{"id":1129617,"date":"2026-06-17T12:59:58","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T10:59:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/"},"modified":"2026-06-17T12:59:58","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T10:59:58","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-281","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 26 juin 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 228430\/VI-21514<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260281 – March\u00e9s publics – 26\/06\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-07-02<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

107 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-05 08:55<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.281 du 26 juin 2024 March\u00e9s et travaux publics – March\u00e9s
\n publics D\u00e9cision : Intervention accord\u00e9e Non lieu \u00e0 statuer\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

ecli_input ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR:256.104
\necli_prefixe ECLI
\necli_pays BE
\necli_cour RVSCE
\necli_cour_old RVSCE
\necli_annee 2023
\necli_ordre ARR:256.104
\necli_typedec ARR:256
\necli_datedec
\necli_chambre
\necli_nosuite
\nInvalid ECLI ID – no_ordre – Invalid type decision ARR:256
\nERROR JUPORTARobotRecordLienECLI ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR:256.104 invalide Invalid ECLI ID – no_ordre – Invalid type decision ARR:256 <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n VIe CHAMBRE
\n no 260.281 du 26 juin 2024
\n A. 228.430\/VI-21.514
\n En cause : la Chambre Nationale des Huissiers de Justice de Belgique, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Christophe DUBOIS, avocat, chauss\u00e9e de la Hulpe 185
\n 1170 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 coop\u00e9rative HUmani, anciennement d\u00e9nomm\u00e9e Intercommunale de Sant\u00e9 publique du Pays de Charleroi (ISPPC), ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Olivier JADIN, avocat, rue Jules Destr\u00e9e 72
\n 6001 Marcinelle.
\n Partie intervenante :
\n la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme VENTURIS, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me C\u00e9dric MOLITOR, avocat, boulevard Brand Whitlock 114\/12
\n 1200 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 21 juin 2019, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision de l\u2019ISPPC du 4 f\u00e9vrier 2019 attribuant le march\u00e9 \u201cRECOUVREMENT CR\u00c9ANCES ISPPC SCRL\u201d (n\u00b0 2018-1995) \u00e0 la SA
\n Venturis \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 26 juillet 2019, la SA Venturis demande \u00e0 \u00eatre re\u00e7ue en qualit\u00e9 de partie intervenante.
\n VI – 21.514 – 1\/4
\n Cette intervention a \u00e9t\u00e9 accueillie provisoirement par une ordonnance du 24 septembre 2019.
\n Le dossier administratif a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9.
\n Les m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse, en r\u00e9plique et en intervention ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement \u00e9chang\u00e9s.
\n Mme Pauline Lagasse, auditeur au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 un rapport sur la base de l\u2019article 12 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Le rapport a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 aux parties.
\n Les parties ont d\u00e9pos\u00e9 des derniers m\u00e9moires.
\n Par une ordonnance du 16 avril 2024, l\u2019affaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 22 mai 2024.
\n M. Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, a expos\u00e9 son rapport.
\n Me Patrick Thiel, loco Me Christophe Dubois, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie requ\u00e9rante, et Me Victor Davin, loco Me C\u00e9dric Molitor, avocat, comparaissant pour la partie intervenante, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 entendus en leurs observations.
\n Mme Pauline Lagasse, auditeur, a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendue en son avis conforme.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Intervention
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 26 juillet 2019, la SA Venturis demande \u00e0 \u00eatre re\u00e7ue en qualit\u00e9 de partie intervenante.
\n En tant qu\u2019attributaire du march\u00e9 public litigieux, elle justifie d\u2019un int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 intervenir dans la pr\u00e9sente proc\u00e9dure.
\n VI – 21.514 – 2\/4
\n Il y a lieu d\u2019accueillir cette requ\u00eate.
\n IV. Perte d\u2019objet
\n Par un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 256.104 du 22 mars 2023, rendu dans l\u2019affaire enr\u00f4l\u00e9e sous le num\u00e9ro G\/A. 227.582\/VI-21.437 (ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR:256.104), le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a annul\u00e9 l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9.
\n Il convient d\u00e8s lors de constater que le pr\u00e9sent litige a perdu son objet, sans qu\u2019il soit n\u00e9cessaire de se prononcer sur l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat de la requ\u00e9rante \u00e0 son recours, comme elle l\u2019a demand\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 22 mai 2024.
\n V. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure et autre d\u00e9pens
\n A. Th\u00e8ses des parties
\n \u00c0 l\u2019audience, la partie adverse a sollicit\u00e9 que la requ\u00e9rante soit condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, en ce compris l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure, compte tenu de l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours.
\n La requ\u00e9rante, qui rel\u00e8ve que la circonstance que le recours a perdu son objet est une cons\u00e9quence de l\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, r\u00e9clame au contraire que les d\u00e9pens soient liquid\u00e9s en sa faveur. Dans son dernier m\u00e9moire, elle sollicite une \u00ab indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure \u00e9valu\u00e9e [\u2026] \u00e0 la somme de 700,00 \u20ac \u00bb.
\n B. Appr\u00e9ciation du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat
\n La perte d\u2019objet du recours \u00e9tant une cons\u00e9quence de l\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, il convient de consid\u00e9rer que la requ\u00e9rante a obtenu gain de cause et qu\u2019elle est donc en droit de se voir accorder l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure qu\u2019elle r\u00e9clame, soit 700 euros.
\n Pour la m\u00eame raison, les autres d\u00e9pens doivent \u00eatre mis \u00e0 charge de la partie adverse, la partie intervenante supportant toutefois ses propres d\u00e9pens.
\n VI – 21.514 – 3\/4
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n La requ\u00eate en intervention introduite par la SA Venturis est accueillie.
\n Article 2.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer
\n Article 3.
\n La partie intervenante supporte le droit de 150 euros li\u00e9 \u00e0 son intervention.
\n La partie adverse supporte les autres d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 20 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 700 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 26 juin 2024, par la VIe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n David De Roy, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, Mich\u00e8le Belmessieri, conseill\u00e8re d\u2019\u00c9tat, Xavier Close, conseiller d\u2019\u00c9tat, Vincent Durieux, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, Le Pr\u00e9sident,
\n Vincent Durieux David De Roy
\n VI – 21.514 – 4\/4<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 26 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 No R\u00f4le: A. 228430\/VI-21514 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260281 – March\u00e9s publics – 26\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-07-02 Consultations: 107 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-05 08:55 Fiche…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[148261],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[17415,136851,20939,15537,120926],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1129617","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-281","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-intervenante","kji_keyword-intervention","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_keyword-rvsce","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 26 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 No R\u00f4le: A. 228430\/VI-21514 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260281 - March\u00e9s publics - 26\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-07-02 Consultations: 107 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-05 08:55 Fiche...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-17T10:59:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 26 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 No R\u00f4le: A. 228430\/VI-21514 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260281 - March\u00e9s publics - 26\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-07-02 Consultations: 107 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-05 08:55 Fiche...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-17T10:59:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-281\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.281"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1129617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1129617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1129617"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1129617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}