{"id":1086334,"date":"2026-06-13T09:53:39","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T07:53:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T09:53:39","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T07:53:39","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I. O pressuposto de admissibilidade dos recursos interpostos para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo do artigo 280, n. 1, alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o de que a inconstitucionalidade seja invocada durante o processo significa que tal quest\u00e3o deve ser suscitada antes de esgotado o poder jurisdicional do tribunal &quot;a quo&quot; a respeito dela &#8211; salvo a ocorrencia de qualquer situa\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional, em que o interessado n\u00e3o tenha tido &quot;oportunidade processual&quot; para levantar tal quest\u00e3o antes de proferida a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II. No caso, a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade foi suscitada perante o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a quando este ja havia negado a revista e havia esgotado, portanto, a possibilidade de conhecer tal quest\u00e3o. III. O comportamento processual dos reclamantes, traduzido nomeadamente no facto de virem a reclamar da n\u00e3o admiss\u00e3o de recurso para este Tribunal, depois de haverem dito n\u00e3o terem interposto esse recurso, denuncia um proposito dilatorio, que se reconduz a um &quot;uso manifestamente reprovavel&quot; do meio processual em presen\u00e7a.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/atco1.nsf\/904714e45043f49b802565fa004a5fd7\/eb2940961d7d22548025682d00648853?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I. O pressuposto de admissibilidade dos recursos interpostos para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo do artigo 280, n. 1, alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o de que a inconstitucionalidade seja invocada durante o processo significa que tal quest\u00e3o deve ser suscitada antes de esgotado o poder jurisdicional do tribunal &#8220;a quo&#8221; a respeito dela &#8211; salvo a ocorrencia de qualquer situa\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional, em que o interessado n\u00e3o tenha tido &#8220;oportunidade processual&#8221; para levantar tal quest\u00e3o antes de proferida a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II. No caso, a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade foi suscitada perante o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a quando este ja havia negado a revista e havia esgotado, portanto, a possibilidade de conhecer tal quest\u00e3o. III. O comportamento processual dos reclamantes, traduzido nomeadamente no facto de virem a reclamar da n\u00e3o admiss\u00e3o de recurso para este Tribunal, depois de haverem dito n\u00e3o terem interposto esse recurso, denuncia um proposito dilatorio, que se reconduz a um &#8220;uso manifestamente reprovavel&#8221; do meio processual em presen\u00e7a.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[136888],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[8523,7771,89731,136431,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1086334","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-136888","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-inconstitucionalidade","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-questao","kji_keyword-suscitada","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I. O pressuposto de admissibilidade dos recursos interpostos para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo do artigo 280, n. 1, alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o de que a inconstitucionalidade seja invocada durante o processo significa que tal quest\u00e3o deve ser suscitada antes de esgotado o poder jurisdicional do tribunal &quot;a quo&quot; a respeito dela - salvo a ocorrencia de qualquer situa\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional, em que o interessado n\u00e3o tenha tido &quot;oportunidade processual&quot; para levantar tal quest\u00e3o antes de proferida a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II. No caso, a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade foi suscitada perante o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a quando este ja havia negado a revista e havia esgotado, portanto, a possibilidade de conhecer tal quest\u00e3o. III. O comportamento processual dos reclamantes, traduzido nomeadamente no facto de virem a reclamar da n\u00e3o admiss\u00e3o de recurso para este Tribunal, depois de haverem dito n\u00e3o terem interposto esse recurso, denuncia um proposito dilatorio, que se reconduz a um &quot;uso manifestamente reprovavel&quot; do meio processual em presen\u00e7a.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T07:53:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12","og_description":"Relator: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SUSCITADA NO PROCESSO. I. O pressuposto de admissibilidade dos recursos interpostos para o Tribunal Constitucional ao abrigo do artigo 280, n. 1, alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o de que a inconstitucionalidade seja invocada durante o processo significa que tal quest\u00e3o deve ser suscitada antes de esgotado o poder jurisdicional do tribunal \"a quo\" a respeito dela - salvo a ocorrencia de qualquer situa\u00e7\u00e3o excepcional, em que o interessado n\u00e3o tenha tido \"oportunidade processual\" para levantar tal quest\u00e3o antes de proferida a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II. No caso, a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade foi suscitada perante o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a quando este ja havia negado a revista e havia esgotado, portanto, a possibilidade de conhecer tal quest\u00e3o. III. O comportamento processual dos reclamantes, traduzido nomeadamente no facto de virem a reclamar da n\u00e3o admiss\u00e3o de recurso para este Tribunal, depois de haverem dito n\u00e3o terem interposto esse recurso, denuncia um proposito dilatorio, que se reconduz a um \"uso manifestamente reprovavel\" do meio processual em presen\u00e7a.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T07:53:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0338-1989-04-12\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0338 \u2013 1989-04-12"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1086334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1086334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1086334"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1086334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}