{"id":1078979,"date":"2026-06-12T13:03:35","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T13:03:35","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:03:35","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I – No quinquenio que antecedeu a edi\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, o quadro circunstancial (situa\u00e7\u00e3o tactica e juridica), base de consentimento dos Estados para a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de Genebra sobre o montante das taxas de juros de mora relativamente a letras e livran\u00e7as fixadas na Lei Uniforme Sobre Letras e Livran\u00e7as alterou-se profundamente. II – Verificam-se, deste modo, os pressupostos de altera\u00e7\u00e3o anormal das circunstancias em que foram fixadas as taxas de juro estabelecidas nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme, cujas raz\u00f5es foram invocadas no Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83 que elevou o montante dessa taxa de juro – artigo 4, com recep\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto na Portaria n. 581\/83, de 18 de Maio. III – A altera\u00e7\u00e3o dos pressupostos extinguiu, assim, o compromisso internacional do Estado Portugues, no que respeita ao montante da taxa de juro fixado nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme. IV – Consequentemente, o artigo 4 do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, n\u00e3o contraria qualquer norma de direito internacional convencional, n\u00e3o lhe sendo, por isso, atribuido nenhum vicio de inconstitucionalidade.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I – No quinquenio que antecedeu a edi\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, o quadro circunstancial (situa\u00e7\u00e3o tactica e juridica), base de consentimento dos Estados para a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de Genebra sobre o montante das taxas de juros de mora relativamente a letras e livran\u00e7as fixadas na Lei Uniforme Sobre Letras e Livran\u00e7as alterou-se profundamente. II – Verificam-se, deste modo, os pressupostos de altera\u00e7\u00e3o anormal das circunstancias em que foram fixadas as taxas de juro estabelecidas nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme, cujas raz\u00f5es foram invocadas no Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83 que elevou o montante dessa taxa de juro – artigo 4, com recep\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto na Portaria n. 581\/83, de 18 de Maio. III – A altera\u00e7\u00e3o dos pressupostos extinguiu, assim, o compromisso internacional do Estado Portugues, no que respeita ao montante da taxa de juro fixado nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme. IV – Consequentemente, o artigo 4 do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, n\u00e3o contraria qualquer norma de direito internacional convencional, n\u00e3o lhe sendo, por isso, atribuido nenhum vicio de inconstitucionalidade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[107296,137649,47407,17444,78561],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1078979","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-decreto-lei","kji_keyword-junho","kji_keyword-montante","kji_keyword-sobre","kji_keyword-uniforme","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - No quinquenio que antecedeu a edi\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, o quadro circunstancial (situa\u00e7\u00e3o tactica e juridica), base de consentimento dos Estados para a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de Genebra sobre o montante das taxas de juros de mora relativamente a letras e livran\u00e7as fixadas na Lei Uniforme Sobre Letras e Livran\u00e7as alterou-se profundamente. II - Verificam-se, deste modo, os pressupostos de altera\u00e7\u00e3o anormal das circunstancias em que foram fixadas as taxas de juro estabelecidas nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme, cujas raz\u00f5es foram invocadas no Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83 que elevou o montante dessa taxa de juro - artigo 4, com recep\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto na Portaria n. 581\/83, de 18 de Maio. III - A altera\u00e7\u00e3o dos pressupostos extinguiu, assim, o compromisso internacional do Estado Portugues, no que respeita ao montante da taxa de juro fixado nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme. IV - Consequentemente, o artigo 4 do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, n\u00e3o contraria qualquer norma de direito internacional convencional, n\u00e3o lhe sendo, por isso, atribuido nenhum vicio de inconstitucionalidade.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T11:03:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05","og_description":"Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - No quinquenio que antecedeu a edi\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, o quadro circunstancial (situa\u00e7\u00e3o tactica e juridica), base de consentimento dos Estados para a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de Genebra sobre o montante das taxas de juros de mora relativamente a letras e livran\u00e7as fixadas na Lei Uniforme Sobre Letras e Livran\u00e7as alterou-se profundamente. II - Verificam-se, deste modo, os pressupostos de altera\u00e7\u00e3o anormal das circunstancias em que foram fixadas as taxas de juro estabelecidas nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme, cujas raz\u00f5es foram invocadas no Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83 que elevou o montante dessa taxa de juro - artigo 4, com recep\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto na Portaria n. 581\/83, de 18 de Maio. III - A altera\u00e7\u00e3o dos pressupostos extinguiu, assim, o compromisso internacional do Estado Portugues, no que respeita ao montante da taxa de juro fixado nos artigos 48, n. 2 e 49, n. 2 da Lei Uniforme. IV - Consequentemente, o artigo 4 do Decreto-Lei n. 262\/83, de 16 de Junho, n\u00e3o contraria qualquer norma de direito internacional convencional, n\u00e3o lhe sendo, por isso, atribuido nenhum vicio de inconstitucionalidade.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T11:03:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0007-1987-06-05\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0007 \u2013 1987-06-05"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1078979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1078979"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1078979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}