{"id":1086152,"date":"2026-06-13T09:20:01","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T07:20:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T09:20:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T07:20:01","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE ORGANICA. I &#8211; Raz\u00f5es de ordem historica e raz\u00f5es de sistema confirmam a interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o segundo a qual a competencia exclusiva da Assembleia da Republica estabelecida no artigo 168, n. 1, alinea d), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o se limita a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e respectivo processo. II &#8211; Tem a natureza de disposi\u00e7\u00f5es integrativas do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e do respectivo processo a que se reporta aquele preceito constitucional, diversas normas contidas no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, entre as quais a que fixa os limites maximo e minimo das coimas. III &#8211; Assim, a nomea\u00e7\u00e3o editada pelo Governo que respeitar aos ilicitos contra-ordenacionais ha-de cingir-se aos limites maximo e minimo das coimas fixados no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, sob pena de envolver modifica\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o daqueles actos ilicitos e gerar inconstitucionalidade organica. IV &#8211; Porem a ilegitimidade constitucional de norma editada pelo Governo sem credencial parlamentar propria que fixa um limite maximo de coima superior ao limite maximo consentido no regime geral de ilicitude contra-ordenacional, apenas se situa na parte em que exceda este limite, nada obstaculando a que, dentro desse limite, o Governo possa editar outra norma\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/atco1.nsf\/904714e45043f49b802565fa004a5fd7\/b4bd64fbdb45cdac8025682d0064883d?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE ORGANICA. I &#8211; Raz\u00f5es de ordem historica e raz\u00f5es de sistema confirmam a interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o segundo a qual a competencia exclusiva da Assembleia da Republica estabelecida no artigo 168, n. 1, alinea d), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o se limita a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e respectivo processo. II &#8211; Tem a natureza de disposi\u00e7\u00f5es integrativas do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e do respectivo processo a que se reporta aquele preceito constitucional, diversas normas contidas no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, entre as quais a que fixa os limites maximo e minimo das coimas. III &#8211; Assim, a nomea\u00e7\u00e3o editada pelo Governo que respeitar aos ilicitos contra-ordenacionais ha-de cingir-se aos limites maximo e minimo das coimas fixados no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, sob pena de envolver modifica\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o daqueles actos ilicitos e gerar inconstitucionalidade organica. IV &#8211; Porem a ilegitimidade constitucional de norma editada pelo Governo sem credencial parlamentar propria que fixa um limite maximo de coima superior ao limite maximo consentido no regime geral de ilicitude contra-ordenacional, apenas se situa na parte em que exceda este limite, nada obstaculando a que, dentro desse limite, o Governo possa editar outra norma\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[136888],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[56371,137908,52494,139576,44938],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1086152","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-136888","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-geral","kji_keyword-ilicitos","kji_keyword-limite","kji_keyword-maximo","kji_keyword-regime","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE ORGANICA. I - Raz\u00f5es de ordem historica e raz\u00f5es de sistema confirmam a interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o segundo a qual a competencia exclusiva da Assembleia da Republica estabelecida no artigo 168, n. 1, alinea d), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o se limita a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e respectivo processo. II - Tem a natureza de disposi\u00e7\u00f5es integrativas do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e do respectivo processo a que se reporta aquele preceito constitucional, diversas normas contidas no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, entre as quais a que fixa os limites maximo e minimo das coimas. III - Assim, a nomea\u00e7\u00e3o editada pelo Governo que respeitar aos ilicitos contra-ordenacionais ha-de cingir-se aos limites maximo e minimo das coimas fixados no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, sob pena de envolver modifica\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o daqueles actos ilicitos e gerar inconstitucionalidade organica. IV - Porem a ilegitimidade constitucional de norma editada pelo Governo sem credencial parlamentar propria que fixa um limite maximo de coima superior ao limite maximo consentido no regime geral de ilicitude contra-ordenacional, apenas se situa na parte em que exceda este limite, nada obstaculando a que, dentro desse limite, o Governo possa editar outra norma\u00e7\u00e3o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T07:20:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09","og_description":"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE ORGANICA. I - Raz\u00f5es de ordem historica e raz\u00f5es de sistema confirmam a interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o segundo a qual a competencia exclusiva da Assembleia da Republica estabelecida no artigo 168, n. 1, alinea d), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o se limita a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e respectivo processo. II - Tem a natureza de disposi\u00e7\u00f5es integrativas do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o dos actos ilicitos de mera ordena\u00e7\u00e3o social e do respectivo processo a que se reporta aquele preceito constitucional, diversas normas contidas no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, entre as quais a que fixa os limites maximo e minimo das coimas. III - Assim, a nomea\u00e7\u00e3o editada pelo Governo que respeitar aos ilicitos contra-ordenacionais ha-de cingir-se aos limites maximo e minimo das coimas fixados no Decreto-Lei n. 433\/82, de 27 de Outubro, sob pena de envolver modifica\u00e7\u00e3o do regime geral de puni\u00e7\u00e3o daqueles actos ilicitos e gerar inconstitucionalidade organica. IV - Porem a ilegitimidade constitucional de norma editada pelo Governo sem credencial parlamentar propria que fixa um limite maximo de coima superior ao limite maximo consentido no regime geral de ilicitude contra-ordenacional, apenas se situa na parte em que exceda este limite, nada obstaculando a que, dentro desse limite, o Governo possa editar outra norma\u00e7\u00e3o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T07:20:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0311-1989-03-09\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0311 \u2013 1989-03-09"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1086152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1086152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1086152"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1086152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}