{"id":1092910,"date":"2026-06-14T00:20:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T00:20:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:20:00","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b014 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018<\/p>\n

LE GROUPEMENT GIC \/ SGS c\/ L\u2019ARMP & L\u2019AGEROUTE<\/p>\n

MARCH\u00c9S PUBLICS \u2013 R\u00c8GLEMENT DES LITIGES \u2013 INSTANCE \u2013 CONTRA- RI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9CISIONS SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 FORMELLE \u2013 CAUSE \u2013 ANNU- LATION D\u00c9CISION CRD\/ARMP<\/p>\n

Viole les dispositions des articles 90 et 91 du code des march\u00e9s publics, la d\u00e9cision par laquelle le CRD de l\u2019ARMP a, dans une m\u00eame instance, d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable un recours apr\u00e8s avoir au pr\u00e9alable admis sa recevabilit\u00e9 formelle.<\/p>\n

La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019Agence des travaux et de gestion des routes (AGEROUTE) a lanc\u00e9 une proc\u00e9dure de s\u00e9lection d\u2019un consultant pour la supervision des travaux de construction des routes de connexion \u00e0 l\u2019autoroute Thi\u00e8s-Touba ; qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019issue de l\u2019\u00e9valuation des offres techni- ques, le groupement GIc\/SGS, qui a obtenu la note technique de 90\/100 points sur une note minimale requise de 80 points, a \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9, par lettre du 29 ao\u00fbt 2016, \u00e0 se faire repr\u00e9senter \u00e0 l\u2019ouverture des offres financi\u00e8res ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019apr\u00e8s avoir demand\u00e9 et re\u00e7u le d\u00e9tail de sa notation par lettre du 02 septembre 2016, le groupement GIc\/SGS, non satisfait de la r\u00e9ponse de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 contractante, a saisi, le 6 sep- tembre 2016, le Comit\u00e9 de r\u00e8glement des diff\u00e9rends (CRD) qui, par d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 281\/16\/ARMP\/CRD du 13 septembre 2016, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 son recours recevable, ordonn\u00e9 la suspension de la proc\u00e9dure et demand\u00e9 la transmission des pi\u00e8ces n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 l\u2019instruction ;<\/p>\n

Que par d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 304\/16\/ARMP\/CRD du 05 octobre 2016, le CRD a r\u00e9tract\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision du 13 septembre 2016 et d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le recours du groupement GIc\/SGS irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

Que celui-ci a introduit le pr\u00e9sent recours en annulation contre cette d\u00e9cision en articulant trois griefs tir\u00e9s de la contrari\u00e9t\u00e9 de d\u00e9cisions, de la violation de la loi et du d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier grief tir\u00e9 de la contrari\u00e9t\u00e9 de d\u00e9cisions en ce que le CRD avait, par d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 281 du 13 septembre 2016, d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le recours du groupement recevable et ordon- n\u00e9 la suspension de la proc\u00e9dure de passation du march\u00e9 avant de se d\u00e9dire dans la m\u00eame cause et la m\u00eame instance en r\u00e9tractant cette d\u00e9cision pour d\u00e9clarer le m\u00eame recours irrece- vable ;<\/p>\n

Et sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur les autres griefs ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que, selon les dispositions de l\u2019article 90 alin\u00e9a 2 du code des march\u00e9s publics, le recours devant le CRD n\u2019est recevable que s\u2019il est fond\u00e9 sur une violation caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e de la r\u00e9glementation des march\u00e9s publics et est accompagn\u00e9 de la pi\u00e8ce attestant du paiement d\u2019une consignation ;<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 15-16<\/p>\n

172 Chambre administrative<\/p>\n

Que l\u2019article 91 du m\u00eame code ajoute que d\u00e8s r\u00e9ception du recours, le CRD examine si celui-ci est recevable et, dans l\u2019affirmative, ordonne \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 contractante de suspendre la proc\u00e9- dure de passation du march\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Consid\u00e9rant que, pour d\u00e9clarer irrecevable le recours du groupement, le CRD a constat\u00e9 avoir d\u00e9j\u00e0 d\u00e9clar\u00e9 ce recours recevable par d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 281\/16\/ARMP\/CRD du 13 septembre 2016 et a r\u00e9tract\u00e9 ladite d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant \u00e0 nouveau sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du recours, alors qu\u2019apr\u00e8s avoir re\u00e7u les docu- ments compl\u00e9mentaires demand\u00e9s dans le cadre de l\u2019instruction du recours, le CRD ne devait plus statuer que sur le fond du litige, la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e viole les dispositions suscit\u00e9es et, par cons\u00e9quent, encourt l\u2019annulation ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n

Annule la d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 304\/16\/ARMP\/CRD du 05 octobre 2016 du Comit\u00e9 de r\u00e8glement des diff\u00e9rends (CRD) de l\u2019Autorit\u00e9 de r\u00e9gulation des march\u00e9s publics (ARMP) d\u00e9clarant irreceva- ble le recours du groupement GIc\/SGS concernant la proc\u00e9dure de s\u00e9lection d\u2019un consultant pour la supervision des travaux de construction des routes de connexion \u00e0 l\u2019autoroute Thi\u00e8s- Touba, lanc\u00e9e par l\u2019Agence des travaux et de gestion des routes (AGEROUTE).<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre administrative, en son audience publique ordinaire tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Messieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : ABDOULAYE NDIAYE ; CONSEILLER : WALY FAYE ; RAPPORTEUR : WALY FAYE ; CONSEILLERS : MATAR DIOP, ADAMA NDIAYE, MBACK\u00c9 FALL ; GREFFIER : MACODOU NDIAYE.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2018<\/p>\n

Chambre administrative 173<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b014 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 LE GROUPEMENT GIC \/ SGS c\/ L\u2019ARMP & L\u2019AGEROUTE MARCH\u00c9S PUBLICS \u2013 R\u00c8GLEMENT DES LITIGES \u2013 INSTANCE \u2013 CONTRA- RI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9CISIONS SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 FORMELLE \u2013 CAUSE \u2013 ANNU- LATION D\u00c9CISION CRD\/ARMP Viole les dispositions des articles 90 et 91 du code des march\u00e9s publics, la d\u00e9cision par laquelle le CRD de l\u2019ARMP…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1092910","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b014 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 LE GROUPEMENT GIC \/ SGS c\/ L\u2019ARMP & L\u2019AGEROUTE MARCH\u00c9S PUBLICS \u2013 R\u00c8GLEMENT DES LITIGES \u2013 INSTANCE \u2013 CONTRA- RI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9CISIONS SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 FORMELLE \u2013 CAUSE \u2013 ANNU- LATION D\u00c9CISION CRD\/ARMP Viole les dispositions des articles 90 et 91 du code des march\u00e9s publics, la d\u00e9cision par laquelle le CRD de l\u2019ARMP...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T22:20:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b014 DU 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 LE GROUPEMENT GIC \/ SGS c\/ L\u2019ARMP & L\u2019AGEROUTE MARCH\u00c9S PUBLICS \u2013 R\u00c8GLEMENT DES LITIGES \u2013 INSTANCE \u2013 CONTRA- RI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 D\u00c9CISIONS SUR LA RECEVABILIT\u00c9 FORMELLE \u2013 CAUSE \u2013 ANNU- LATION D\u00c9CISION CRD\/ARMP Viole les dispositions des articles 90 et 91 du code des march\u00e9s publics, la d\u00e9cision par laquelle le CRD de l\u2019ARMP...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T22:20:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-14-du-22-fevrier-2018\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 14 du 22 F\u00c9VRIER 2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1092910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1092910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1092910"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1092910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}