{"id":1088286,"date":"2026-06-13T14:38:38","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T12:38:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T14:38:38","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T12:38:38","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ADMISSIBILIDADE DO RECURSO. I – Jurisprudencia uniforme do Tribunal Constitucional tem considerado que n\u00e3o ha recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a dos acord\u00e3os da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o proferidos sobre recursos interpostos em processo de transgress\u00e3o, salvo quando a multa aplicada exceder 200 000$00, o que, no caso, n\u00e3o ocorre, pelo que do acord\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o cabe recurso ordinario. II – O Tribunal Constitucional tem reiteradamente entendido que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o de uma decis\u00e3o judicial ou a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o da sua nulidade n\u00e3o s\u00e3o ja meios idoneos e atempados para suscitar a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade porque o poder jurisdicional do tribunal recorrido ja se encontra esgotado. Assim, dessa decis\u00e3o judicial ja n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional. III – A invoca\u00e7\u00e3o pelo recorrente de que a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade so pode ser feita quando notificado do acord\u00e3o em causa, porque so ent\u00e3o foi confrontado com as posi\u00e7\u00f5es que reputa de inconstitucionais, n\u00e3o colhe porque as normas questionadas, envolvendo na sua literalidade imediata a perda do direito de recorrer por aceita\u00e7\u00e3o tacita de decis\u00e3o deveriam ter sido ainda durante o processo objecto de argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o sendo consentido ao recorrente ignorar que a estatui\u00e7\u00e3o contida em tais normas determinaria a n\u00e3o admissibilidade do recurso.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ADMISSIBILIDADE DO RECURSO. I – Jurisprudencia uniforme do Tribunal Constitucional tem considerado que n\u00e3o ha recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a dos acord\u00e3os da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o proferidos sobre recursos interpostos em processo de transgress\u00e3o, salvo quando a multa aplicada exceder 200 000$00, o que, no caso, n\u00e3o ocorre, pelo que do acord\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o cabe recurso ordinario. II – O Tribunal Constitucional tem reiteradamente entendido que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o de uma decis\u00e3o judicial ou a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o da sua nulidade n\u00e3o s\u00e3o ja meios idoneos e atempados para suscitar a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade porque o poder jurisdicional do tribunal recorrido ja se encontra esgotado. Assim, dessa decis\u00e3o judicial ja n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional. III – A invoca\u00e7\u00e3o pelo recorrente de que a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade so pode ser feita quando notificado do acord\u00e3o em causa, porque so ent\u00e3o foi confrontado com as posi\u00e7\u00f5es que reputa de inconstitucionais, n\u00e3o colhe porque as normas questionadas, envolvendo na sua literalidade imediata a perda do direito de recorrer por aceita\u00e7\u00e3o tacita de decis\u00e3o deveriam ter sido ainda durante o processo objecto de argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o sendo consentido ao recorrente ignorar que a estatui\u00e7\u00e3o contida em tais normas determinaria a n\u00e3o admissibilidade do recurso.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137171],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,9422,7771,9418,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1088286","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137171","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-recurso","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ADMISSIBILIDADE DO RECURSO. I - Jurisprudencia uniforme do Tribunal Constitucional tem considerado que n\u00e3o ha recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a dos acord\u00e3os da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o proferidos sobre recursos interpostos em processo de transgress\u00e3o, salvo quando a multa aplicada exceder 200 000$00, o que, no caso, n\u00e3o ocorre, pelo que do acord\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o cabe recurso ordinario. II - O Tribunal Constitucional tem reiteradamente entendido que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o de uma decis\u00e3o judicial ou a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o da sua nulidade n\u00e3o s\u00e3o ja meios idoneos e atempados para suscitar a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade porque o poder jurisdicional do tribunal recorrido ja se encontra esgotado. Assim, dessa decis\u00e3o judicial ja n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional. III - A invoca\u00e7\u00e3o pelo recorrente de que a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade so pode ser feita quando notificado do acord\u00e3o em causa, porque so ent\u00e3o foi confrontado com as posi\u00e7\u00f5es que reputa de inconstitucionais, n\u00e3o colhe porque as normas questionadas, envolvendo na sua literalidade imediata a perda do direito de recorrer por aceita\u00e7\u00e3o tacita de decis\u00e3o deveriam ter sido ainda durante o processo objecto de argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o sendo consentido ao recorrente ignorar que a estatui\u00e7\u00e3o contida em tais normas determinaria a n\u00e3o admissibilidade do recurso.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T12:38:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28","og_description":"Relator: ADMISSIBILIDADE DO RECURSO. I - Jurisprudencia uniforme do Tribunal Constitucional tem considerado que n\u00e3o ha recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a dos acord\u00e3os da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o proferidos sobre recursos interpostos em processo de transgress\u00e3o, salvo quando a multa aplicada exceder 200 000$00, o que, no caso, n\u00e3o ocorre, pelo que do acord\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o cabe recurso ordinario. II - O Tribunal Constitucional tem reiteradamente entendido que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o de uma decis\u00e3o judicial ou a reclama\u00e7\u00e3o da sua nulidade n\u00e3o s\u00e3o ja meios idoneos e atempados para suscitar a quest\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade porque o poder jurisdicional do tribunal recorrido ja se encontra esgotado. Assim, dessa decis\u00e3o judicial ja n\u00e3o cabe recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional. III - A invoca\u00e7\u00e3o pelo recorrente de que a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade so pode ser feita quando notificado do acord\u00e3o em causa, porque so ent\u00e3o foi confrontado com as posi\u00e7\u00f5es que reputa de inconstitucionais, n\u00e3o colhe porque as normas questionadas, envolvendo na sua literalidade imediata a perda do direito de recorrer por aceita\u00e7\u00e3o tacita de decis\u00e3o deveriam ter sido ainda durante o processo objecto de argui\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade, n\u00e3o sendo consentido ao recorrente ignorar que a estatui\u00e7\u00e3o contida em tais normas determinaria a n\u00e3o admissibilidade do recurso.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T12:38:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0170-1990-03-28\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0170 \u2013 1990-03-28"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1088286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1088286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1088286"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1088286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}