{"id":1089604,"date":"2026-06-13T17:48:35","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T15:48:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T17:48:35","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T15:48:35","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: APLICA\u00c7\u00c3O DE DECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I – Uma vez declarada a inconstitucionalidade, com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral, de certa norma, n\u00e3o e ja consentido ao Tribunal Constitucional proceder a reprecia\u00e7\u00e3o de quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade que tal norma tenha por objecto, pois que a vincula\u00e7\u00e3o a que tambem se acha sujeito lhe imp\u00f5e a mera aplica\u00e7\u00e3o aos casos concretos daquela sua anterior decis\u00e3o com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral. II – O principio de retroactividade de lei penal mais favoravel, pressup\u00f5e a validade das normas em causa, n\u00e3o podendo conduzir a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de normas posteriores inconstitucionais. III – A repristina\u00e7\u00e3o de normas revogadas, como consequencia de um juizo de inconstitucionalidade, e no caso de se tratar de normas penais, tem limites, pois n\u00e3o podera operar na parte em que provocar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, em concreto, de pena mais grave do que a prevista no momento da infrac\u00e7\u00e3o, por for\u00e7a do artigo 29, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: APLICA\u00c7\u00c3O DE DECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I – Uma vez declarada a inconstitucionalidade, com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral, de certa norma, n\u00e3o e ja consentido ao Tribunal Constitucional proceder a reprecia\u00e7\u00e3o de quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade que tal norma tenha por objecto, pois que a vincula\u00e7\u00e3o a que tambem se acha sujeito lhe imp\u00f5e a mera aplica\u00e7\u00e3o aos casos concretos daquela sua anterior decis\u00e3o com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral. II – O principio de retroactividade de lei penal mais favoravel, pressup\u00f5e a validade das normas em causa, n\u00e3o podendo conduzir a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de normas posteriores inconstitucionais. III – A repristina\u00e7\u00e3o de normas revogadas, como consequencia de um juizo de inconstitucionalidade, e no caso de se tratar de normas penais, tem limites, pois n\u00e3o podera operar na parte em que provocar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, em concreto, de pena mais grave do que a prevista no momento da infrac\u00e7\u00e3o, por for\u00e7a do artigo 29, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137511],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[92495,135700,8523,64147,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1089604","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-137511","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-aplicacao","kji_keyword-forca","kji_keyword-inconstitucionalidade","kji_keyword-normas","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: APLICA\u00c7\u00c3O DE DECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - Uma vez declarada a inconstitucionalidade, com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral, de certa norma, n\u00e3o e ja consentido ao Tribunal Constitucional proceder a reprecia\u00e7\u00e3o de quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade que tal norma tenha por objecto, pois que a vincula\u00e7\u00e3o a que tambem se acha sujeito lhe imp\u00f5e a mera aplica\u00e7\u00e3o aos casos concretos daquela sua anterior decis\u00e3o com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral. II - O principio de retroactividade de lei penal mais favoravel, pressup\u00f5e a validade das normas em causa, n\u00e3o podendo conduzir a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de normas posteriores inconstitucionais. III - A repristina\u00e7\u00e3o de normas revogadas, como consequencia de um juizo de inconstitucionalidade, e no caso de se tratar de normas penais, tem limites, pois n\u00e3o podera operar na parte em que provocar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, em concreto, de pena mais grave do que a prevista no momento da infrac\u00e7\u00e3o, por for\u00e7a do artigo 29, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T15:48:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22","og_description":"Relator: APLICA\u00c7\u00c3O DE DECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. I - Uma vez declarada a inconstitucionalidade, com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral, de certa norma, n\u00e3o e ja consentido ao Tribunal Constitucional proceder a reprecia\u00e7\u00e3o de quest\u00e3o de constitucionalidade que tal norma tenha por objecto, pois que a vincula\u00e7\u00e3o a que tambem se acha sujeito lhe imp\u00f5e a mera aplica\u00e7\u00e3o aos casos concretos daquela sua anterior decis\u00e3o com for\u00e7a obrigatoria geral. II - O principio de retroactividade de lei penal mais favoravel, pressup\u00f5e a validade das normas em causa, n\u00e3o podendo conduzir a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de normas posteriores inconstitucionais. III - A repristina\u00e7\u00e3o de normas revogadas, como consequencia de um juizo de inconstitucionalidade, e no caso de se tratar de normas penais, tem limites, pois n\u00e3o podera operar na parte em que provocar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, em concreto, de pena mais grave do que a prevista no momento da infrac\u00e7\u00e3o, por for\u00e7a do artigo 29, n. 4, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T15:48:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-90-oo84-1991-01-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 90-OO84 \u2013 1991-01-22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1089604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1089604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1089604"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1089604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}