{"id":1079014,"date":"2026-06-12T13:14:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T13:14:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:14:16","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – De acordo com o n. 5 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e a alinea f) do n. 1 do artigo 70 e o n. 3 do artigo 72, ambos da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, obrigatorio para o Ministerio Publico, das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que apliquem norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo proprio Tribunal Constitucional. II – N\u00e3o se mostrando que a decis\u00e3o impugnada tenha aplicado a norma questionada – o n. 5 do artigo 64 do Codigo da Estrada -, que n\u00e3o e invocada na senten\u00e7a condenatoria nem, mesmo, no auto de transgress\u00e3o onde, alias, se n\u00e3o refere que a velocidade do veiculo tenha sido determinada por aparelho ou instrumento utilizado na fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o do transito, for\u00e7oso e concluir que n\u00e3o se verifica o condicionalismo previsto naqueles preceitos legais, de que dependeria a admissibilidade do recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – De acordo com o n. 5 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e a alinea f) do n. 1 do artigo 70 e o n. 3 do artigo 72, ambos da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, obrigatorio para o Ministerio Publico, das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que apliquem norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo proprio Tribunal Constitucional. II – N\u00e3o se mostrando que a decis\u00e3o impugnada tenha aplicado a norma questionada – o n. 5 do artigo 64 do Codigo da Estrada -, que n\u00e3o e invocada na senten\u00e7a condenatoria nem, mesmo, no auto de transgress\u00e3o onde, alias, se n\u00e3o refere que a velocidade do veiculo tenha sido determinada por aparelho ou instrumento utilizado na fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o do transito, for\u00e7oso e concluir que n\u00e3o se verifica o condicionalismo previsto naqueles preceitos legais, de que dependeria a admissibilidade do recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[25223,9422,7771,9418,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1079014","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-artigo","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-recurso","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - De acordo com o n. 5 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e a alinea f) do n. 1 do artigo 70 e o n. 3 do artigo 72, ambos da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, obrigatorio para o Ministerio Publico, das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que apliquem norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo proprio Tribunal Constitucional. II - N\u00e3o se mostrando que a decis\u00e3o impugnada tenha aplicado a norma questionada - o n. 5 do artigo 64 do Codigo da Estrada -, que n\u00e3o e invocada na senten\u00e7a condenatoria nem, mesmo, no auto de transgress\u00e3o onde, alias, se n\u00e3o refere que a velocidade do veiculo tenha sido determinada por aparelho ou instrumento utilizado na fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o do transito, for\u00e7oso e concluir que n\u00e3o se verifica o condicionalismo previsto naqueles preceitos legais, de que dependeria a admissibilidade do recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T11:14:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - De acordo com o n. 5 do artigo 280 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e a alinea f) do n. 1 do artigo 70 e o n. 3 do artigo 72, ambos da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro, cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, obrigatorio para o Ministerio Publico, das decis\u00f5es dos tribunais que apliquem norma anteriormente julgada inconstitucional pelo proprio Tribunal Constitucional. II - N\u00e3o se mostrando que a decis\u00e3o impugnada tenha aplicado a norma questionada - o n. 5 do artigo 64 do Codigo da Estrada -, que n\u00e3o e invocada na senten\u00e7a condenatoria nem, mesmo, no auto de transgress\u00e3o onde, alias, se n\u00e3o refere que a velocidade do veiculo tenha sido determinada por aparelho ou instrumento utilizado na fiscaliza\u00e7\u00e3o do transito, for\u00e7oso e concluir que n\u00e3o se verifica o condicionalismo previsto naqueles preceitos legais, de que dependeria a admissibilidade do recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T11:14:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0070-1987-06-26\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0070 \u2013 1987-06-26"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1079014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1079014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1079014"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1079014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}