{"id":1078727,"date":"2026-06-12T12:17:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T10:17:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T12:17:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T10:17:08","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Em recurso obrigatorio interposto pelo Ministerio Publico de decis\u00e3o que se recusou a aplicar norma com fundamento em inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o pode o recorrido particular pedir a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral das normas impugnadas, por o recurso ter ficado com o seu objecto definido no requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o, por os recursos visarem modificar as decis\u00f5es recorridas e n\u00e3o criar decis\u00f5es sobre materia nova, por o recorrido particular n\u00e3o ter legitimidade para fazer tal pedido e por ser ilegal o enxerto em processo de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o concreta do pedido de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o abstracta. II – Tendo sido declarada com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral a inconstitucionalidade de determinada norma, o Tribunal Constitucional limita-se a aplicar essa declara\u00e7\u00e3o ao caso concreto. III – A conclus\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o obsta o facto de n\u00e3o ter ainda sido publicada a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, uma vez que apenas a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos externos esta dependente da previa publica\u00e7\u00e3o dessa declara\u00e7\u00e3o, e o que esta em causa e a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos internos ou, pelo menos, a eles equiparadas.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Em recurso obrigatorio interposto pelo Ministerio Publico de decis\u00e3o que se recusou a aplicar norma com fundamento em inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o pode o recorrido particular pedir a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral das normas impugnadas, por o recurso ter ficado com o seu objecto definido no requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o, por os recursos visarem modificar as decis\u00f5es recorridas e n\u00e3o criar decis\u00f5es sobre materia nova, por o recorrido particular n\u00e3o ter legitimidade para fazer tal pedido e por ser ilegal o enxerto em processo de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o concreta do pedido de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o abstracta. II – Tendo sido declarada com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral a inconstitucionalidade de determinada norma, o Tribunal Constitucional limita-se a aplicar essa declara\u00e7\u00e3o ao caso concreto. III – A conclus\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o obsta o facto de n\u00e3o ter ainda sido publicada a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, uma vez que apenas a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos externos esta dependente da previa publica\u00e7\u00e3o dessa declara\u00e7\u00e3o, e o que esta em causa e a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos internos ou, pelo menos, a eles equiparadas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,83045,8523,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1078727","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-declaracao","kji_keyword-inconstitucionalidade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Em recurso obrigatorio interposto pelo Ministerio Publico de decis\u00e3o que se recusou a aplicar norma com fundamento em inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o pode o recorrido particular pedir a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral das normas impugnadas, por o recurso ter ficado com o seu objecto definido no requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o, por os recursos visarem modificar as decis\u00f5es recorridas e n\u00e3o criar decis\u00f5es sobre materia nova, por o recorrido particular n\u00e3o ter legitimidade para fazer tal pedido e por ser ilegal o enxerto em processo de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o concreta do pedido de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o abstracta. II - Tendo sido declarada com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral a inconstitucionalidade de determinada norma, o Tribunal Constitucional limita-se a aplicar essa declara\u00e7\u00e3o ao caso concreto. III - A conclus\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o obsta o facto de n\u00e3o ter ainda sido publicada a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, uma vez que apenas a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos externos esta dependente da previa publica\u00e7\u00e3o dessa declara\u00e7\u00e3o, e o que esta em causa e a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos internos ou, pelo menos, a eles equiparadas.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T10:17:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Em recurso obrigatorio interposto pelo Ministerio Publico de decis\u00e3o que se recusou a aplicar norma com fundamento em inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o pode o recorrido particular pedir a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral das normas impugnadas, por o recurso ter ficado com o seu objecto definido no requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o, por os recursos visarem modificar as decis\u00f5es recorridas e n\u00e3o criar decis\u00f5es sobre materia nova, por o recorrido particular n\u00e3o ter legitimidade para fazer tal pedido e por ser ilegal o enxerto em processo de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o concreta do pedido de fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o abstracta. II - Tendo sido declarada com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral a inconstitucionalidade de determinada norma, o Tribunal Constitucional limita-se a aplicar essa declara\u00e7\u00e3o ao caso concreto. III - A conclus\u00e3o anterior n\u00e3o obsta o facto de n\u00e3o ter ainda sido publicada a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, uma vez que apenas a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos externos esta dependente da previa publica\u00e7\u00e3o dessa declara\u00e7\u00e3o, e o que esta em causa e a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de efeitos internos ou, pelo menos, a eles equiparadas.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T10:17:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0048-1987-04-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0048 \u2013 1987-04-22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1078727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1078727"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1078727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}