{"id":1078302,"date":"2026-06-12T10:51:53","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T08:51:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T10:51:53","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T08:51:53","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – A interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo da disposi\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional do artigo 75, n. 2 da Lei 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro – isto e, apos a interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso ordinario que n\u00e3o seja admitido com fundamento em irrecorribilidade da decis\u00e3o – pressup\u00f5e que a uma primeira decis\u00e3o, incidente sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, se siga uma segunda decis\u00e3o, que n\u00e3o admita o recurso ordinario da primeira. II – N\u00e3o preenche essa hipotese o caso em que o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional vem da decis\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu o recurso ordinario, tendo sido esta a primeira decis\u00e3o sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, uma vez que aplicou norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo Tribunal Constitucional. III – O recurso tambem n\u00e3o pode ser recebido ao abrigo das regras gerais de admiss\u00e3o de recursos de constitucionalidade por ter sido interposto intempestivamente.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – A interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo da disposi\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional do artigo 75, n. 2 da Lei 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro – isto e, apos a interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso ordinario que n\u00e3o seja admitido com fundamento em irrecorribilidade da decis\u00e3o – pressup\u00f5e que a uma primeira decis\u00e3o, incidente sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, se siga uma segunda decis\u00e3o, que n\u00e3o admita o recurso ordinario da primeira. II – N\u00e3o preenche essa hipotese o caso em que o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional vem da decis\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu o recurso ordinario, tendo sido esta a primeira decis\u00e3o sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, uma vez que aplicou norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo Tribunal Constitucional. III – O recurso tambem n\u00e3o pode ser recebido ao abrigo das regras gerais de admiss\u00e3o de recursos de constitucionalidade por ter sido interposto intempestivamente.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,82353,136428,9418,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1078302","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-decisao","kji_keyword-ordinario","kji_keyword-recurso","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - A interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo da disposi\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional do artigo 75, n. 2 da Lei 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro - isto e, apos a interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso ordinario que n\u00e3o seja admitido com fundamento em irrecorribilidade da decis\u00e3o - pressup\u00f5e que a uma primeira decis\u00e3o, incidente sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, se siga uma segunda decis\u00e3o, que n\u00e3o admita o recurso ordinario da primeira. II - N\u00e3o preenche essa hipotese o caso em que o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional vem da decis\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu o recurso ordinario, tendo sido esta a primeira decis\u00e3o sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, uma vez que aplicou norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo Tribunal Constitucional. III - O recurso tambem n\u00e3o pode ser recebido ao abrigo das regras gerais de admiss\u00e3o de recursos de constitucionalidade por ter sido interposto intempestivamente.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T08:51:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - A interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo da disposi\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional do artigo 75, n. 2 da Lei 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro - isto e, apos a interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso ordinario que n\u00e3o seja admitido com fundamento em irrecorribilidade da decis\u00e3o - pressup\u00f5e que a uma primeira decis\u00e3o, incidente sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, se siga uma segunda decis\u00e3o, que n\u00e3o admita o recurso ordinario da primeira. II - N\u00e3o preenche essa hipotese o caso em que o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional vem da decis\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu o recurso ordinario, tendo sido esta a primeira decis\u00e3o sobre a quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade, uma vez que aplicou norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo Tribunal Constitucional. III - O recurso tambem n\u00e3o pode ser recebido ao abrigo das regras gerais de admiss\u00e3o de recursos de constitucionalidade por ter sido interposto intempestivamente.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T08:51:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0276-1987-02-04\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0276 \u2013 1987-02-04"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1078302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1078302"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1078302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}