{"id":1092402,"date":"2026-06-13T23:33:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T21:33:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T23:33:25","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T21:33:25","slug":"acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL.. I – Um dos pressupostos do recurso previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei 28\/82 \u00e9, a exig\u00eancia de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo tribunal "a quo", da norma cuja constitucionalidade foi questionada. E, identicamente no caso de um s\u00f3 segmento de uma norma ser questionado, que a norma, nesse mesmo segmento, venha a ser aplicada. II – Ora, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o aplicou a norma \u00ednsita no n\u00ba 1 do artigo 25\u00ba da L.P.T.A. na parte em que nela se condiciona o recurso \u00e0 circunst\u00e2ncia de serem definitivos e execut\u00f3rios. III – Consequentemente, e porque n\u00e3o se mostra aplicada pelo tribunal "a quo" uma norma naquele segmento que foi o questionado pela recorrente durante o processo, inexiste, no caso "sub specie", um dos pressupostos do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 280\u00ba da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei n\u00ba 28\/82.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL.. I – Um dos pressupostos do recurso previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei 28\/82 \u00e9, a exig\u00eancia de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo tribunal “a quo”, da norma cuja constitucionalidade foi questionada. E, identicamente no caso de um s\u00f3 segmento de uma norma ser questionado, que a norma, nesse mesmo segmento, venha a ser aplicada. II – Ora, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o aplicou a norma \u00ednsita no n\u00ba 1 do artigo 25\u00ba da L.P.T.A. na parte em que nela se condiciona o recurso \u00e0 circunst\u00e2ncia de serem definitivos e execut\u00f3rios. III – Consequentemente, e porque n\u00e3o se mostra aplicada pelo tribunal “a quo” uma norma naquele segmento que foi o questionado pela recorrente durante o processo, inexiste, no caso “sub specie”, um dos pressupostos do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 280\u00ba da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei n\u00ba 28\/82.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[135460],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[138318],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[25223,53015,7771,9418,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-1092402","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998","kji_year-138318","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-artigo","kji_keyword-norma","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-recurso","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL.. I - Um dos pressupostos do recurso previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei 28\/82 \u00e9, a exig\u00eancia de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo tribunal "a quo", da norma cuja constitucionalidade foi questionada. E, identicamente no caso de um s\u00f3 segmento de uma norma ser questionado, que a norma, nesse mesmo segmento, venha a ser aplicada. II - Ora, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o aplicou a norma \u00ednsita no n\u00ba 1 do artigo 25\u00ba da L.P.T.A. na parte em que nela se condiciona o recurso \u00e0 circunst\u00e2ncia de serem definitivos e execut\u00f3rios. III - Consequentemente, e porque n\u00e3o se mostra aplicada pelo tribunal "a quo" uma norma naquele segmento que foi o questionado pela recorrente durante o processo, inexiste, no caso "sub specie", um dos pressupostos do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 280\u00ba da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei n\u00ba 28\/82.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T21:33:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29","og_description":"Relator: PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL.. I - Um dos pressupostos do recurso previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei 28\/82 \u00e9, a exig\u00eancia de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo tribunal \"a quo\", da norma cuja constitucionalidade foi questionada. E, identicamente no caso de um s\u00f3 segmento de uma norma ser questionado, que a norma, nesse mesmo segmento, venha a ser aplicada. II - Ora, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido n\u00e3o aplicou a norma \u00ednsita no n\u00ba 1 do artigo 25\u00ba da L.P.T.A. na parte em que nela se condiciona o recurso \u00e0 circunst\u00e2ncia de serem definitivos e execut\u00f3rios. III - Consequentemente, e porque n\u00e3o se mostra aplicada pelo tribunal \"a quo\" uma norma naquele segmento que foi o questionado pela recorrente durante o processo, inexiste, no caso \"sub specie\", um dos pressupostos do recurso de constitucionalidade previsto na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 280\u00ba da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o e na al\u00ednea b) do n\u00ba 1 do artigo 70\u00ba da Lei n\u00ba 28\/82.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T21:33:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-constitucional-ate-1998-processo-91-0382-1992-01-29\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Constitucional (at\u00e9 1998) \u2013 Processo 91-0382 \u2013 1992-01-29"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1092402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1092402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1092402"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1092402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}