{"id":1130033,"date":"2026-06-17T14:17:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T12:17:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/"},"modified":"2026-06-17T14:17:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T12:17:55","slug":"eclibervsce2024arr-260-330","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 
\nConseil d'\u00c9tat <\/p>\n

Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 juin 2024 <\/p>\n

No ECLI:<\/p>\n

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330<\/p>\n

No R\u00f4le:<\/p>\n

A. 227311\/XV-3982<\/p>\n

Affaire:<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat 260330 – A\u00e9ronautique – 28\/06\/2024<\/p>\n

Domaine juridique:<\/p>\n

\n Droit administratif<\/p>\n

Date d’introduction:<\/p>\n

2024-07-03<\/p>\n

Consultations:<\/p>\n

111 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-06 00:41<\/p>\n

Fiche <\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat no 260.330 du 28 juin 2024 Economie – A\u00e9ronautique D\u00e9cision :
\n Non lieu \u00e0 statuer Retrait d'acte\n <\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus Cassation:<\/p>\n

CONSEIL D'ETAT\n<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9saurus UTU:<\/p>\n

DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF – CONSEIL D'\u00c9TAT – Arr\u00eats (Conseil d'\u00c9tat)\n <\/p>\n

Texte de la d\u00e9cision <\/p>\n

\n CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT, SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX ADMINISTRATIF
\n LA PR\u00c9SIDENTE DE LA XVe CHAMBRE
\n no 260.330 du 28 juin 2024
\n A. 227.311\/XV-3982
\n En cause : la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 BRUSSELS AIRLINES, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Tamara LEIDGENS, avocat, avenue Louise 65\/11
\n 1050 Bruxelles, contre :
\n la R\u00e9gion de Bruxelles-Capitale, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son Gouvernement, ayant \u00e9lu domicile chez Me Fran\u00e7ois TULKENS, avocat, boulevard de l\u2019Empereur 3
\n 1000 Bruxelles.
\n ——————————————————————————————————
\n I. Objet de la requ\u00eate
\n Par une requ\u00eate introduite le 28 janvier 2019, la partie requ\u00e9rante demande l\u2019annulation de \u00ab la d\u00e9cision du coll\u00e8ge d’Environnement du 26 novembre 2018 [\u2026] de confirmer la d\u00e9cision de Bruxelles Environnement du 29 juin 2018
\n [\u2026] de lui infliger une amende administrative de 25.160 euros du chef d’infractions \u00e0 l’arr\u00eat\u00e9 du Gouvernement de la R\u00e9gion de Bruxelles-Capitale du 27 mai 1999
\n relatif \u00e0 la lutte contre le bruit g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9 par le trafic a\u00e9rien pr\u00e9tendument commises de f\u00e9vrier 2017 \u00e0 avril 2017 \u00bb.
\n II. Proc\u00e9dure
\n Les m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse et en r\u00e9plique ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement \u00e9chang\u00e9s.
\n Le 27 d\u00e9cembre 2023, la partie requ\u00e9rante a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, une d\u00e9cision du 27 octobre 2023 retirant la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.
\n XV – 3982 – 1\/3
\n M. Philippe Nicod\u00e8me, auditeur adjoint au Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de faire application de l\u2019article 11\/5 du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Par une ordonnance du 4 juin 2024 et en l\u2019absence d\u2019objection de l\u2019auditeur rapporteur, la chambre a propos\u00e9 aux parties que l\u2019affaire ne soit pas appel\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 26, \u00a7 2, du r\u00e8glement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de proc\u00e9dure.
\n Aucune partie n\u2019a sollicit\u00e9 la tenue d\u2019une audience.
\n Il est fait application des dispositions relatives \u00e0 l\u2019emploi des langues, inscrites au titre VI, chapitre II, des lois sur le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, coordonn\u00e9es le 12 janvier 1973.
\n III. Perte d\u2019objet
\n Par une d\u00e9cision du 27 octobre 2023, la partie adverse a retir\u00e9 l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9. Cette d\u00e9cision de retrait n\u2019ayant pas \u00e9t\u00e9 contest\u00e9e, celle-ci est devenue d\u00e9finitive. Cette circonstance prive le recours de son objet, de sorte qu\u2019il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer.
\n IV. Indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure
\n Dans une note de liquidation des d\u00e9pens d\u00e9pos\u00e9e sur la plateforme \u00e9lectronique du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat le 10 juin 2024, la partie requ\u00e9rante sollicite une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n La disparition de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9, cons\u00e9quence de son retrait, constitue une forme de succ\u00e9dan\u00e9 d\u2019une annulation contentieuse de sorte que la partie requ\u00e9rante peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme ayant obtenu gain de cause, au sens de l\u2019article 30\/1 des lois coordonn\u00e9es sur le Conseil d’\u00c9tat. Il y a lieu de faire droit \u00e0 sa demande et de lui accorder une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros.
\n Le retrait de l\u2019acte attaqu\u00e9 justifie que les autres d\u00e9pens soient mis \u00e0 charge de la partie adverse.
\n XV – 3982 – 2\/3
\n PAR CES MOTIFS, LE CONSEIL D\u2019\u00c9TAT D\u00c9CIDE :
\n Article 1er.
\n Il n\u2019y a plus lieu de statuer.
\n Article 2.
\n La partie adverse supporte les d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 savoir le droit de r\u00f4le de 200 euros, la contribution de 20 euros et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 770 euros accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la partie requ\u00e9rante.
\n Ainsi prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Bruxelles le 28 juin 2024, par la XVe chambre du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, compos\u00e9e de :
\n Anne-Fran\u00e7oise Bolly, pr\u00e9sidente de chambre, Caroline Hug\u00e9, greffier.
\n Le Greffier, La Pr\u00e9sidente,
\n Caroline Hug\u00e9 Anne-Fran\u00e7oise Bolly
\n XV – 3982 – 3\/3<\/p>\n

Document PDF ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Imprimer cette page
\n   <\/p>\n

Taille d’impression <\/p>\n

S
\n M
\n L
\n XL<\/p>\n

  <\/p>\n

Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL
\n   <\/p>\n

Fermer l’onglet <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

✉ info-JUPORTAL@just.fgov.be<\/p>\n

©  2017-2026 Service ICT – SPF Justice<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Powered by PHP 8.5.0\n <\/p>\n

\n Server Software Apache\/2.4.66\n <\/p>\n

\n == Fluctuat nec mergitur ==\n <\/p>\n


\n
\n <\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

JUPORTAL. L avertissement officiel du portail precise qu il n existe pas de droit d auteur sur les arrets et jugements.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d’impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l’onglet Conseil d’\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 No R\u00f4le: A. 227311\/XV-3982 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260330 – A\u00e9ronautique – 28\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d’introduction: 2024-07-03 Consultations: 111 – derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-06 00:41 Fiche Arr\u00eat…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7731],"kji_court":[148368],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7735,17415,34939,15537,100565],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-1130033","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-belgique","kji_court-eclibervsce2024arr-260-330","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-article","kji_keyword-conseil","kji_keyword-euros","kji_keyword-requerante","kji_keyword-retrait","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 No R\u00f4le: A. 227311\/XV-3982 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260330 - A\u00e9ronautique - 28\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-07-03 Consultations: 111 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-06 00:41 Fiche Arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-17T12:17:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330","og_description":"JUPORTAL Base de donn\u00e9es publique de la jurisprudence belge Imprimer cette page Taille d'impression S M L XL Nouvelle recherche JUPORTAL Fermer l'onglet Conseil d'\u00c9tat Jugement\/arr\u00eat du 28 juin 2024 No ECLI: ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 No R\u00f4le: A. 227311\/XV-3982 Affaire: Arr\u00eat 260330 - A\u00e9ronautique - 28\/06\/2024 Domaine juridique: Droit administratif Date d'introduction: 2024-07-03 Consultations: 111 - derni\u00e8re vue 2026-06-06 00:41 Fiche Arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/","name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-06-17T12:17:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/eclibervsce2024arr-260-330\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.260.330"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/1130033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1130033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=1130033"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=1130033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}