{"id":1078977,"date":"2026-06-12T13:03:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:03:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T13:03:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:03:28","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que recusem a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de qualquer norma, com fundamento na sua inconstitucionalidade, ou que apliquem norma cuja inconstitucionalidade haja sido suscitada "durante o processo" (Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da Republica, artigo 280, n. 1, alineas a) e b); Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, artigo 70, n. 1, alineas a) e b)). II – Tanto o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o, como a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades da decis\u00e3o s\u00e3o meios inidoneos para se suscitar "ex novo" uma quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade. III – Tendo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade do Assento do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, de 3 de Maio de 1984, sido suscitada apenas no requerimento em que foi pedida a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, portanto, n\u00e3o "durante o processo", n\u00e3o podia ser admitido – como n\u00e3o foi – o recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que recusem a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de qualquer norma, com fundamento na sua inconstitucionalidade, ou que apliquem norma cuja inconstitucionalidade haja sido suscitada “durante o processo” (Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da Republica, artigo 280, n. 1, alineas a) e b); Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, artigo 70, n. 1, alineas a) e b)). II – Tanto o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o, como a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades da decis\u00e3o s\u00e3o meios inidoneos para se suscitar “ex novo” uma quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade. III – Tendo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade do Assento do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, de 3 de Maio de 1984, sido suscitada apenas no requerimento em que foi pedida a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, portanto, n\u00e3o “durante o processo”, n\u00e3o podia ser admitido – como n\u00e3o foi – o recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,9422,8523,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1078977","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-inconstitucionalidade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que recusem a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de qualquer norma, com fundamento na sua inconstitucionalidade, ou que apliquem norma cuja inconstitucionalidade haja sido suscitada "durante o processo" (Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da Republica, artigo 280, n. 1, alineas a) e b); Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, artigo 70, n. 1, alineas a) e b)). II - Tanto o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o, como a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades da decis\u00e3o s\u00e3o meios inidoneos para se suscitar "ex novo" uma quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade. III - Tendo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade do Assento do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, de 3 de Maio de 1984, sido suscitada apenas no requerimento em que foi pedida a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, portanto, n\u00e3o "durante o processo", n\u00e3o podia ser admitido - como n\u00e3o foi - o recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T11:03:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que recusem a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de qualquer norma, com fundamento na sua inconstitucionalidade, ou que apliquem norma cuja inconstitucionalidade haja sido suscitada \"durante o processo\" (Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da Republica, artigo 280, n. 1, alineas a) e b); Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, artigo 70, n. 1, alineas a) e b)). II - Tanto o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o, como a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades da decis\u00e3o s\u00e3o meios inidoneos para se suscitar \"ex novo\" uma quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade. III - Tendo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade do Assento do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, de 3 de Maio de 1984, sido suscitada apenas no requerimento em que foi pedida a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, portanto, n\u00e3o \"durante o processo\", n\u00e3o podia ser admitido - como n\u00e3o foi - o recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T11:03:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0059-1987-06-05\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0059 \u2013 1987-06-05"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1078977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1078977"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1078977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}