{"id":1080277,"date":"2026-06-12T17:32:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T15:32:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T17:32:57","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T15:32:57","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – O Tribunal Constitucional n\u00e3o deve pronunciar-se sobre a existencia de nulidades cometidas quer na primeira instancia quer na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, nem muito menos sobre a sua sana\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o se justificando, assim, a baixa dos autos para as autoridades reclamadas manterem ou revogarem as respectivas decis\u00f5es. II – Resulta do artigo 76, n. 4, da Lei do Tribunal Constitucional, que n\u00e3o cabe reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Tribunal Constitucional da decis\u00e3o do Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o sobre reclama\u00e7\u00e3o de despacho do juiz do tribunal de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois, nestes casos, a via processual adequada e o recurso da decis\u00e3o proferida na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o. III – N\u00e3o ha que conhecer de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o do despacho do juiz de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional nesta fase do processo, em que sobre a mesma reclama\u00e7\u00e3o ja se pronunciou este Tribunal. Com efeito caducou entretanto o prazo para a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o, que seria o do n. 2 do artigo 688 do Codigo do Processo Civil, sendo que a decis\u00e3o reclamada apenas indeferiu o requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso "hipotetico" ou " Condicional" para o Tribunal Constitucional. Por outro lado, acresce que a decis\u00e3o deste (proferida no acord\u00e3o n. 83\/87) constitui caso julgado formal sobre a inadmissibilidade da reclama\u00e7\u00e3o daquele despacho.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – O Tribunal Constitucional n\u00e3o deve pronunciar-se sobre a existencia de nulidades cometidas quer na primeira instancia quer na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, nem muito menos sobre a sua sana\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o se justificando, assim, a baixa dos autos para as autoridades reclamadas manterem ou revogarem as respectivas decis\u00f5es. II – Resulta do artigo 76, n. 4, da Lei do Tribunal Constitucional, que n\u00e3o cabe reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Tribunal Constitucional da decis\u00e3o do Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o sobre reclama\u00e7\u00e3o de despacho do juiz do tribunal de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois, nestes casos, a via processual adequada e o recurso da decis\u00e3o proferida na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o. III – N\u00e3o ha que conhecer de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o do despacho do juiz de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional nesta fase do processo, em que sobre a mesma reclama\u00e7\u00e3o ja se pronunciou este Tribunal. Com efeito caducou entretanto o prazo para a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o, que seria o do n. 2 do artigo 688 do Codigo do Processo Civil, sendo que a decis\u00e3o reclamada apenas indeferiu o requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso “hipotetico” ou ” Condicional” para o Tribunal Constitucional. Por outro lado, acresce que a decis\u00e3o deste (proferida no acord\u00e3o n. 83\/87) constitui caso julgado formal sobre a inadmissibilidade da reclama\u00e7\u00e3o daquele despacho.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[9422,7771,82423,17444,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1080277","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-reclamacao","kji_keyword-sobre","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - O Tribunal Constitucional n\u00e3o deve pronunciar-se sobre a existencia de nulidades cometidas quer na primeira instancia quer na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, nem muito menos sobre a sua sana\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o se justificando, assim, a baixa dos autos para as autoridades reclamadas manterem ou revogarem as respectivas decis\u00f5es. II - Resulta do artigo 76, n. 4, da Lei do Tribunal Constitucional, que n\u00e3o cabe reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Tribunal Constitucional da decis\u00e3o do Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o sobre reclama\u00e7\u00e3o de despacho do juiz do tribunal de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois, nestes casos, a via processual adequada e o recurso da decis\u00e3o proferida na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o. III - N\u00e3o ha que conhecer de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o do despacho do juiz de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional nesta fase do processo, em que sobre a mesma reclama\u00e7\u00e3o ja se pronunciou este Tribunal. Com efeito caducou entretanto o prazo para a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o, que seria o do n. 2 do artigo 688 do Codigo do Processo Civil, sendo que a decis\u00e3o reclamada apenas indeferiu o requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso "hipotetico" ou " Condicional" para o Tribunal Constitucional. Por outro lado, acresce que a decis\u00e3o deste (proferida no acord\u00e3o n. 83\/87) constitui caso julgado formal sobre a inadmissibilidade da reclama\u00e7\u00e3o daquele despacho.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T15:32:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - O Tribunal Constitucional n\u00e3o deve pronunciar-se sobre a existencia de nulidades cometidas quer na primeira instancia quer na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o, nem muito menos sobre a sua sana\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o se justificando, assim, a baixa dos autos para as autoridades reclamadas manterem ou revogarem as respectivas decis\u00f5es. II - Resulta do artigo 76, n. 4, da Lei do Tribunal Constitucional, que n\u00e3o cabe reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Tribunal Constitucional da decis\u00e3o do Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o sobre reclama\u00e7\u00e3o de despacho do juiz do tribunal de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, pois, nestes casos, a via processual adequada e o recurso da decis\u00e3o proferida na Rela\u00e7\u00e3o. III - N\u00e3o ha que conhecer de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o do despacho do juiz de primeira instancia que n\u00e3o admite o recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional nesta fase do processo, em que sobre a mesma reclama\u00e7\u00e3o ja se pronunciou este Tribunal. Com efeito caducou entretanto o prazo para a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o, que seria o do n. 2 do artigo 688 do Codigo do Processo Civil, sendo que a decis\u00e3o reclamada apenas indeferiu o requerimento de interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso \"hipotetico\" ou \" Condicional\" para o Tribunal Constitucional. Por outro lado, acresce que a decis\u00e3o deste (proferida no acord\u00e3o n. 83\/87) constitui caso julgado formal sobre a inadmissibilidade da reclama\u00e7\u00e3o daquele despacho.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T15:32:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-87-0292-1987-11-18\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 87-0292 \u2013 1987-11-18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1080277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1080277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1080277"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1080277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}