{"id":1093095,"date":"2026-06-14T00:26:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:26:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T00:26:46","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:26:46","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 24 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017<\/p>\n<p>CHEIKH A. TIDIANE AMBARECK ET AUTRES c\/ M e GEORGES SCICLUNA<\/p>\n<p>AUXILLIAIRES DE JUST ICE \u2013 AVOCAT \u2013 CONTESTATION D\u2019HONORAIRES \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE CONVENTIO N \u00c9CRITE ENTRE LES P ARTIES \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE \u2013 APPLICATION DU BAR\u00c8ME DE R\u00c9F\u00c9RENCE<\/p>\n<p>Selon l\u2019article 15 de la loi n\u00b0 84-09 du 4 janvier 1984 portant cr\u00e9ation de l\u2019Ordre des avocats, les honoraires sont fix\u00e9s d\u2019accord parties entre l\u2019avocat et son client et peuvent faire l\u2019objet d\u2019une convention \u00e9crite pr\u00e9alable, et en cas de contestation, le diff\u00e9rend est soumis \u00e0 l\u2019arbitrage du b\u00e2tonnier qui statue en fonction de la convention \u00e0 lui pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e, et \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de celle-ci, en fonction des difficult\u00e9s, diligences entrepri- ses, de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat du litige et en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant au bar\u00e8me fix\u00e9 par ladite loi.<\/p>\n<p>Viole ce texte, le premier pr\u00e9sident d\u2019une cour d\u2019Appel qui, apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 l\u2019absence d\u2019une convention \u00e9crite entre les parties, retient qu\u2019il s\u2019induit des documents qu\u2019elles ont accept\u00e9 la fixation des honoraires forfaitairement.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n<p>Ou\u00ef MonsieurWaly F AYE, conseiller, en son rapport ;<\/p>\n<p>Ou\u00ef Monsieur Oumar D I\u00c8YE, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, en ses conclusions tendant au rejet du pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu la loi organique n\u00b0 2008- 35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique, pris en sa seconde branche, tir\u00e9e de la violation des arr\u00eat\u00e9s de 1993 et de 2008 fixant le bar\u00e8me de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence des honoraires d\u2019avocat :<\/p>\n<p>Vu l\u2019article premier de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 minist\u00e9riel n\u00b0 002072 \/MJ-ACS 04 MAR 1993 fixant le bar\u00e8me de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence des honoraires des avocats pour les ann\u00e9es judiciaires 1992\/93 et 1993\/94 :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019aux termes de ce texte, en application de l\u2019article 15 de la loi n\u00b0 84-09 du 4 janvier 1984 portant cr\u00e9ation de l\u2019Ordre des avocats, les honoraires sont fix\u00e9s d\u2019accord parties entre l\u2019avocat et son client et peuvent faire l\u2019objet d\u2019une convention \u00e9crite pr\u00e9- alable ;<\/p>\n<p>Que toutefois, en cas de contestation, le diff\u00e9rend est soumis \u00e0 l\u2019arbitrage du b\u00e2tonnier qui statue en fonction de la convention \u00e9crite pr\u00e9alable, si elle existe ;<\/p>\n<p>Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 13-14<\/p>\n<p>66 Chambre civile et commerciale<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en l\u2019absence de convention \u00e9crite pr\u00e9alable, le b \u00e2tonnier statuera en fonction des difficult\u00e9s, des diligences entreprises, de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat du litige et en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant au bar\u00e8me ci-dessus pris conform\u00e9ment aux articles 29 et 69 de ladite loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que M. A MBAREK ayant contest\u00e9 l\u2019ordonnance du b\u00e2ton- nier taxant les honoraires dus \u00e0 son avocat, ma\u00eetre S CICLUNA, \u00e0 28 202 000 francs, le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal r\u00e9gional les a r\u00e9duits \u00e0 3 916 000 francs ; qu\u2019en appel, le premier pr\u00e9sident de la cour d\u2019Appel a confirm\u00e9 l\u2019ordonnance du b\u00e2tonnier ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que pour d\u00e9clarer mal fond\u00e9e la contestation, l\u2019ordonnance attaqu\u00e9e retient que si les parties n\u2019ont pas conclu une convention \u00e9crite pr\u00e9alable, pour fixer le mon- tant des honoraires de l\u2019avocat, elles s\u2019accordent cependant sur le fait qu\u2019en janvier 2007, ce dernier avait r\u00e9clam\u00e9 des honoraires \u00e0 hauteur de 56 480 000 francs r\u00e9duits jusqu\u2019\u00e0 35 000 000 francs \u00ab suite \u00e0 \u00bb des remises qu\u2019il a consenties aux consorts A MBA- REK ; que ceux-ci ont vers\u00e9 sur cette somme des acomptes successifs constituant des actes d\u2019ex\u00e9cution et desquels il s\u2019induit qu\u2019ils ont accept\u00e9 la fixation des honoraires for- faitairement \u00e0 la somme de 35 000 000 francs et se sont oblig\u00e9s au paiement int\u00e9gral de ladite somme ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 l\u2019absence d\u2019une convention \u00e9crite entre les parties, ce qui rendait obligatoire la fixation du montant des honoraires uniquement par r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au bar\u00e8me et en tenant compte des difficult\u00e9s, des diligences entreprises et de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat du litige, le premier pr\u00e9sident n\u2019a pas satisfait aux exigences des textes susvis\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs, et sans qu\u2019il soit n\u00e9cessaire d\u2019examiner la seconde branche du moyen :<\/p>\n<p>Casse et annule en toutes ses dispositions l\u2019ordonnance n\u00b0 12 du 8 juillet 2015 du pre- mier pr\u00e9sident de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n<p>Remet la cause et les parties dans l\u2019\u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles se trouvaient avant ladite ordonnance et pour \u00eatre fait droit, les renvoie devant le premier pr\u00e9sident de la cour d\u2019Appel de Kaolack ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne Ma\u00eetre Georges S CICLUNA aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>Dit que le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera imprim\u00e9, qu&#039;il sera transcrit sur les registres de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar en marge ou \u00e0 la suite de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour supr\u00eame, chambre civile et commerciale en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>PR\u00c9SIDENT : EL HADJI MALICK SOW ; RAPPORTEUR : WALY FAYE ; CONSEILLERS : WALY FAYE, SOULEYMANE KANE, AMINATA LY NDIAYE, SEYDINA ISSA SOW ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : OUMAR DI\u00c8YE ; GREFFIER : MAU- RICE DIOMA KAMA.<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2017<\/p>\n<p>Chambre civile et commerciale 67<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coursupreme.gouv.sn\/sites\/default\/files\/2021-04\/BA13-14-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 24 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 CHEIKH A. TIDIANE AMBARECK ET AUTRES c\/ M e GEORGES SCICLUNA AUXILLIAIRES DE JUST ICE \u2013 AVOCAT \u2013 CONTESTATION D\u2019HONORAIRES \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE CONVENTIO N \u00c9CRITE ENTRE LES P ARTIES \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE \u2013 APPLICATION DU BAR\u00c8ME DE R\u00c9F\u00c9RENCE Selon l\u2019article 15 de la loi n\u00b0 84-09 du 4 janvier 1984 portant&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8457,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1093095","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 24 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 CHEIKH A. TIDIANE AMBARECK ET AUTRES c\/ M e GEORGES SCICLUNA AUXILLIAIRES DE JUST ICE \u2013 AVOCAT \u2013 CONTESTATION D\u2019HONORAIRES \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE CONVENTIO N \u00c9CRITE ENTRE LES P ARTIES \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE \u2013 APPLICATION DU BAR\u00c8ME DE R\u00c9F\u00c9RENCE Selon l\u2019article 15 de la loi n\u00b0 84-09 du 4 janvier 1984 portant...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T22:26:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 24 DU 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 CHEIKH A. TIDIANE AMBARECK ET AUTRES c\/ M e GEORGES SCICLUNA AUXILLIAIRES DE JUST ICE \u2013 AVOCAT \u2013 CONTESTATION D\u2019HONORAIRES \u2013 D\u00c9FAUT DE CONVENTIO N \u00c9CRITE ENTRE LES P ARTIES \u2013 OFFICE DU JUGE \u2013 APPLICATION DU BAR\u00c8ME DE R\u00c9F\u00c9RENCE Selon l\u2019article 15 de la loi n\u00b0 84-09 du 4 janvier 1984 portant...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T22:26:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-24-du-15-fevrier-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 24 du 15 F\u00c9VRIER 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1093095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1093095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1093095"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1093095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}