{"id":1092983,"date":"2026-06-14T00:22:31","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:22:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T00:22:31","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:22:31","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b033 DU 12\/4\/ 2017<\/p>\n<p>LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 SIGELEC c\/ TIDIANE SIDIB\u00c9<\/p>\n<p>CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL \u2013 RUPTURE \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME \u2013 APPLICATIONS DIVERSES<\/p>\n<p>Constitue un motif l\u00e9gitime de licenciement le fait pour un travailleur, qui circulait en sens interdit avec le v\u00e9hicule de l\u2019entreprise, d\u2019avoir provoqu\u00e9 un accident.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 (Dakar, le 02 f\u00e9vrier 2016, n\u00b0 83), l\u2019accident de circu- lation r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme accident de travail ne saurait valablement justi- fier le licenciement de Tidiane S IDIB\u00c9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen tir\u00e9 de la d\u00e9naturation des faits ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que seul un \u00e9crit peut faire l\u2019objet d\u2019un pourvoi fond\u00e9 sur la d\u00e9natura- tion ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit qu\u2019il est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen pris de l\u2019 insuffisance de motifs, reproduit en annexe ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que ce moyen ne tend qu\u2019\u00e0 discuter les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de fait et de preuve souverainement appr\u00e9ci\u00e9s par les juges du fond ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit qu\u2019il est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le troisi\u00e8me moyen pris de la violation des articles 117 et 118 du COCC substitu\u00e9, en application de l\u2019article 72-4 de la loi organique sur la Cour supr\u00eame, \u00e0 la violation des articles L 54 et L 56 du code du travail ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu lesdits textes ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que pour d\u00e9clarer le licenciement de S IDIB\u00c9 abusif, l\u2019arr\u00eat a relev\u00e9 que, \u00ab s\u2019agissant de l\u2019accident de la circulation, il ressort du proc\u00e8s- verbal de la gendarmerie y aff\u00e9rent et produit aux d\u00e9bats, que l\u2019intim\u00e9 a admis circuler par inadvertance en sens interdit au moment de l\u2019accident\u2026. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en se d\u00e9terminant ainsi, alors qu\u2019elle avait relev\u00e9 que l\u2019accident de la cir- culation s\u2019est produit au moment o\u00f9 S IDIB\u00c9 circulait en sens interdit, la cour d\u2019A ppel,<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2017<\/p>\n<p>Chambre sociale 163<\/p>\n<p>qui n\u2019a pas tir\u00e9 les cons\u00e9quences l\u00e9gales de ses propres constatations, a viol\u00e9 les textes susvis\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n<p>Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 rendu le 02 f\u00e9vrier 2016 par la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoi la cause et les parties devant la cour d\u2019Appel de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la chambre sociale de la Cour supr\u00eame, en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Mes- sieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT, CONSEILLER DOYEN : AMADOU HAMADY DIALLO ; CONSEIL- LERS : AMINATA LY NDIAYE, AMADOU LAMINE BATHILY, IBRAHIMA SY, BABACAR DIALLO ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : OUMAR DI\u00c8YE ; AVOCATS : MA\u00ceTRE OUMAR FATY, MA\u00ceTRE SERIGNE KHASSIM TOUR \u00c9 ; GREFFIER : CHEIKH DIOP.<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2017<\/p>\n<p>Chambre sociale 163<\/p>\n<p>qui n\u2019a pas tir\u00e9 les cons\u00e9quences l\u00e9gales de ses propres constatations, a viol\u00e9 les textes susvis\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n<p>Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 83 rendu le 02 f\u00e9vrier 2016 par la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoi la cause et les parties devant la cour d\u2019Appel de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la chambre sociale de la Cour supr\u00eame, en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Mes- sieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT, CONSEILLER DOYEN : AMADOU HAMADY DIALLO ; CONSEIL- LERS : AMINATA LY NDIAYE, AMADOU LAMINE BATHILY, IBRAHIMA SY, BABACAR DIALLO ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : OUMAR DI\u00c8YE ; AVOCATS : MA\u00ceTRE OUMAR FATY, MA\u00ceTRE SERIGNE KHASSIM TOUR \u00c9 ; GREFFIER : CHEIKH DIOP.<\/p>\n<p>Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 13-14<\/p>\n<p>164 Chambre sociale<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b033 DU 12\/4\/ 2017 LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 SIGELEC c\/ TIDIANE SIDIB\u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL \u2013 RUPTURE \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME \u2013 APPLICATIONS DIVERSES Constitue un motif l\u00e9gitime de licenciement le fait pour un travailleur, qui circulait en sens interdit avec le v\u00e9hicule de l\u2019entreprise, d\u2019avoir provoqu\u00e9 un accident. La Cour supr\u00eame, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1092983","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b033 DU 12\/4\/ 2017 LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 SIGELEC c\/ TIDIANE SIDIB\u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL \u2013 RUPTURE \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME \u2013 APPLICATIONS DIVERSES Constitue un motif l\u00e9gitime de licenciement le fait pour un travailleur, qui circulait en sens interdit avec le v\u00e9hicule de l\u2019entreprise, d\u2019avoir provoqu\u00e9 un accident. La Cour supr\u00eame, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\\\/4\\\/ 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T22:22:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\\\/4\\\/ 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b033 DU 12\/4\/ 2017 LA SOCI\u00c9T\u00c9 SIGELEC c\/ TIDIANE SIDIB\u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL \u2013 RUPTURE \u2013 LICENCIEMENT \u2013 MOTIF L\u00c9GITIME \u2013 APPLICATIONS DIVERSES Constitue un motif l\u00e9gitime de licenciement le fait pour un travailleur, qui circulait en sens interdit avec le v\u00e9hicule de l\u2019entreprise, d\u2019avoir provoqu\u00e9 un accident. La Cour supr\u00eame, Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T22:22:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-33-du-12-4-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 33 du 12\/4\/ 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1092983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1092983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1092983"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1092983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}