{"id":1078528,"date":"2026-06-12T11:37:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T09:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T11:37:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T09:37:42","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I &#8211; Ha interesse juridico relevante no conhecimento pelo Tribunal Constitucional de recurso para ele interposto contra a senten\u00e7a que anulou a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o de um org\u00e3o administrativo, que suspendera de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e de vencimento de exercicio um funcionario contra o qual fora proferido, com transito em julgado, despacho de pronuncia em processo de querela, fundamentando (a senten\u00e7a recorrida) tal anula\u00e7\u00e3o na inconstitucionalidade, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do n. 4 do artigo 30 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, da norma constante do n. 1 do artigo 6 do Estatuto Disciplinar dos Funcionarios e Agentes da Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Central, Regional e Local, aprovado pelo Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro. II &#8211; E que do sentido do juizo de constitucionalidade a emitir pelo Tribunal Constitucional depende directamente a solu\u00e7\u00e3o do caso: se a aludida norma for julgada inconstitucional, a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o ao abrigo da qual foi tomada n\u00e3o pode manter-se; se, ao inves, for julgada n\u00e3o inconstitucional, n\u00e3o ha motivo para invalidar tal delibera\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/atco1.nsf\/904714e45043f49b802565fa004a5fd7\/b775bec2cfe6da6f8025682d0064bbd3?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I &#8211; Ha interesse juridico relevante no conhecimento pelo Tribunal Constitucional de recurso para ele interposto contra a senten\u00e7a que anulou a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o de um org\u00e3o administrativo, que suspendera de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e de vencimento de exercicio um funcionario contra o qual fora proferido, com transito em julgado, despacho de pronuncia em processo de querela, fundamentando (a senten\u00e7a recorrida) tal anula\u00e7\u00e3o na inconstitucionalidade, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do n. 4 do artigo 30 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, da norma constante do n. 1 do artigo 6 do Estatuto Disciplinar dos Funcionarios e Agentes da Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Central, Regional e Local, aprovado pelo Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro. II &#8211; E que do sentido do juizo de constitucionalidade a emitir pelo Tribunal Constitucional depende directamente a solu\u00e7\u00e3o do caso: se a aludida norma for julgada inconstitucional, a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o ao abrigo da qual foi tomada n\u00e3o pode manter-se; se, ao inves, for julgada n\u00e3o inconstitucional, n\u00e3o ha motivo para invalidar tal delibera\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,32115,82321,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1078528","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-contra","kji_keyword-deliberacao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Ha interesse juridico relevante no conhecimento pelo Tribunal Constitucional de recurso para ele interposto contra a senten\u00e7a que anulou a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o de um org\u00e3o administrativo, que suspendera de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e de vencimento de exercicio um funcionario contra o qual fora proferido, com transito em julgado, despacho de pronuncia em processo de querela, fundamentando (a senten\u00e7a recorrida) tal anula\u00e7\u00e3o na inconstitucionalidade, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do n. 4 do artigo 30 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, da norma constante do n. 1 do artigo 6 do Estatuto Disciplinar dos Funcionarios e Agentes da Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Central, Regional e Local, aprovado pelo Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro. II - E que do sentido do juizo de constitucionalidade a emitir pelo Tribunal Constitucional depende directamente a solu\u00e7\u00e3o do caso: se a aludida norma for julgada inconstitucional, a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o ao abrigo da qual foi tomada n\u00e3o pode manter-se; se, ao inves, for julgada n\u00e3o inconstitucional, n\u00e3o ha motivo para invalidar tal delibera\u00e7\u00e3o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T09:37:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Ha interesse juridico relevante no conhecimento pelo Tribunal Constitucional de recurso para ele interposto contra a senten\u00e7a que anulou a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o de um org\u00e3o administrativo, que suspendera de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e de vencimento de exercicio um funcionario contra o qual fora proferido, com transito em julgado, despacho de pronuncia em processo de querela, fundamentando (a senten\u00e7a recorrida) tal anula\u00e7\u00e3o na inconstitucionalidade, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do n. 4 do artigo 30 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, da norma constante do n. 1 do artigo 6 do Estatuto Disciplinar dos Funcionarios e Agentes da Administra\u00e7\u00e3o Central, Regional e Local, aprovado pelo Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro. II - E que do sentido do juizo de constitucionalidade a emitir pelo Tribunal Constitucional depende directamente a solu\u00e7\u00e3o do caso: se a aludida norma for julgada inconstitucional, a delibera\u00e7\u00e3o ao abrigo da qual foi tomada n\u00e3o pode manter-se; se, ao inves, for julgada n\u00e3o inconstitucional, n\u00e3o ha motivo para invalidar tal delibera\u00e7\u00e3o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T09:37:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-03-11\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-03-11"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1078528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1078528"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1078528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}