{"id":1123850,"date":"2026-06-16T23:18:30","date_gmt":"2026-06-16T21:18:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/"},"modified":"2026-06-16T23:18:30","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T21:18:30","slug":"eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p><strong>Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> Kwestie van privaatrechtelijke aard. Deze zaak behoort niet tot de competentie van de raadkamer.<\/p>\n<p>ag<\/p>\n<p>Nr. 1990 request<\/p>\n<p>Parket, 20 januari 1987<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Remmelink<\/p>\n<p>Conclusie inzake<\/p>\n<p>[klaagster]<\/p>\n<p>Edelhoogachtbaar College,<\/p>\n<p>In deze zaak, waarin de Rechtbank ongegrond heeft verklaard een beklag van requirante tegen de inbeslagneming onder [betrokkene 1] (van inboedelgoederen die deze laatste bij haar zou hebben ontvreemd), mitsgaders het verzoek tot teruggave van deze goederen aan requirante tegen welke beschikking zij zich van beroep in cassatie heeft voorzien, is namens haar \u00e9\u00e9n middel van cassatie voorgesteld.<\/p>\n<p>Aangevoerd wordt, dat, nu deze goederen door [betrokkene 1] zijn gestolen, het op het eerste gezicht redelijk en maatschappelijk verantwoord is, dat de goederen aan haar zouden worden teruggegeven.<\/p>\n<p>Het komt mij voor, dat het middel faalt, aangezien de Rechtbank heeft vastgesteld, dat de behandeling in raadkamer zich er niet voor leent de onderliggende civielrechtelijke rechtsverhoudingen te onderzoeken. Ik houd het ervoor, dat de Rechtbank van oordeel is, dat zich hier wezenlijk een privaatrechtelijk geschil tussen requirante en voormelde [betrokkene 1] voordoet, en dat het mitsdien juist niet op het eerste gezicht redelijk en maatschappelijk verantwoord zou zijn de goederen aan requirante terug te geven. De Rechtbank heeft geredelijk aldus kunnen oordelen, omdat de raadsvrouw van requirante tijdens het onderzoek in raadkamer stelde, dat het hier (inderdaad) betrof een kwestie van privaatrechtelijke aard, en deze zaak niet tot de competentie van de raadkamer behoorde. Vgl. HR 18 januari 1983, NJ 1983, 445.<\/p>\n<p>Het middel niet aannemelijk achtend concludeer ik tot verwerping van het beroep.<\/p>\n<p>De Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden,<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/deeplink.rechtspraak.nl\/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kwestie van privaatrechtelijke aard. Deze zaak behoort niet tot de competentie van de raadkamer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[8283],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[137438],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[13218,92150,13095,8293,10182],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-1123850","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad","kji_year-137438","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-behoort","kji_keyword-competentie","kji_keyword-kwestie","kji_keyword-parket","kji_keyword-privaatrechtelijke","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kwestie van privaatrechtelijke aard. Deze zaak behoort niet tot de competentie van de raadkamer.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \\\/ 1990 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-16T21:18:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \\\/ 1990\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990","og_description":"Kwestie van privaatrechtelijke aard. Deze zaak behoort niet tot de competentie van de raadkamer.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/","name":"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-16T21:18:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclinlphr1987ac9904-parket-bij-de-hoge-raad-23-06-1987-1990\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:PHR:1987:AC9904 Parket bij de Hoge Raad , 23-06-1987 \/ 1990"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1123850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1123850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1123850"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1123850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}