{"id":1093105,"date":"2026-06-14T00:27:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:27:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T00:27:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T22:27:02","slug":"cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b009 DU 25 JANVIER 2017<\/p>\n

PROMETRA c\/ SOURY SANGAR \u00c9<\/p>\n

CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL, EX\u00c9CUTION \u2013 MODIFICATION SUBSTANTIELLE DU CONTRAT \u2013 CONTINUATION DES RELATIONS DE TRAVAIL PLUS DE CINQ MOIS APR\u00c8 S LA MODIFICATION \u2013 IMPOSSIBILIT\u00c9 DE QUALIFIER D\u2019ABUSIVE LA RUPTURE<\/p>\n

Ne peut \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e d\u2019abusive, la rupture des relations de travail cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 une modification substantielle du contrat refus\u00e9e par le travailleur d\u00e8s lors que ce dernier a continu\u00e9 de travailler pendant plus de cinq mois sans contester la nouvelle situation et a d\u00e9missionn\u00e9 pour convenance personnelle, sans aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la modification du contrat.<\/p>\n

La Cour supr\u00eame,<\/p>\n

Vu la loi organique n\u00b02008-35 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2008 sur la Cour supr\u00eame ;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le d\u00e9fendeur conteste la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi au motif que le requ\u00e9- rant attaque un arr\u00eat du 18 d\u00e9cembre 2015, alors qu\u2019aucun arr\u00eat n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu entre les parties \u00e0 cette date ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le pourvoi porte sur l\u2019arr\u00eat rendu le 8 d\u00e9cembre 2015 ; que la date du 18 d\u00e9cembre mentionn\u00e9e dans le pourvoi constitue une simple erreur mat\u00e9rielle ;<\/p>\n

D\u2019o\u00f9 il suit que l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 n\u2019est pas encourue ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que l\u2019ONG PROMETRA et Soury S ANGAR\u00c9 ont conclu un \u00ab contrat de prestation de service \u00e0 dur\u00e9e d\u00e9termin\u00e9e \u00bb ; que ces relations, quali- fi\u00e9es de contrat de travail \u00e0 dur\u00e9e d\u00e9termin\u00e9e, se sont poursuivies au-del\u00e0 du terme, jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la d\u00e9mission de S ANGAR\u00c9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen, relev\u00e9 d\u2019office en application de l\u2019article 72-4 de la loi orga- nique sur la Cour supr\u00eame, tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article L 67 du code du travail ;<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019article L67 du code du travail ;<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon ce texte, que le contrat de travail peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019initiative du tra- vailleur ou de l\u2019employeur et, si la proposition de modification substantielle du contrat \u00e9mane de l\u2019employeur et que le travailleur la refuse, la rupture du contrat de travail sera consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme r\u00e9sultant de l\u2019initiative de l\u2019employeur, ce dernier \u00e9tant d\u00e8s lors tenu de respecter les r\u00e8gles de proc\u00e9dure du licenciement ;<\/p>\n

Bulletin des Arr\u00eats n os 13-14<\/p>\n

140 Chambre sociale<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour d\u00e9clarer le licenciement abusif, la cour d\u2019Appel a relev\u00e9, d\u2019une part, qu\u2019\u00e0 compter de janvier 2012, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 PROMETRA a pay\u00e9 \u00e0 S ANGAR\u00c9 la somme de 130 000 FCFA comme salaire, alors qu\u2019il percevait depuis le d\u00e9but de leurs relations de travail 250 000 F CFA et, d\u2019autre part, qu\u2019\u00e0 la date du 12 juin 2012, S ANGAR\u00c9 a formel- lement d\u00e9missionn\u00e9 puis \u00e9nonc\u00e9 \u00ab que l\u2019employeur qui ne conteste pas avoir diminu\u00e9 le salaire de M. S ANGAR\u00c9 et n\u2019en donne aucune raison, n\u2019a pas rapport\u00e9 la preuve s\u2019\u00eatre conform\u00e9 aux dispositions de l\u2019article L67 CT \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, alors que S ANGAR\u00c9 a continu\u00e9 de travailler pendant plus de cinq mois sans contester la nouvelle situation salariale et a d\u00e9missionn\u00e9 pour convenance personnelle, sans aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la modification du contrat, la cour d\u2019Appel a viol\u00e9, par fausse application, le texte susvis\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n

Et sans qu\u2019il soit besoin d\u2019examiner les moyens du pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0651 du 8 d\u00e9cembre 2015 de la cour d\u2019Appel de Dakar ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la cour d\u2019Appel de Thi\u00e8s ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la chambre sociale de la Cour supr\u00eame, en son audience publique tenue les jour, mois et an que dessus et o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents Madame et Mes- sieurs :<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SIDENT : JEAN LOUIS PAUL TOUPANE ; CONSEILLERS : AMADOU HA MADY DIALLO, AMINATA LY NDIAYE, AMADOU LAMINE BATHILY, IBRAHIMA SY ; AVOCAT G\u00c9N\u00c9RAL : AMETH DIOUF : AVOCATS : MA\u00ceTRE GU\u00c9DEL NDIAYE & ASSOCI\u00c9S, MA\u00ceTRE IBRAHIMA DIOP ; GREFFIER : CHEIKH DIOP.<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eats de la Cour supr\u00eame \u2013 Ann\u00e9e judiciaire 2017<\/p>\n

Chambre sociale 141<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Cour supreme du Senegal, bulletins officiels. Couverture partielle, republication enrichie a valider.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ARR\u00caT N\u00b009 DU 25 JANVIER 2017 PROMETRA c\/ SOURY SANGAR \u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL, EX\u00c9CUTION \u2013 MODIFICATION SUBSTANTIELLE DU CONTRAT \u2013 CONTINUATION DES RELATIONS DE TRAVAIL PLUS DE CINQ MOIS APR\u00c8 S LA MODIFICATION \u2013 IMPOSSIBILIT\u00c9 DE QUALIFIER D\u2019ABUSIVE LA RUPTURE Ne peut \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e d\u2019abusive, la rupture des relations de travail cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 une modification substantielle du contrat refus\u00e9e…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[109951],"kji_court":[109952],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[8683,131400,8460,26541,15594],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1093105","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-senegal","kji_court-cour-supreme-du-senegal","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-bulletin","kji_keyword-janvier","kji_keyword-senegal","kji_keyword-supreme","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caT N\u00b009 DU 25 JANVIER 2017 PROMETRA c\/ SOURY SANGAR \u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL, EX\u00c9CUTION \u2013 MODIFICATION SUBSTANTIELLE DU CONTRAT \u2013 CONTINUATION DES RELATIONS DE TRAVAIL PLUS DE CINQ MOIS APR\u00c8 S LA MODIFICATION \u2013 IMPOSSIBILIT\u00c9 DE QUALIFIER D\u2019ABUSIVE LA RUPTURE Ne peut \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e d\u2019abusive, la rupture des relations de travail cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 une modification substantielle du contrat refus\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-13T22:27:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017","og_description":"ARR\u00caT N\u00b009 DU 25 JANVIER 2017 PROMETRA c\/ SOURY SANGAR \u00c9 CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL, EX\u00c9CUTION \u2013 MODIFICATION SUBSTANTIELLE DU CONTRAT \u2013 CONTINUATION DES RELATIONS DE TRAVAIL PLUS DE CINQ MOIS APR\u00c8 S LA MODIFICATION \u2013 IMPOSSIBILIT\u00c9 DE QUALIFIER D\u2019ABUSIVE LA RUPTURE Ne peut \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e d\u2019abusive, la rupture des relations de travail cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 une modification substantielle du contrat refus\u00e9e...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/","name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-13T22:27:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-supreme-du-senegal-bulletin-arret-n-9-du-25-janvier-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour supr\u00eame du S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, Bulletin, arr\u00eat n\u00b0 9 du 25 JANVIER 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1093105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1093105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1093105"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1093105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}