{"id":1088561,"date":"2026-06-13T15:14:04","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T13:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T15:14:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T13:14:04","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I &#8211; A admissibilidade do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto nos artigos 280, n. 1 alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e 70, n. 1, alinea b), da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro &#8211; recurso de decis\u00f5es que aplicaram norma cuja inconstitucionalidade fora suscitada durante o processo &#8211; depende, alem do mais, da verifica\u00e7\u00e3o do pressuposto do previo esgotamento dos meios ordinarios de recurso quanto a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II &#8211; Com este requisito o legislador pretendeu que o Tribunal Constitucional so fosse chamado a reapreciar, por essa via, decis\u00f5es que constituissem a ultima palavra dentro da ordem judiciaria a que pertence o tribunal que as tomou. III &#8211; Por isso, o conceito de recurso ordinario, tal como o n. 2 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 o utiliza, e de amplissima significa\u00e7\u00e3o, abrangendo as proprias reclama\u00e7\u00f5es para o presidente do tribunal ad quem das decis\u00f5es de n\u00e3o recebimento dos recursos interpostos no tribunal a quo. IV &#8211; Assim, n\u00e3o e de conhecer de recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional, de acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, por aquele acord\u00e3o ter sido posteriormente objecto de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Presidente do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a que, decidindo, substitui, ou consumiu, aquele acord\u00e3o.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/atco1.nsf\/904714e45043f49b802565fa004a5fd7\/238a6dc4a26b663e8025682d00640f21?OpenDocument&amp;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I &#8211; A admissibilidade do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto nos artigos 280, n. 1 alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e 70, n. 1, alinea b), da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro &#8211; recurso de decis\u00f5es que aplicaram norma cuja inconstitucionalidade fora suscitada durante o processo &#8211; depende, alem do mais, da verifica\u00e7\u00e3o do pressuposto do previo esgotamento dos meios ordinarios de recurso quanto a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II &#8211; Com este requisito o legislador pretendeu que o Tribunal Constitucional so fosse chamado a reapreciar, por essa via, decis\u00f5es que constituissem a ultima palavra dentro da ordem judiciaria a que pertence o tribunal que as tomou. III &#8211; Por isso, o conceito de recurso ordinario, tal como o n. 2 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 o utiliza, e de amplissima significa\u00e7\u00e3o, abrangendo as proprias reclama\u00e7\u00f5es para o presidente do tribunal ad quem das decis\u00f5es de n\u00e3o recebimento dos recursos interpostos no tribunal a quo. IV &#8211; Assim, n\u00e3o e de conhecer de recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional, de acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, por aquele acord\u00e3o ter sido posteriormente objecto de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Presidente do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a que, decidindo, substitui, ou consumiu, aquele acord\u00e3o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137171],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,9422,93151,9418,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1088561","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137171","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-decisoes","kji_keyword-recurso","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - A admissibilidade do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto nos artigos 280, n. 1 alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e 70, n. 1, alinea b), da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro - recurso de decis\u00f5es que aplicaram norma cuja inconstitucionalidade fora suscitada durante o processo - depende, alem do mais, da verifica\u00e7\u00e3o do pressuposto do previo esgotamento dos meios ordinarios de recurso quanto a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II - Com este requisito o legislador pretendeu que o Tribunal Constitucional so fosse chamado a reapreciar, por essa via, decis\u00f5es que constituissem a ultima palavra dentro da ordem judiciaria a que pertence o tribunal que as tomou. III - Por isso, o conceito de recurso ordinario, tal como o n. 2 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 o utiliza, e de amplissima significa\u00e7\u00e3o, abrangendo as proprias reclama\u00e7\u00f5es para o presidente do tribunal ad quem das decis\u00f5es de n\u00e3o recebimento dos recursos interpostos no tribunal a quo. IV - Assim, n\u00e3o e de conhecer de recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional, de acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, por aquele acord\u00e3o ter sido posteriormente objecto de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Presidente do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a que, decidindo, substitui, ou consumiu, aquele acord\u00e3o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T13:14:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22","og_description":"Relator: FISCALIZA\u00c7\u00c3O CONCRETA DA CONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - A admissibilidade do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto nos artigos 280, n. 1 alinea b), da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, e 70, n. 1, alinea b), da Lei n. 28\/82, de 15 de Novembro - recurso de decis\u00f5es que aplicaram norma cuja inconstitucionalidade fora suscitada durante o processo - depende, alem do mais, da verifica\u00e7\u00e3o do pressuposto do previo esgotamento dos meios ordinarios de recurso quanto a decis\u00e3o recorrida. II - Com este requisito o legislador pretendeu que o Tribunal Constitucional so fosse chamado a reapreciar, por essa via, decis\u00f5es que constituissem a ultima palavra dentro da ordem judiciaria a que pertence o tribunal que as tomou. III - Por isso, o conceito de recurso ordinario, tal como o n. 2 do artigo 70 da Lei n. 28\/82 o utiliza, e de amplissima significa\u00e7\u00e3o, abrangendo as proprias reclama\u00e7\u00f5es para o presidente do tribunal ad quem das decis\u00f5es de n\u00e3o recebimento dos recursos interpostos no tribunal a quo. IV - Assim, n\u00e3o e de conhecer de recurso interposto para o Tribunal Constitucional, de acord\u00e3o da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o que n\u00e3o admitiu recurso para o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a, por aquele acord\u00e3o ter sido posteriormente objecto de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o para o Presidente do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a que, decidindo, substitui, ou consumiu, aquele acord\u00e3o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T13:14:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-89-0007-1990-05-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 89-0007 \u2013 1990-05-22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1088561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1088561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1088561"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1088561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}