{"id":1077918,"date":"2026-06-12T09:40:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T07:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T09:40:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T07:40:19","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ACESSO AOS TRIBUNAIS. I – Considera-se que o recorrente suscitou a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade durante o processo quando, durante ele, arguiu a norma impugnada de viola\u00e7\u00e3o do principio da igualdade processual entre as partes, mesmo que n\u00e3o tenha aferido expressamente a norma em causa com a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o mas antes, apenas, com conven\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais. II – O principio da igualdade n\u00e3o exige uma parifica\u00e7\u00e3o absoluta no tratamento das situa\u00e7\u00f5es, mas apenas o tratamento igual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es iguais entre si e o tratamento desigual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es desiguais, de modo que a disciplina juridica prevista seja igual quando uniformes as condi\u00e7\u00f5es objectivas das hipoteses ou previs\u00f5es reguladas e desigual quando falte tal uniformidade. III – A norma do artigo 485, alinea b) do Codigo de Processo Civil que excepciona o Ministerio Publico da regra segundo a qual se tem por confessados os factos alegados pelo autor quando o reu n\u00e3o contesta, n\u00e3o ofende o principio de igualdade, porquanto visa acautelar os interesses daqueles que – ao contrario dos a quem se aplica a regra da comina\u00e7\u00e3o – s\u00e3o representados oelo Ministerio Publico e n\u00e3o podem, por si sos, manifestar a sua vontade.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ACESSO AOS TRIBUNAIS. I – Considera-se que o recorrente suscitou a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade durante o processo quando, durante ele, arguiu a norma impugnada de viola\u00e7\u00e3o do principio da igualdade processual entre as partes, mesmo que n\u00e3o tenha aferido expressamente a norma em causa com a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o mas antes, apenas, com conven\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais. II – O principio da igualdade n\u00e3o exige uma parifica\u00e7\u00e3o absoluta no tratamento das situa\u00e7\u00f5es, mas apenas o tratamento igual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es iguais entre si e o tratamento desigual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es desiguais, de modo que a disciplina juridica prevista seja igual quando uniformes as condi\u00e7\u00f5es objectivas das hipoteses ou previs\u00f5es reguladas e desigual quando falte tal uniformidade. III – A norma do artigo 485, alinea b) do Codigo de Processo Civil que excepciona o Ministerio Publico da regra segundo a qual se tem por confessados os factos alegados pelo autor quando o reu n\u00e3o contesta, n\u00e3o ofende o principio de igualdade, porquanto visa acautelar os interesses daqueles que – ao contrario dos a quem se aplica a regra da comina\u00e7\u00e3o – s\u00e3o representados oelo Ministerio Publico e n\u00e3o podem, por si sos, manifestar a sua vontade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[135461],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[41105,53015,68882,7771,58838],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1077918","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-135461","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-igualdade","kji_keyword-norma","kji_keyword-principio","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-quando","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ACESSO AOS TRIBUNAIS. I - Considera-se que o recorrente suscitou a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade durante o processo quando, durante ele, arguiu a norma impugnada de viola\u00e7\u00e3o do principio da igualdade processual entre as partes, mesmo que n\u00e3o tenha aferido expressamente a norma em causa com a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o mas antes, apenas, com conven\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais. II - O principio da igualdade n\u00e3o exige uma parifica\u00e7\u00e3o absoluta no tratamento das situa\u00e7\u00f5es, mas apenas o tratamento igual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es iguais entre si e o tratamento desigual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es desiguais, de modo que a disciplina juridica prevista seja igual quando uniformes as condi\u00e7\u00f5es objectivas das hipoteses ou previs\u00f5es reguladas e desigual quando falte tal uniformidade. III - A norma do artigo 485, alinea b) do Codigo de Processo Civil que excepciona o Ministerio Publico da regra segundo a qual se tem por confessados os factos alegados pelo autor quando o reu n\u00e3o contesta, n\u00e3o ofende o principio de igualdade, porquanto visa acautelar os interesses daqueles que - ao contrario dos a quem se aplica a regra da comina\u00e7\u00e3o - s\u00e3o representados oelo Ministerio Publico e n\u00e3o podem, por si sos, manifestar a sua vontade.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T07:40:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19","og_description":"Relator: ACESSO AOS TRIBUNAIS. I - Considera-se que o recorrente suscitou a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade durante o processo quando, durante ele, arguiu a norma impugnada de viola\u00e7\u00e3o do principio da igualdade processual entre as partes, mesmo que n\u00e3o tenha aferido expressamente a norma em causa com a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o mas antes, apenas, com conven\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais. II - O principio da igualdade n\u00e3o exige uma parifica\u00e7\u00e3o absoluta no tratamento das situa\u00e7\u00f5es, mas apenas o tratamento igual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es iguais entre si e o tratamento desigual de situa\u00e7\u00f5es desiguais, de modo que a disciplina juridica prevista seja igual quando uniformes as condi\u00e7\u00f5es objectivas das hipoteses ou previs\u00f5es reguladas e desigual quando falte tal uniformidade. III - A norma do artigo 485, alinea b) do Codigo de Processo Civil que excepciona o Ministerio Publico da regra segundo a qual se tem por confessados os factos alegados pelo autor quando o reu n\u00e3o contesta, n\u00e3o ofende o principio de igualdade, porquanto visa acautelar os interesses daqueles que - ao contrario dos a quem se aplica a regra da comina\u00e7\u00e3o - s\u00e3o representados oelo Ministerio Publico e n\u00e3o podem, por si sos, manifestar a sua vontade.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T07:40:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-85-0108-1986-11-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 85-0108 \u2013 1986-11-19"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1077918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1077918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1077918"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1077918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}