vir a ser legalmente atribuida a qualquer outro, salvo implicita ou explicita autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional. III - Os capit\u00e3es de porto n\u00e3o s\u00e3o tribunais, nem com eles podem ser confundidos, porque se integram na Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Publica e n\u00e3o se podem desdobrar em dois ou mais org\u00e3os para efeito do exercicio desta ou daquela fun\u00e7\u00e3o estruturalmente diversa, e porque lhes falece a independencia pessoal, que se exige e garante aos juizes, e que tem como pressuposto minimo a respectiva inamovibilidade. IV - O acto praticado pelo capit\u00e3o de porto que dirime um conflito de interesses, resolve um litigio, julga uma lide, e o exercicio de tal competencia n\u00e3o se integra na fun\u00e7\u00e3o administrativa, mas na jurisdicional. V - As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o s\u00e3o alteradas pela circunstancia de, na pendencia do processo, a lei de revis\u00e3o constitucional ter vindo permitir a existencia de tribunais maritimos. Em primeiro lugar, as normas questionadas, porque contrarias a vers\u00e3o originaria da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e mesmo que se entendesse terem sido repristinadas com a revis\u00e3o constitucional, n\u00e3o podem ser consideradas tribunais por n\u00e3o gozarem de garantias de independencia.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T00:17:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04","og_description":"Relator: FUN\u00c7\u00c3O JURISDICIONAL. I - A Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o reserva a fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional aos tribunais, competindo a estes, e so a estes, a administra\u00e7\u00e3o da justi\u00e7a. II - A atribui\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional de determinada competencia a certo org\u00e3o de soberania exclui a possibilidade de ela poder vir a ser legalmente atribuida a qualquer outro, salvo implicita ou explicita autoriza\u00e7\u00e3o constitucional. III - Os capit\u00e3es de porto n\u00e3o s\u00e3o tribunais, nem com eles podem ser confundidos, porque se integram na Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Publica e n\u00e3o se podem desdobrar em dois ou mais org\u00e3os para efeito do exercicio desta ou daquela fun\u00e7\u00e3o estruturalmente diversa, e porque lhes falece a independencia pessoal, que se exige e garante aos juizes, e que tem como pressuposto minimo a respectiva inamovibilidade. IV - O acto praticado pelo capit\u00e3o de porto que dirime um conflito de interesses, resolve um litigio, julga uma lide, e o exercicio de tal competencia n\u00e3o se integra na fun\u00e7\u00e3o administrativa, mas na jurisdicional. V - As conclus\u00f5es anteriores n\u00e3o s\u00e3o alteradas pela circunstancia de, na pendencia do processo, a lei de revis\u00e3o constitucional ter vindo permitir a existencia de tribunais maritimos. Em primeiro lugar, as normas questionadas, porque contrarias a vers\u00e3o originaria da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e mesmo que se entendesse terem sido repristinadas com a revis\u00e3o constitucional, n\u00e3o podem ser consideradas tribunais por n\u00e3o gozarem de garantias de independencia.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T00:17:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-83-0049-1984-07-04\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 83-0049 \u2013 1984-07-04"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1075267","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1075267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1075267"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1075267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}