{"id":1089560,"date":"2026-06-13T17:38:23","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T15:38:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T17:38:23","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T15:38:23","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Uma vez decidida a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades n\u00e3o pode admitir-se que se pe\u00e7a a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do respectivo acord\u00e3o, tanto mais que no requerimento apresentado se pede uma "opini\u00e3o" do Tribunal e n\u00e3o uma qualquer decis\u00e3o. II – Existe litigancia de ma fe quando se conclui da analise do processo que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o mais n\u00e3o foi do que um expediente dilatorio para evitar por mais algum tempo a execu\u00e7\u00e3o do julgado. III – O Decreto-Lei n. 149-A\/83, na redac\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto- -Lei n. 72-A\/90, n\u00e3o regula o regime das condena\u00e7\u00f5es derivadas da litigancia de ma fe, as quais devera aplicar-se o regime de multas previsto no Codigo das Custas Judiciais, enquanto legisla\u00e7\u00e3o subsidiaria, sendo de atender, na sua fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, a particular censurabilidade da conduta do requerente.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I – Uma vez decidida a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades n\u00e3o pode admitir-se que se pe\u00e7a a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do respectivo acord\u00e3o, tanto mais que no requerimento apresentado se pede uma “opini\u00e3o” do Tribunal e n\u00e3o uma qualquer decis\u00e3o. II – Existe litigancia de ma fe quando se conclui da analise do processo que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o mais n\u00e3o foi do que um expediente dilatorio para evitar por mais algum tempo a execu\u00e7\u00e3o do julgado. III – O Decreto-Lei n. 149-A\/83, na redac\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto- -Lei n. 72-A\/90, n\u00e3o regula o regime das condena\u00e7\u00f5es derivadas da litigancia de ma fe, as quais devera aplicar-se o regime de multas previsto no Codigo das Custas Judiciais, enquanto legisla\u00e7\u00e3o subsidiaria, sendo de atender, na sua fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, a particular censurabilidade da conduta do requerente.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137171],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[83298,7772,9422,7771,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1089560","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137171","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-aclaracao","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-constitucional","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Uma vez decidida a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades n\u00e3o pode admitir-se que se pe\u00e7a a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do respectivo acord\u00e3o, tanto mais que no requerimento apresentado se pede uma "opini\u00e3o" do Tribunal e n\u00e3o uma qualquer decis\u00e3o. II - Existe litigancia de ma fe quando se conclui da analise do processo que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o mais n\u00e3o foi do que um expediente dilatorio para evitar por mais algum tempo a execu\u00e7\u00e3o do julgado. III - O Decreto-Lei n. 149-A\/83, na redac\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto- -Lei n. 72-A\/90, n\u00e3o regula o regime das condena\u00e7\u00f5es derivadas da litigancia de ma fe, as quais devera aplicar-se o regime de multas previsto no Codigo das Custas Judiciais, enquanto legisla\u00e7\u00e3o subsidiaria, sendo de atender, na sua fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, a particular censurabilidade da conduta do requerente.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T15:38:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL. I - Uma vez decidida a argui\u00e7\u00e3o de nulidades n\u00e3o pode admitir-se que se pe\u00e7a a aclara\u00e7\u00e3o do respectivo acord\u00e3o, tanto mais que no requerimento apresentado se pede uma \"opini\u00e3o\" do Tribunal e n\u00e3o uma qualquer decis\u00e3o. II - Existe litigancia de ma fe quando se conclui da analise do processo que o pedido de aclara\u00e7\u00e3o mais n\u00e3o foi do que um expediente dilatorio para evitar por mais algum tempo a execu\u00e7\u00e3o do julgado. III - O Decreto-Lei n. 149-A\/83, na redac\u00e7\u00e3o do Decreto- -Lei n. 72-A\/90, n\u00e3o regula o regime das condena\u00e7\u00f5es derivadas da litigancia de ma fe, as quais devera aplicar-se o regime de multas previsto no Codigo das Custas Judiciais, enquanto legisla\u00e7\u00e3o subsidiaria, sendo de atender, na sua fixa\u00e7\u00e3o, a particular censurabilidade da conduta do requerente.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T15:38:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-88-307a-1990-12-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 88-307A \u2013 1990-12-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1089560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1089560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1089560"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1089560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}