{"id":1080256,"date":"2026-06-12T17:26:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T15:26:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T17:26:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T15:26:28","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: TRABALHADOR DA ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O PUBLICA. I – A suspens\u00e3o de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e do vencimento de exercicio cominada no artigo 6, n. 1, do Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro, como consequencia necessaria do despacho de pronuncia com transito em julgado, n\u00e3o se traduz na perda de direitos, mas na sua mera suspens\u00e3o cautelar, pelo que n\u00e3o ofende o artigo 30, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. II – Aquela suspens\u00e3o n\u00e3o implica qualquer antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da pena nem um imediato juizo de censura, nem envolve um sacrificio desmedido, ja que o vencimento de categoria continua a ser abonado, pelo que o prejuizo imposto e proporcionado face as raz\u00f5es de ordem funcional – a defesa do prestigio dos servi\u00e7os – que o fundamentam, n\u00e3o violando, assim, a garantia da presun\u00e7\u00e3o da inocencia do arguido consagrada no artigo 32, n. 2, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: TRABALHADOR DA ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O PUBLICA. I – A suspens\u00e3o de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e do vencimento de exercicio cominada no artigo 6, n. 1, do Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro, como consequencia necessaria do despacho de pronuncia com transito em julgado, n\u00e3o se traduz na perda de direitos, mas na sua mera suspens\u00e3o cautelar, pelo que n\u00e3o ofende o artigo 30, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. II – Aquela suspens\u00e3o n\u00e3o implica qualquer antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da pena nem um imediato juizo de censura, nem envolve um sacrificio desmedido, ja que o vencimento de categoria continua a ser abonado, pelo que o prejuizo imposto e proporcionado face as raz\u00f5es de ordem funcional – a defesa do prestigio dos servi\u00e7os – que o fundamentam, n\u00e3o violando, assim, a garantia da presun\u00e7\u00e3o da inocencia do arguido consagrada no artigo 32, n. 2, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[25223,84753,83035,11003],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1080256","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-artigo","kji_keyword-constituicao","kji_keyword-suspensao","kji_keyword-vencimento","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: TRABALHADOR DA ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O PUBLICA. I - A suspens\u00e3o de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e do vencimento de exercicio cominada no artigo 6, n. 1, do Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro, como consequencia necessaria do despacho de pronuncia com transito em julgado, n\u00e3o se traduz na perda de direitos, mas na sua mera suspens\u00e3o cautelar, pelo que n\u00e3o ofende o artigo 30, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. II - Aquela suspens\u00e3o n\u00e3o implica qualquer antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da pena nem um imediato juizo de censura, nem envolve um sacrificio desmedido, ja que o vencimento de categoria continua a ser abonado, pelo que o prejuizo imposto e proporcionado face as raz\u00f5es de ordem funcional - a defesa do prestigio dos servi\u00e7os - que o fundamentam, n\u00e3o violando, assim, a garantia da presun\u00e7\u00e3o da inocencia do arguido consagrada no artigo 32, n. 2, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T15:26:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04","og_description":"Relator: TRABALHADOR DA ADMINISTRA\u00c7\u00c3O PUBLICA. I - A suspens\u00e3o de fun\u00e7\u00f5es e do vencimento de exercicio cominada no artigo 6, n. 1, do Decreto-Lei n. 24\/84, de 16 de Janeiro, como consequencia necessaria do despacho de pronuncia com transito em julgado, n\u00e3o se traduz na perda de direitos, mas na sua mera suspens\u00e3o cautelar, pelo que n\u00e3o ofende o artigo 30, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. II - Aquela suspens\u00e3o n\u00e3o implica qualquer antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da pena nem um imediato juizo de censura, nem envolve um sacrificio desmedido, ja que o vencimento de categoria continua a ser abonado, pelo que o prejuizo imposto e proporcionado face as raz\u00f5es de ordem funcional - a defesa do prestigio dos servi\u00e7os - que o fundamentam, n\u00e3o violando, assim, a garantia da presun\u00e7\u00e3o da inocencia do arguido consagrada no artigo 32, n. 2, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T15:26:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-86-0258-1987-11-04\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 86-0258 \u2013 1987-11-04"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1080256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1080256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1080256"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1080256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}