{"id":1083083,"date":"2026-06-13T01:33:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T23:33:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T01:33:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T23:33:28","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 72 DU 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018<\/p>\n

CABINET D\u2019ARCHITECTURE PATH\u00c9 GU\u00c9YE SARL c\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 PIDYNAMICS SAS<\/p>\n

APPEL \u2013 COMPUTATION DU D\u00c9LAI DE 30 JOURS MAXIMUM ENTRE L\u2019ACTE D\u2019APPEL ET LA DATE DE L\u2019AUDIENCE \u2013 APPLICABILIT\u00c9 DES D\u00c9LAIS DE DISTANCE \u2013 INDIFF\u00c9RENCE DE L\u2019\u00c9LECTION DE DOMICILE<\/p>\n

Il r\u00e9sulte des articles 41, 42, 66, 255 et 272 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile que, sous peine de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance, si l\u2019appelant qui doit fixer l\u2019audience \u00e0 une date ne pouvant exc\u00e9der 30 jours \u00e0 compter de l\u2019acte d\u2019appel, n\u2019a pas enr\u00f4l\u00e9 son appel \u00e0 la date pr\u00e9vue, il doit, dans le d\u00e9lai de 15 jours, servir \u00e0 venir contenant assignation \u00e0 compara\u00eetre dans ce m\u00eame d\u00e9lai, suivant la date de la premi\u00e8re audience fix\u00e9e par l\u2019acte d\u2019appel, sous r\u00e9serve des d\u00e9lais de distance ;<\/p>\n

Viole ces textes l\u2019arr\u00eat qui, pour d\u00e9clarer l\u2019appelant d\u00e9chu en application de l\u2019article 266 du CPC, retient qu\u2019il ne peut se pr\u00e9valoir des d\u00e9lais de distance, l\u2019intim\u00e9 ayant \u00e9lu domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil, alors que l\u2019exploit d\u2019huissier contenant assignation \u00e0 jour fixe, servi au domicile \u00e9lu au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal et destin\u00e9 \u00e0 une personne demeurant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger, ne fait pas obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019augmentation du d\u00e9lai \u00e0 laquelle il n\u2019est pas expres- s\u00e9ment renonc\u00e9.<\/p>\n

La Cour supr\u00eame, Ou\u00ef monsieur Waly F AYE, conseiller, en son rapport ; Vu les conclusions \u00e9crites de monsieur Ahmeth D IOUF, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, tendant \u00e0 la cassation ; Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2017-09 du 17 janvier 2017 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ; Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ; Sur le moyen unique tir\u00e9 de la violation des articles 41, 42 et 266 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile (CPC) :<\/p>\n

Vu les articles 41, 42 et 266 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, ensemble les articles 255 et 272 du m\u00eame code ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon ces textes, que, sous peine de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance, si l\u2019appelant qui doit fixer l\u2019audience \u00e0 une date ne pouvant exc\u00e9der 30 jours \u00e0 compter de l\u2019acte d\u2019appel, n\u2019a pas enr\u00f4l\u00e9 son appel \u00e0 la date pr\u00e9vue, il doit, dans le d\u00e9lai de 15 jours, servir \u00e0 venir conte- nant assignation \u00e0 comparaitre dans ce m\u00eame d\u00e9lai, suivant la date de la premi\u00e8re audience fix\u00e9e par l\u2019acte d\u2019appel, sous r\u00e9serve des d\u00e9lais de distance ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 (Dakar, le 09 mars 2017, n\u00b0 90) et l\u2019ordonnance n\u00b0 15 du 06 janvier 2017 du conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat, que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Pidynamics SAS qui a<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 15-16<\/p>\n

88 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n

estim\u00e9 que, le cabinet d\u2019architecture Path\u00e9 G AYE SARL n\u2019a pas honor\u00e9 ses engagements r\u00e9sultant du contrat conclu avec elle, le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2013, pour la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019une \u00e9tude thermique d\u2019un co\u00fbt total de 8 000 000 Fcfa, l\u2019a assign\u00e9 devant le tribunal r\u00e9gio- nal de Dakar, en paiement de la somme reliquataire de 4 000 000 Fcfa ; que par juge- ment, le tribunal a fait droit \u00e0 ses demandes ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que, pour rejeter le d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 et d\u00e9clarer le cabinet d\u2019architecture Path\u00e9 G U\u00c8YE d\u00e9chu de son appel, la cour d\u2019Appel a constat\u00e9\u00ab que l\u2019intim\u00e9 a \u00e9lu domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil sis au 76 rue Mouss\u00e9 Diop, angle rue de Thiong o\u00f9 lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 servis aussi bien l\u2019acte d\u2019appel que l\u2019assignation \u00e0 compara\u00eetre \u00bb ; puis retenu que ce domicile sp\u00e9- cial cr\u00e9\u00e9 volontairement par lui se substitue enti\u00e8rement \u00e0 son domicile r\u00e9el pour tous les actes de la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure et que d\u00e8s lors l\u2019appelant ne peut se pr\u00e9valoir des d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus par les articles 41 et 42 du CPC \u00bb, pour en d\u00e9duire que l\u2019appelant qui a servi assignation le 16 juin 2017 pour l\u2019audience du 14 ao\u00fbt 2017, a m\u00e9connu les dispo- sitions de l\u2019article 266 du CPC ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, alors que l\u2019exploit d\u2019huissier contenant assignation \u00e0 jour fixe, servi au domicile \u00e9lu au S\u00e9n\u00e9gal et destin\u00e9 \u00e0 une personne demeurant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger, ne fait pas obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019augmentation du d\u00e9lai \u00e0 laquelle il n\u2019est pas express\u00e9ment renonc\u00e9, la cour d\u2019Appel a viol\u00e9 les textes susvis\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n

Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 90 du 09 mars 2017 de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar et l\u2019ordonnance n\u00b0 15 du 06 janvier 2017 du conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la cour d\u2019Appel de Saint-Louis ;<\/p>\n

Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu\u2019il sera transcrit sur les registres de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar, en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : EL HADJI MALICK SOW ; RAPPORTEUR : WALY FAYE ; CON- SEILLERS : AMADOU LAMINE BATHILY, WA LY FAYE, AMINATA LY NDIAYE, ADAMA NDIAYE ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : MATAR NDIAYE ; GREFFIER : MA\u00ceTRE MAURICE DIOMA KAMA.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2018<\/p>\n

Chambre civile et commerciale 89<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 72 DU 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 CABINET D\u2019ARCHITECTURE PATH\u00c9 GU\u00c9YE SARL c\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 PIDYNAMICS SAS APPEL \u2013 COMPUTATION DU D\u00c9LAI DE 30 JOURS MAXIMUM ENTRE L\u2019ACTE D\u2019APPEL ET LA DATE DE L\u2019AUDIENCE \u2013 APPLICABILIT\u00c9 DES D\u00c9LAIS DE DISTANCE \u2013 INDIFF\u00c9RENCE DE L\u2019\u00c9LECTION DE DOMICILE Il r\u00e9sulte des articles 41, 42, 66, 255 et 272 du code de proc\u00e9dure…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15227,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1083083","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 72 DU 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 CABINET D\u2019ARCHITECTURE PATH\u00c9 GU\u00c9YE SARL c\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 PIDYNAMICS SAS APPEL \u2013 COMPUTATION DU D\u00c9LAI DE 30 JOURS MAXIMUM ENTRE L\u2019ACTE D\u2019APPEL ET LA DATE DE L\u2019AUDIENCE \u2013 APPLICABILIT\u00c9 DES D\u00c9LAIS DE DISTANCE \u2013 INDIFF\u00c9RENCE DE L\u2019\u00c9LECTION DE DOMICILE Il r\u00e9sulte des articles 41, 42, 66, 255 et 272 du code de proc\u00e9dure...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-12T23:33:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 72 DU 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 CABINET D\u2019ARCHITECTURE PATH\u00c9 GU\u00c9YE SARL c\/ LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 PIDYNAMICS SAS APPEL \u2013 COMPUTATION DU D\u00c9LAI DE 30 JOURS MAXIMUM ENTRE L\u2019ACTE D\u2019APPEL ET LA DATE DE L\u2019AUDIENCE \u2013 APPLICABILIT\u00c9 DES D\u00c9LAIS DE DISTANCE \u2013 INDIFF\u00c9RENCE DE L\u2019\u00c9LECTION DE DOMICILE Il r\u00e9sulte des articles 41, 42, 66, 255 et 272 du code de proc\u00e9dure...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-12T23:33:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-72-du-19-septembre-2018\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 72 du 19 SEPTEMBRE 2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1083083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1083083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1083083"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1083083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}