{"id":1093093,"date":"2026-06-14T00:26:43","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:26:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T00:26:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:26:43","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 25 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017<\/p>\n<p>SERA c\/ AMADOU MBACK \u00c9 NDOYE<\/p>\n<p>PRESCRIPTION \u2013 POINT DE D\u00c9PART DE L\u2019ACTION EN GARANTIE POUR VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 DATE DE D\u00c9 COUVERTE DES VICES<\/p>\n<p>A fait l\u2019exacte application de l\u2019article 300 du COCC, la cour d\u2019Appel qui a retenu que le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie des vices cach\u00e9s correspond \u00e0 la date \u00e0 laquelle ils ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9ellement d\u00e9couverts.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n<p>Ou\u00ef Madame Aminata L Y NDIAYE, conseiller, en son rapport ;<\/p>\n<p>Ou\u00ef Monsieur Oumar D I\u00c8YE, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, en ses conclusions tendantau rejet du pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008- 35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 (Dakar, 11 d\u00e9cembre 2015 n\u00b0 329), que la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9quipement et de repr \u00e9sentation dite SERA a vendu un v\u00e9hicule neuf \u00e0 M. N DOYE, le 24 d\u00e9cembre 2010 ; que par une lettre du 25 mars 2013, elle a inform\u00e9 son client que le v\u00e9hicule comportait un \u00ab d\u00e9faut potentiel \u00bb et l\u2019a invit\u00e9 \u00e0 le lui pr\u00e9senter pour son ins- pection en vue d\u2019\u00e9ventuelles r\u00e9parations ; que pr\u00e9tendant que les d\u00e9fauts n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9s, apr\u00e8s deux jours de travaux effectu\u00e9es par le vendeur, M. N DOYE a fait experti- ser le v\u00e9hicule, le 19 avril 2013, et a assign\u00e9 la SERA en r\u00e9solution de la vente ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 300 du code des obl i- gations civiles et commerciales :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la SERA fait grief \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019accueillir la demande, apr\u00e8s avoir fix\u00e9 le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie pour vices cach\u00e9s \u00e0 la date de la d\u00e9couverte du vice alors, selon le moyen, que d\u2019une part, l\u2019article 300 pr\u00e9voit qu\u2019il revient au juge de d\u00e9terminer la dur\u00e9e du d\u00e9lai en fonction des \u00e9l\u00e9ments expos\u00e9s par la loi, \u00e0 savoir la nature du vice et les usages du lieu o\u00f9 la vente a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite, et que d\u2019autre part, ce texte exige que ladite action soit introduite dans un bref d\u00e9lai pour permettre la restitution, ce qui n\u2019est pas le cas en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce puisque la vente a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9e depuis l\u2019ann\u00e9e 2010 ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu qu\u2019ayant relev\u00e9 que les vices cach\u00e9s du v\u00e9hicule n\u2019ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9ellement d\u00e9couverts que le 19 avril 2013, jour o\u00f9 ils ont \u00e9t\u00e9 confirm\u00e9s par le rapport d\u2019expertise, la cour d\u2019Appel en a exactement d\u00e9duit que cette date constituait le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 13-14<\/p>\n<p>68 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n<p>Sur le second moyen tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 298 du COCC :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la SERA fait grief \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat de prononcer la r\u00e9solution de la vente alors, selon le moyen, que la restitution de la chose vendue est un pr\u00e9alabl e \u00e0 la restitution du prix ;<\/p>\n<p>Mais attendu que la r\u00e9solution d\u2019un contrat entra\u00eenant n\u00e9cessairement la restitution des prestations r\u00e9ciproques, selon les dispositions de l\u2019article 107 du COCC, la cour d\u2019Appel, qui n\u2019\u00e9tait pas tenue de l\u2019ordonner express\u00e9ment, n\u2019a pu violer le texte susvi- s\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen est mal fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n<p>Rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne la SERA aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu&#039;il sera transcrit sur les registres de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT : EL HADJI MALICK SOW ; RAPPORTEUR : WALY FAYE ; CONSEILLERS : WALY FAYE, SOULEYMANE KANE, AMINATA LY NDIAYE, SEYDINA ISSA SOW ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : OUMAR DI\u00c8YE ; GREFFIER : MA\u00ce- TRE MAURICE DIOMA KAMA.<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2017<\/p>\n<p>Chambre civile et commerciale 69<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 25 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 SERA c\/ AMADOU MBACK \u00c9 NDOYE PRESCRIPTION \u2013 POINT DE D\u00c9PART DE L\u2019ACTION EN GARANTIE POUR VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 DATE DE D\u00c9 COUVERTE DES VICES A fait l\u2019exacte application de l\u2019article 300 du COCC, la cour d\u2019Appel qui a retenu que le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie des vices cach\u00e9s correspond&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1093093","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 25 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 SERA c\/ AMADOU MBACK \u00c9 NDOYE PRESCRIPTION \u2013 POINT DE D\u00c9PART DE L\u2019ACTION EN GARANTIE POUR VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 DATE DE D\u00c9 COUVERTE DES VICES A fait l\u2019exacte application de l\u2019article 300 du COCC, la cour d\u2019Appel qui a retenu que le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie des vices cach\u00e9s correspond...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T22:26:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 25 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 SERA c\/ AMADOU MBACK \u00c9 NDOYE PRESCRIPTION \u2013 POINT DE D\u00c9PART DE L\u2019ACTION EN GARANTIE POUR VICES CACH\u00c9S \u2013 DATE DE D\u00c9 COUVERTE DES VICES A fait l\u2019exacte application de l\u2019article 300 du COCC, la cour d\u2019Appel qui a retenu que le point de d\u00e9part de l\u2019action en garantie des vices cach\u00e9s correspond...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T22:26:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-25-du-15-fevrier-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 25 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1093093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1093093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1093093"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1093093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}