{"id":1080063,"date":"2026-06-12T16:45:56","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T14:45:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T16:45:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T14:45:56","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I – Deve entender-se que o recorrente suscitou durante o processo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade quando, apesar de a ter invocado de forma deficiente perante o tribunal recorrido, ja o havia feito anteriormente noutra instancia. II – Ha aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da norma para efeitos da alinea b) do n. 1 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 n\u00e3o so nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o expressa, como tambem nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o implicita.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I – Deve entender-se que o recorrente suscitou durante o processo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade quando, apesar de a ter invocado de forma deficiente perante o tribunal recorrido, ja o havia feito anteriormente noutra instancia. II – Ha aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da norma para efeitos da alinea b) do n. 1 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 n\u00e3o so nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o expressa, como tambem nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o implicita.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[92495,135722,8523,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1080063","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-aplicacao","kji_keyword-casos","kji_keyword-inconstitucionalidade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I - Deve entender-se que o recorrente suscitou durante o processo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade quando, apesar de a ter invocado de forma deficiente perante o tribunal recorrido, ja o havia feito anteriormente noutra instancia. II - Ha aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da norma para efeitos da alinea b) do n. 1 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 n\u00e3o so nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o expressa, como tambem nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o implicita.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T14:45:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07","og_description":"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I - Deve entender-se que o recorrente suscitou durante o processo a quest\u00e3o da inconstitucionalidade quando, apesar de a ter invocado de forma deficiente perante o tribunal recorrido, ja o havia feito anteriormente noutra instancia. II - Ha aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da norma para efeitos da alinea b) do n. 1 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 n\u00e3o so nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o expressa, como tambem nos casos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o implicita.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T14:45:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0082-1987-10-07\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0082 \u2013 1987-10-07"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1080063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1080063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1080063"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1080063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}