{"id":1086620,"date":"2026-06-13T10:52:58","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T08:52:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T10:52:58","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T08:52:58","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: OBJEC\u00c7\u00c3O DE CONSCIENCIA. I. Nada permite concluir que a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o imponha uma via necessariamente judicial para a obten\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia, com obrigatoria exclus\u00e3o da via administrativa. II. N\u00e3o sendo constitucionalmente ilegitima a via administrativa para o regime geral da aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia (desde que salvaguardada a garantia de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o judicial), e obvio que a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, em tais moldes, de um regime transitorio especial em nada afronta as normas dos artigos 205 e 206 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. III. Tal regime tambem n\u00e3o ofende o principio da igualdade, visto que a diferencia\u00e7\u00e3o estabelecida pelo legislador ordinario entre os regimes geral e transitorio especial de atribui\u00e7\u00e3o do estatuto de objector de consciencia n\u00e3o p\u00f5e em causa o direito substantivo que a todos os cidad\u00e3os assiste de o virem adquirir e a discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o existente, sendo de ordem processual, visa mesmo permitir que determinadas categorias de cidad\u00e3os, objectivamente colocados em situa\u00e7\u00f5es distintas, n\u00e3o sofram, por raz\u00f5es que lhes n\u00e3o s\u00e3o imputaveis, um prejuizo mais gravoso do que a generalidade dos cidad\u00e3os na obten\u00e7\u00e3o daquele estatuto.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: OBJEC\u00c7\u00c3O DE CONSCIENCIA. I. Nada permite concluir que a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o imponha uma via necessariamente judicial para a obten\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia, com obrigatoria exclus\u00e3o da via administrativa. II. N\u00e3o sendo constitucionalmente ilegitima a via administrativa para o regime geral da aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia (desde que salvaguardada a garantia de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o judicial), e obvio que a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, em tais moldes, de um regime transitorio especial em nada afronta as normas dos artigos 205 e 206 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. III. Tal regime tambem n\u00e3o ofende o principio da igualdade, visto que a diferencia\u00e7\u00e3o estabelecida pelo legislador ordinario entre os regimes geral e transitorio especial de atribui\u00e7\u00e3o do estatuto de objector de consciencia n\u00e3o p\u00f5e em causa o direito substantivo que a todos os cidad\u00e3os assiste de o virem adquirir e a discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o existente, sendo de ordem processual, visa mesmo permitir que determinadas categorias de cidad\u00e3os, objectivamente colocados em situa\u00e7\u00f5es distintas, n\u00e3o sofram, por raz\u00f5es que lhes n\u00e3o s\u00e3o imputaveis, um prejuizo mais gravoso do que a generalidade dos cidad\u00e3os na obten\u00e7\u00e3o daquele estatuto.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[136888],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[137608,138304,84753,16942,44938],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1086620","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-136888","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-cidadaos","kji_keyword-consciencia","kji_keyword-constituicao","kji_keyword-objector","kji_keyword-regime","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: OBJEC\u00c7\u00c3O DE CONSCIENCIA. I. Nada permite concluir que a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o imponha uma via necessariamente judicial para a obten\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia, com obrigatoria exclus\u00e3o da via administrativa. II. N\u00e3o sendo constitucionalmente ilegitima a via administrativa para o regime geral da aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia (desde que salvaguardada a garantia de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o judicial), e obvio que a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, em tais moldes, de um regime transitorio especial em nada afronta as normas dos artigos 205 e 206 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. III. Tal regime tambem n\u00e3o ofende o principio da igualdade, visto que a diferencia\u00e7\u00e3o estabelecida pelo legislador ordinario entre os regimes geral e transitorio especial de atribui\u00e7\u00e3o do estatuto de objector de consciencia n\u00e3o p\u00f5e em causa o direito substantivo que a todos os cidad\u00e3os assiste de o virem adquirir e a discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o existente, sendo de ordem processual, visa mesmo permitir que determinadas categorias de cidad\u00e3os, objectivamente colocados em situa\u00e7\u00f5es distintas, n\u00e3o sofram, por raz\u00f5es que lhes n\u00e3o s\u00e3o imputaveis, um prejuizo mais gravoso do que a generalidade dos cidad\u00e3os na obten\u00e7\u00e3o daquele estatuto.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T08:52:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31","og_description":"Relator: OBJEC\u00c7\u00c3O DE CONSCIENCIA. I. Nada permite concluir que a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o imponha uma via necessariamente judicial para a obten\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia, com obrigatoria exclus\u00e3o da via administrativa. II. N\u00e3o sendo constitucionalmente ilegitima a via administrativa para o regime geral da aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o de objector de consciencia (desde que salvaguardada a garantia de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o judicial), e obvio que a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, em tais moldes, de um regime transitorio especial em nada afronta as normas dos artigos 205 e 206 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o. III. Tal regime tambem n\u00e3o ofende o principio da igualdade, visto que a diferencia\u00e7\u00e3o estabelecida pelo legislador ordinario entre os regimes geral e transitorio especial de atribui\u00e7\u00e3o do estatuto de objector de consciencia n\u00e3o p\u00f5e em causa o direito substantivo que a todos os cidad\u00e3os assiste de o virem adquirir e a discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o existente, sendo de ordem processual, visa mesmo permitir que determinadas categorias de cidad\u00e3os, objectivamente colocados em situa\u00e7\u00f5es distintas, n\u00e3o sofram, por raz\u00f5es que lhes n\u00e3o s\u00e3o imputaveis, um prejuizo mais gravoso do que a generalidade dos cidad\u00e3os na obten\u00e7\u00e3o daquele estatuto.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T08:52:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-0375-1989-05-31\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-0375 \u2013 1989-05-31"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1086620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1086620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1086620"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1086620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}